Cited by 77Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Physical activity in women with arthritis: Examining perceived barriers and self‐regulatory efficacy to cope

Gyurcsik, Nancy C., Brawley, Lawrence R., Spink, Kevin S., Brittain, Danielle R., Fuller, Daniel L., Chad, Karen·2009·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether the theory‐based social cognitions of perceived barrier frequency, barrier limitation, and self‐regulatory efficacy to cope were predictors of planned physical activity among adult women with arthritis. A secondary purpose was to identify and provide a phenomenologic description of the relevant barriers and coping strategies reported by study participants. Methods: Eighty adult women (mean ± SD age 49.09 ± 12.89 years) with self‐reported doctor‐diagnosed arthritis participated in this observational study. Participants completed online survey measures of barriers to physical activity and, for each barrier, reported the frequency of occurrence and the extent of limitation. Measures of coping strategies for each barrier, efficacy to cope, and physical activity were also obtained. Results: A multiple hierarchical regression analysis resulted in a model that significantly predicted physical activity (F[9,70] = 6.80, P < 0.01, adjusted R 2 = 0.40). Barrier limitation (standardized β = −0.56) and efficacy (standardized β = 0.20) were significant independent predictors. Phenomenologic findings indicated that arthritis‐specific personal barriers (e.g., pain and fatigue due to arthritis) and arthritis‐specific coping strategies (e.g., activity modification) were more commonly reported than generic barriers and coping strategies. Conclusion: Self‐regulatory efficacy to cope and relevant perceived physical activity barriers, which were primarily arthritis‐specific and moderately or more limiting to planned physical activity, were important social cognitive predictors of physical activity, a key nonpharmacologic arthritis treatment, among women with arthritis. Future research direction should examine potential moderators of the relationship between these predictors and physical activity, such as pain acceptance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.24697

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gyurcsik, N. C., Brawley, L. R., Spink, K. S., Brittain, D. R., Fuller, D. L., & Chad, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-30
Volume
61
Issue
8
Pages
1087-1094
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0123
OpenAlex
W2029222972
Cited by
77
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis Care & Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
arthritis, physical activity, women, perceived barriers, self-regulatory efficacy, coping strategies, social cognitive theory, activity modification, pain, fatigue, non-pharmacological treatment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Arthritis, Attitude to Health, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Regression Analysis, Exercise, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review