Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐term comparison of rituximab treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis: Remission, relapse, and re‐treatment

Smith, K. G. C., Jones, R. B., Burns, S. M., Jayne, D. R. W.·2006·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Current treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and vasculitis contribute to mortality and incapacity and are only partially effective; thus, newer therapies are clearly needed. Depletion of B cells has led to disease control in patients with autoimmune disorders. We sought to assess the long‐term efficacy and safety of a B cell–depleting therapy in patients with SLE and patients with vasculitis. Methods: In a prospective study with a median followup of 24 months, 11 patients with active or refractory SLE and 11 patients with active or refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV) received a course of therapy with rituximab (an anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody) along with a single dose of intravenous cyclophosphamide. Results: Remission followed rapid B cell depletion, with response rates of 100% among the 11 patients with SLE (6 patients had a complete response, and 5 patients had a partial response) and 91% among the 11 patients with AAV (9 patients had a complete response, and 1 patient had partial remission). A renal response occurred in all 6 patients with lupus nephritis. Clinical improvement was accompanied by significant reductions in the daily dose of prednisolone. Relapse occurred in 64% of the patients with SLE and in 60% of those with AAV. B cell return preceded relapse in the majority of patients, and further treatment with rituximab proved effective. IgG and IgM levels were maintained in the normal range. The incidence of infective complications was low; however, infusion reactions were common, and human antichimeric antibodies developed in 5 of 14 patients. Conclusion: B cell depletion offers the prospect of sustained disease remission and improved disease control combined with low toxicity in patients with active or refractory SLE or AAV. Relapse following treatment is common, but re‐treatment is rapidly effective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.22046

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Smith, K. G. C., Jones, R. B., Burns, S. M., & Jayne, D. R. W.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08-31
Volume
54
Issue
9
Pages
2970-2982
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2011557149
Cited by
400
References
2
FWCI
33.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term comparison of rituximab treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis: Remission, relapse, and re‐treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.22046
The paper
Smith, K. G. C., Jones, R. B., Burns, S. M., & Jayne, D. R. W. (2006). Long‐term comparison of rituximab treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis: Remission, relapse, and re‐treatment. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.