Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 546

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP‐690,550 versus placebo

Kremer, Joel M., Bloom, Bradley J., Breedveld, Ferdinand C., Coombs, John H., Fletcher, Mark P., Gruben, David, Krishnaswami, Sriram, Burgos‐Vargas, Rubén, Wilkinson, Bethanie, Zerbini, Cristiano A. F., Zwillich, Samuel H.·2009·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 different dosages of CP‐690,550, a potent, orally active JAK inhibitor, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom methotrexate, etanercept, infliximab, or adalimumab caused an inadequate or toxic response. Methods: Patients (n = 264) were randomized equally to receive placebo, 5 mg of CP‐690,550, 15 mg of CP‐690,550, or 30 mg of CP‐690,550 twice daily for 6 weeks, and were followed up for an additional 6 weeks after treatment. The primary efficacy end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) response rate at 6 weeks. Results: By week 6, the ACR20 response rates were 70.5%, 81.2%, and 76.8% in the 5 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg twice daily groups, respectively, compared with 29.2% in the placebo group ( P < 0.001). Improvements in disease activity in CP‐690,550–treated patients compared with placebo were seen in all treatment groups as early as week 1. ACR50 and ACR70 response rates significantly improved in all treatment groups by week 4. The most common adverse events reported were headache and nausea. The infection rate in both the 15 mg twice daily group and the 30 mg twice daily group was 30.4% (versus 26.2% in the placebo group). No opportunistic infections or deaths occurred. Increases in mean low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and increases in mean serum creatinine level (0.04–0.06 mg/dl) were seen in all CP‐690,550 treatment arms. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that CP‐690,550 is efficacious in the treatment of RA, resulting in rapid, statistically significant, and clinically meaningful reductions in the signs and symptoms of RA. Further studies of CP‐690,550 in RA are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.24567

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 546

Metadata

Authors
Kremer, J. M., Bloom, B. J., Breedveld, F. C., Coombs, J. H., Fletcher, M. P., Gruben, D., Krishnaswami, S., Burgos‐Vargas, R., Wilkinson, B., Zerbini, C. A. F., & Zwillich, S. H.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-29
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
1895-1905
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2101217991
Cited by
546
References
0
FWCI
35.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP‐690,550 versus placebo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.24567
The paper
Kremer, J. M., Bloom, B. J., Breedveld, F. C., Coombs, J. H., Fletcher, M. P., Gruben, D., Krishnaswami, S., Burgos‐Vargas, R., Wilkinson, B., Zerbini, C. A. F., & Zwillich, S. H. (2009). The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP‐690,550 versus placebo. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24567

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.