The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long‐term comparison of rituximab treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis: Remission, relapse, and re‐treatment
Abstract
Objective: Current treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and vasculitis contribute to mortality and incapacity and are only partially effective; thus, newer therapies are clearly needed. Depletion of B cells has led to disease control in patients with autoimmune disorders. We sought to assess the long‐term efficacy and safety of a B cell–depleting therapy in patients with SLE and patients with vasculitis. Methods: In a prospective study with a median followup of 24 months, 11 patients with active or refractory SLE and 11 patients with active or refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV) received a course of therapy with rituximab (an anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody) along with a single dose of intravenous cyclophosphamide. Results: Remission followed rapid B cell depletion, with response rates of 100% among the 11 patients with SLE (6 patients had a complete response, and 5 patients had a partial response) and 91% among the 11 patients with AAV (9 patients had a complete response, and 1 patient had partial remission). A renal response occurred in all 6 patients with lupus nephritis. Clinical improvement was accompanied by significant reductions in the daily dose of prednisolone. Relapse occurred in 64% of the patients with SLE and in 60% of those with AAV. B cell return preceded relapse in the majority of patients, and further treatment with rituximab proved effective. IgG and IgM levels were maintained in the normal range. The incidence of infective complications was low; however, infusion reactions were common, and human antichimeric antibodies developed in 5 of 14 patients. Conclusion: B cell depletion offers the prospect of sustained disease remission and improved disease control combined with low toxicity in patients with active or refractory SLE or AAV. Relapse following treatment is common, but re‐treatment is rapidly effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Edwards, J. C. W., Szczepański, L., Szechiński, J., Filipowicz-Sosnowska, A., Emery, P., Close, D. R., Stevens, R. M., & Shaw, T. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032534 · Cited by 2,623
Jayne, D., Rasmussen, N., Andrassy, K., Bacon, P., Tervaert, J. W. C., Dadoniené, J., Ekstrand, A., Gaskin, G., Gregorini, G., de Groot, K., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020286 · Cited by 1,348
Self-citation
Cited by
Gordon, C., Amissah-Arthur, M.-B., Gayed, M., Brown, S., Bruce, I. N., D’Cruz, D., Empson, B., Griffiths, B., Jayne, D., Khamashta, M., et al. (2018) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex286 · Cited by 365
Self-citationRituximab in systemic lupus erythematosusA systematic review of off-label use in 188 cases
Ramos-Casals, M., Soto, M., Cuadrado, M., & Khamashta, M. (2009) · Lupus · doi:10.1177/0961203309106174 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, K. G. C., Jones, R. B., Burns, S. M., & Jayne, D. R. W.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08-31
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2970-2982
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2011557149
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term comparison of rituximab treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis: Remission, relapse, and re‐treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22046
- The paper
- Smith, K. G. C., Jones, R. B., Burns, S. M., & Jayne, D. R. W. (2006). Long‐term comparison of rituximab treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis: Remission, relapse, and re‐treatment. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.