The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical correlations and prognosis based on serum autoantibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis
Abstract
Of 397 systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) patients from the University of Pittsburgh, who had serum determinations of both anti–Scl‐70 and anticentromere antibody (ACA), 26% had anti‐Scl‐70 and 22% had ACA. No patient had both autoantibodies. Weak associations with HLA–DR5 and HLA‐DR1 were detected with anti‐Scl‐70 and ACA, respectively. ACA was found almost exclusively (96%) in patients with limited cutaneous scleroderma (the CREST syndrome variant), but the majority (57%) of patients with limited scleroderma did not have this antibody. Among patients with limited scleroderma, those with ACA more often had calcinosis and telangiectasias and less often had pulmonary interstitial fibrosis and restrictive lung disease. However, the frequency of pulmonary hypertension and the survival rates were similar in the ACA + and ACA‐ limited scleroderma patients. Two‐thirds of patients with anti‐Scl‐70 had diffuse scleroderma, but only 33% of all diffuse scleroderma patients had this antibody. Within the subset of diffuse scleroderma, anti‐Scl‐70 was associated with peripheral vascular disease (digital pitting scars) and pulmonary interstitial fibrosis, but was not predictive of cardiac or renal involvement or survival. ACA and anti–Scl‐70 are useful in diagnosing and classifying systemic sclerosis variants and in predicting the natural course of the disease. Their mutually exclusive occurrence suggests either 2 separate clinical entities or important host factors determining their production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Steen, V., & Medsger, T. A. (2003) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.10775 · Cited by 494
Self-citationClinical features and prognosis of primary biliary cirrhosis associated with systemic sclerosis
Rigamonti, C., Shand, L. M., Feudjo, M., Bunn, C. C., Black, C. M., Denton, C. P., & Burroughs, A. K. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.075002 · Cited by 194
ECM formation and degradation during fibrosis, repair, and regeneration
Mayorca-Guiliani, A. E., Leeming, D. J., Henriksen, K., Mortensen, J. H., Nielsen, S. H., Anstee, Q. M., Sanyal, A. J., Karsdal, M. A., & Schuppan, D. (2025) · npj Metabolic Health and Disease · doi:10.1038/s44324-025-00063-4 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Steen, V. D., Powell, D. L., & Medsger, T. A.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 196-203
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2081028616
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical correlations and prognosis based on serum autoantibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.1780310207
- The paper
- Steen, V. D., Powell, D. L., & Medsger, T. A. (1988). Clinical correlations and prognosis based on serum autoantibodies in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780310207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.