Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 681

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents

Listing, Joachim, Strangfeld, Anja, Kary, Sonja, Rau, Rolf, von Hinueber, Ulrich, Stoyanova‐Scholz, Maria, Gromnica‐Ihle, Erika, Antoni, Christian, Herzer, Peter, Kekow, Jörn, Schneider, Matthias, Zink, Angela·2005·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence rates of serious and nonserious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who start treatment with a biologic agent, and to compare these rates with those in patients with RA who receive conventional treatment. Methods: Patients enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included. Treating rheumatologists assessed adverse events and serious adverse events. All adverse events and serious adverse events experienced within 12 months after study entry were analyzed. Propensity score methods were applied to estimate which part of a rate increase was likely to be attributable to differences in patient characteristics. Results: Data were available for 512 patients receiving etanercept, 346 patients receiving infliximab, 70 patients receiving anakinra, and 601 control patients treated with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs. The total number of adverse events per 100 patient‐years was 22.6 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 18.7–27.2) among patients receiving etanercept, 28.3 (95% CI 23.1–34.7) among patients receiving infliximab, and 6.8 (95% CI 5.0–9.4) among controls (P< 0.0001). Significant differences in the rate of serious adverse events were also observed. For patients receiving etanercept, those receiving infliximab, and controls, the total numbers of serious adverse events per 100 patient‐years were 6.4 (95% CI 4.5–9.1), 6.2 (95% CI 4.0–9.5), and 2.3 (95% CI 1.3–3.9), respectively (P= 0.0016). After adjusting for differences in the case patient mix, the relative risks of serious adverse events were 2.2 (95% CI 0.9–5.4) for patients receiving etanercept and 2.1 (95% CI 0.8–5.5) for patients receiving infliximab, compared with controls. Conclusion: Patients treated with biologic agents have a higher a priori risk of infection. However, our data suggest that this risk is increased by treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.21386

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 681

Metadata

Authors
Listing, J., Strangfeld, A., Kary, S., Rau, R., von Hinueber, U., Stoyanova‐Scholz, M., Gromnica‐Ihle, E., Antoni, C., Herzer, P., Kekow, J., Schneider, M., & Zink, A.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-27
Volume
52
Issue
11
Pages
3403-3412
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2035642138
Cited by
681
References
1
FWCI
26.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.