The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: One‐year results from the dosing intravenous administration study
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Although oral bisphosphonates are effective treatments for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, oral dosing may be unsuitable for some patients. An efficacious intravenously administered bisphosphonate could be beneficial for such patients. Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen‐containing bisphosphonate, can be administered using extended dosing intervals, either orally or by rapid intravenous injection. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal intravenous dosing regimen for ibandronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods: In a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, phase III, noninferiority study, we compared 2 regimens of intermittent intravenous injections of ibandronate (2 mg every 2 months and 3 mg every 3 months) with a regimen of 2.5 mg of oral ibandronate daily, the latter of which has proven antifracture efficacy. The study group comprised 1,395 women (ages 55–80 years) who were at least 5 years postmenopausal. All patients had osteoporosis (lumbar spine [L2−L4] bone mineral density [BMD] T score less than −2.5). Participants also received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU). The primary end point was change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at 1 year. Changes in hip BMD and in the level of serum C‐telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) were also measured, as were safety and tolerability. Results: At 1 year, mean lumbar spine BMD increases were as follows: 5.1% among 353 patients receiving 2 mg of ibandronate every 2 months, 4.8% among 365 patients receiving 3 mg of ibandronate every 3 months, and 3.8% among 377 patients receiving 2.5 mg of oral ibandronate daily. Both of the intravenous regimens not only were noninferior, but also were superior (P < 0.001) to the oral regimen. Hip BMD increases (at all sites) were also greater in the groups receiving medication intravenously than in the group receiving ibandronate orally. Robust decreases in the serum CTX level were observed in all arms of the study. Both of the intravenous regimens were well tolerated and did not compromise renal function. Conclusion: As assessed by BMD, intravenous injections of ibandronate (2 mg every 2 months or 3 mg every 3 months) are at least as effective as the regimen of 2.5 mg orally daily, which has proven antifracture efficacy, and are well tolerated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of Risedronate on the Risk of Hip Fracture in Elderly Women
McClung, M. R., Geusens, P., Miller, P. D., Zippel, H., Bensen, W. G., Roux, C., Adami, S., Fogelman, I., Diamond, T., Eastell, R., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200102013440503 · Cited by 1,918
Self-citationTen Years' Experience with Alendronate for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
Bone, H. G., Hosking, D., Devogelaer, J.-P., Tucci, J. R., Emkey, R. D., Tonino, R. P., Rodriguez-Portales, J. A., Downs, R. W., Gupta, J., Santora, A. C., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030897 · Cited by 1,347
Chesnut, C. H., Skag, A., Christiansen, C., Recker, R., Stakkestad, J. A., Hoiseth, A., Felsenberg, D., Huss, H., Gilbride, J., Schimmer, R. C., et al. (2004) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.040325 · Cited by 1,229
Self-citationMiller, P. D., Mcclung, M. R., Macovei, L., Stakkestad, J. A., Luckey, M., Bonvoisin, B., Reginster, J.-Y., Recker, R. R., Hughes, C., Lewiecki, E. M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.050313 · Cited by 333
Self-citationBM 21.0955, a potent new bisphosphonate to inhibit bone resorption.
Mühlbauer, R. C., Bauss, F., Schenk, R., Janner, M., Bosies, E., Strein, K., & Fleisch, H. (1991) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650060915 · Cited by 239
Cited by
European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
on behalf of the Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), Kanis, J. A., Cooper, C., Rizzoli, R., & Reginster, J.-Y. (2019) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5 · Cited by 1,900
Self-citationfor the IOF-IFCC Bone Marker Standards Working Group, Vasikaran, S., Eastell, R., Bruyère, O., Foldes, A. J., Garnero, P., Griesmacher, A., McClung, M., Morris, H. A., Silverman, S., et al. (2011) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1501-1 · Cited by 1,212
Qaseem, A., Forciea, M. A., McLean, R. M., Denberg, T. D., & for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians* (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-1361 · Cited by 676
Adverse effects of bisphosphonates: Implications for osteoporosis management
Kennel, K. A., & Drake, M. T. (2009) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/s0025-6196(11)60752-0 · Cited by 496
Sieber, P., Lardelli, P., Kraenzlin, C. A., Kraenzlin, M. E., & Meier, C. (2013) · Clinical Drug Investigation · doi:10.1007/s40261-012-0041-1 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Delmas, P. D., Adami, S., Strugala, C., Stakkestad, J. A., Reginster, J., Felsenberg, D., Christiansen, C., Civitelli, R., Drezner, M. K., Recker, R. R., Bolognese, M., Hughes, C., Masanauskaite, D., Ward, P., Sambrook, P., & Reid, D. M.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-25
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1838-1846
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W1973356978
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 36.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.