Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antibodies against citrullinated vimentin in rheumatoid arthritis: Higher sensitivity and extended prognostic value concerning future radiographic progression as compared with antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides

Mathsson, Linda, Mullazehi, Mohammed, Wick, Marius C., Sjöberg, Olof, van Vollenhoven, Ronald, Klareskog, Lars, Rönnelid, Johan·2008·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: The Sa autoantigen can be found in inflamed synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and at least part of the humoral RA‐specific anti‐Sa response is directed against citrullinated vimentin. This study was undertaken to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic value of determination of levels of antibodies against modified citrullinated vimentin (anti‐MCV) as compared with antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides (anti‐CCP) in an inception cohort of patients with early RA. Methods: Clinical data, radiographs, and measurements of levels of anti‐MCV and anti‐CCP antibodies were obtained in 273 patients with early RA at baseline, after 3 months, and after 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. Autoantibodies were also analyzed in 100 healthy controls. Results: Of the 273 patients, 193 (70.7%) were anti‐MCV positive and 158 (57.9%) were anti‐CCP positive at the time of diagnosis, with nearly equal specificities (95% and 96%, respectively). Forty (14.7%) were anti‐MCV positive only, and 5 (1.8%) were anti‐CCP positive only. Anti‐MCV–positive and anti‐MCV–negative patients had similar disease activity at baseline, but presence of anti‐MCV was predictive of subsequent high disease activity and continued radiographic progression. Changes in anti‐MCV level showed stronger correlation with changes in clinical parameters than did changes in anti‐CCP level. The subgroup of patients who were anti‐MCV positive and anti‐CCP negative showed a higher rate of radiographic destruction than did patients who were negative for both anti‐MCV and anti‐CCP. Conclusion: These findings show that when patients with early RA are compared with healthy controls, analysis of anti‐MCV yields greater sensitivity and unchanged specificity as compared with analysis of anti‐CCP. Anti‐MCV also appears to perform better than anti‐CCP in identifying poor radiographic prognosis in patients with early RA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.23188

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Mathsson, L., Mullazehi, M., Wick, M. C., Sjöberg, O., van Vollenhoven, R., Klareskog, L., & Rönnelid, J.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-28
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
36-45
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2090004890
Cited by
206
References
0
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibodies against citrullinated vimentin in rheumatoid arthritis: Higher sensitivity and extended prognostic value concerning future radiographic progression as compared with antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.23188
The paper
Mathsson, L., Mullazehi, M., Wick, M. C., Sjöberg, O., van Vollenhoven, R., Klareskog, L., & Rönnelid, J. (2008). Antibodies against citrullinated vimentin in rheumatoid arthritis: Higher sensitivity and extended prognostic value concerning future radiographic progression as compared with antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.