Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover to Hormone Replacement Therapy: Impact of Biological Variability

Hannon, Rosemary, Blumsohn, Aubrey, Naylor, Kim, Eastell, Richard·1998·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Biochemical markers of bone turnover may be useful to monitor patients taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The aim of this study was to assess the utility of markers in monitoring HRT by comparing the response of a large panel of markers to HRT with their within subject variability. We measured the response of markers to transdermal estradiol in 11 postmenopausal women over 24 weeks. We measured the within subject variability of markers in 11 untreated healthy postmenopausal women over the same period. The mean decrease in markers of bone formation after 24 weeks treatment ranged from 19% for procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide (PICP) to 40% for procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP). The mean decrease in markers of bone resorption ranged from 10% for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) to 67% for C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide. The least significant change (LSC at p < 0.05), calculated from the within subject variability in the untreated group, was used to define response. LSC for osteocalcin was 21%, bone alkaline phosphatase 28%, PICP 24%, PINP 21%, type I collagen telopeptide 28%, TRAP 17%, urinary calcium 90%, hydroxyproline 75%, total deoxypyridinoline 47%, free pyridinoline 36%, free deoxypyridinoline 26%, N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide 70%, and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide 132%. The greatest number of responders after 24 weeks of treatment were found using PINP and osteocalcin (9 each), and free deoxypyridinoline (8 each) and total deoxypyridinoline (7 each). Lumbar spine bone mineral density defined four patients as responders. The ability to detect a response differs between markers and is not dependent on the magnitude of response to therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.7.1124

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Hannon, R., Blumsohn, A., Naylor, K., & Eastell, R.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1998-07-01
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1124-1133
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2093944682
Cited by
257
References
2
FWCI
21.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover to Hormone Replacement Therapy: Impact of Biological Variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.7.1124
The paper
Hannon, R., Blumsohn, A., Naylor, K., & Eastell, R. (1998). Response of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover to Hormone Replacement Therapy: Impact of Biological Variability. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.7.1124

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.