Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modulation of CCR2 in rheumatoid arthritis: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trial

Vergunst, Clarissa E., Gerlag, Daniëlle M., Lopatinskaya, Luba, Klareskog, L., Smith, M. D., van den Bosch, F., Dinant, Huib J., Lee, Yih, Wyant, Timothy, Jacobson, Eric W., Baeten, Dominique, Tak, Paul P.·2008·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: CCR2 is a chemokine receptor expressed by monocytes, macrophages, and a subset of T cells. Its ligand, CCL2 (monocyte chemotactic protein 1), is abundantly present in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Blocking CCR2 prevents CCL2‐mediated chemotaxis in vitro and modulates arthritis in animal models of RA. In this study we examined the effects of CCR2 blockade on synovial inflammation in RA. Methods: The study was designed as a phase IIa clinical trial with a human CCR2 blocking antibody (MLN1202) in patients with active RA. Thirty‐two patients received 3 infusions, over a period of 6 weeks, with either placebo (n = 9) or anti‐CCR2 monoclonal antibody at 0.5 mg/kg (n = 7), 1.5 mg/kg (n = 7), or 4.0 mg/kg (n = 9). Safety was monitored with laboratory tests, immunotoxicity assessments, and documenting of adverse events, and European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology response criteria were used to assess clinical improvement. Synovial tissue was obtained at baseline and after 43 days of treatment, for pharmacodynamic analysis using immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. The Kruskal‐Wallis test was used to compare groups, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess changes within the groups. Results: All patients completed the study. Treatment with CCR2 blocking antibody reduced the levels of free CCR2 on CD14+ monocytes by at least 57% and up to 94% (P < 0.001), demonstrating the biologic activity of the compound. However, there was no reduction in the levels or expression of any of the synovial biomarkers. Accordingly, no clinical improvement was observed. Conclusion: Treatment with anti‐CCR2 blocking antibody did not result in amelioration of synovial inflammation in active RA. The results do not support the notion that blockade of CCR2 may be sufficient to induce clinical improvement in RA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.23591

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Vergunst, C. E., Gerlag, D. M., Lopatinskaya, L., Klareskog, L., Smith, M. D., van den Bosch, F., Dinant, H. J., Lee, Y., Wyant, T., Jacobson, E. W., Baeten, D., & Tak, P. P.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06-24
Volume
58
Issue
7
Pages
1931-1939
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2044684335
Cited by
236
References
1
FWCI
14.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modulation of CCR2 in rheumatoid arthritis: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.23591
The paper
Vergunst, C. E., Gerlag, D. M., Lopatinskaya, L., Klareskog, L., Smith, M. D., van den Bosch, F., Dinant, H. J., Lee, Y., Wyant, T., Jacobson, E. W., Baeten, D., & Tak, P. P. (2008). Modulation of CCR2 in rheumatoid arthritis: A double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trial. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23591

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.