Cited by 194Liver Diseases and ImmunitySystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesLiver Disease and Transplantation

Clinical features and prognosis of primary biliary cirrhosis associated with systemic sclerosis

Open access
Rigamonti, C, Shand, L M, Feudjo, M, Bunn, C C, Black, C M, Denton, C P, Burroughs, A K·2006·Gut

Abstract

Backgrounds and aims: To evaluate the prognosis of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) together with systemic sclerosis (SSc), as this is unknown. Methods and results: A PBC database of 580 patients identified 43 with PBC and SSc: two patients with PBC alone were matched to each PBC-SSc patient for serum bilirubin concentration at the initial visit. Forty (93%) patients had limited cutaneous SSc. At diagnosis of PBC, median values were: 49.7 years, bilirubin 17 μmol/l, and albumin 40.5 g/l. Liver diagnosis occurred a median 4.9 years after SSc in 24 (56%) patients. In matched patients, median values at diagnosis were: 53.2 years, bilirubin 12 μmol/l, and albumin 41 g/l. Median follow up was similar: 3.16 years (PBC-SSc) and 4.8 years (PBC alone). The risk of transplantation or death from diagnosis, adjusting for sex, age, log bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase was significantly lower in PBC-SSc (hazard ratio 0.116, p = 0.01) due to less transplantation (hazard ratio 0.068, p = 0.006). The rate of bilirubin increase was less in PBC-SSc (p = 0.04). Overall survival was similar (hazard ratio 1.11, p = 0.948); there were nine deaths (21%) in PBC-SSc (six SSc related and two liver related) and nine (11%) in PBC alone (six liver related). Conclusions: Liver disease has a slower progression in PBC-SSc compared with matched patients with PBC alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2005.075002

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anti-centromere antibodies have been reported to have potential prognostic impact, with a portal hypertensive phenotype.

    “Anti-centromere antibodies have also been reported to have potential prognostic impact (portal hypertensive phenotype) [79,80,78].”

    From EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis. (2017) · cites this paper as [79]

    The ‘Patients with PBC and ACA positivity’ section reports survival, transplantation and portal-hypertension-related complications in 13 ACA-positive patients. It does not establish that ACA predicts prognosis or identifies a distinct portal hypertensive phenotype; the Discussion says this group behaved as if PBC was the major determinant of outcome. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]20. Stadie V, Wohlrab J, Marsch WC. Reynolds syndrome-a rare combination of 2 autoimmune diseases. Med Klin (Munich) 2002;97:40-3.
  2. [44]44. Scheuer P. Primary biliary cirrhosis. Proc R Soc Med 1967;60:1257-60.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rigamonti, C., Shand, L. M., Feudjo, M., Bunn, C. C., Black, C. M., Denton, C. P., & Burroughs, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Burroughs, A K
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-09-08
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
388-394
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2114160420
Cited by
194
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, systemic sclerosis, limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis, prognosis, liver transplantation, mortality, bilirubin, disease progression, overall survival
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Antinuclear, Bilirubin, Centromere, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Scleroderma, Systemic, Liver Transplantation, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review