Cited by 74Physical Activity and HealthMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

A Community-Based Physical Activity Counselling Program for People With Knee Osteoarthritis: Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of the Track-OA Study

Open access
Li, Linda C, Sayre, Eric C, Xie, Hui, Clayton, Cam, Feehan, Lynne M·2017·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical activity can improve health outcomes in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA); however, participation in physical activity is very low in this population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the use of wearables (Fitbit Flex) and telephone counselling by a physical therapist (PT) for improving physical activity in people with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of knee OA, or who have passed 2 validated criteria for early OA. METHODS: We conducted a community-based feasibility randomized controlled trial. The immediate group (n=17) received a brief education session by a physical therapist, a Fitbit Flex activity tracker, and a weekly telephone call for activity counselling with the physical therapist. The delayed group (n=17) received the same intervention 1 month later. All participants were assessed at baseline (T0), and the end of 1 month (T1) and 2 months (T2). Outcomes were (1) mean moderate to vigorous physical activity time, (2) mean time spent on sedentary behavior, (3) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and (4) Partners in Health Scale. Feasibility data were summarized with descriptive statistics. We used analysis of covariance to evaluate the effect of the group type on the outcome measures at T1 and T2, after adjusting for blocking and T0. We assessed planned contrasts of changes in outcome measures over measurement periods. RESULTS: We identified 46 eligible individuals; of those, 34 (74%) enrolled and no one dropped out. All but 1 participant adhered to the intervention protocol. We found a significant effect, with the immediate intervention group having improved in the moderate to vigorous physical activity time and in the Partners in Health Scale at T0 to T1 compared with the delayed intervention group. The planned contrast of the immediate intervention group at T0 to T1 versus the delayed group at T1 to T2 showed a significant effect in the sedentary time and the KOOS symptoms subscale, favoring the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of a behavioral intervention, supported by the use of a wearable device, to promote physical activity among people with knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02313506; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02313506 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6r4P3Bub0).

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Track-OA was a community-based feasibility randomized controlled trial (N=34) testing Fitbit Flex plus physical therapist telephone counselling for people with knee osteoarthritis. It met retention and adherence targets but fell short on recruitment, with preliminary signals favoring the immediate group for MVPA and self-management at 1 month and unexpected delayed-group improvements in sedentary time and KOOS symptoms.

Key findings

  • Feasibility: 46 eligible individuals were identified, 34 (74%) enrolled, 0% dropped out, 88% (30/34) adhered to the intervention and assessment protocol, and there was 0% SenseWear loss or malfunction; no adverse events were reported.
  • At T0 to T1, the immediate group improved significantly compared with the delayed group in daily bouted MVPA ≥3 METs (contrast coefficient –31.1, 95% CI –56.6 to –5.7; P=.02) and Partners in Health Scale scores (contrast coefficient 10.9, 95% CI 2.5-19.3; P=.02).
  • In the planned contrast comparing immediate group T0-T1 with delayed group T1-T2, significant effects favored the delayed group for sedentary time (contrast coefficient –83.6, 95% CI –154.1 to –13.1; P=.03) and KOOS symptoms subscale (contrast coefficient 6.9, 95% CI 0.4-13.5; P=.048).
  • No significant effects were found in the contrast comparing immediate group T0-T1 with delayed group T0-T2; imputation analyses were consistent with the main missing-at-random analysis.

Methods

  • Community-based feasibility randomized controlled trial using a delayed-control design: participants were randomized 1:1 to immediate intervention or a 1-month delayed intervention; all received the intervention by the end of the study.
  • Participants were adults with physician-confirmed knee OA or who met 2 validated criteria for early OA; 34 enrolled (17 immediate, 17 delayed), mean age 55.5 (SD 8.6) years, 82% women, mean BMI 27.2 (SD 4.7) kg/m².
  • Intervention: 1.5-hour group education session, Fitbit Flex wrist tracker, and 4 weekly 20-minute telephone counselling calls with a physical therapist using brief action planning; outcomes included SenseWear-measured bouted MVPA (primary), sedentary time, KOOS, and Partners in Health Scale, analyzed with ANCOVA adjusted for blocking and baseline plus planned contrasts.

Limitations

  • The paper states it did not assess the full spectrum of feasibility, specifically demand (intent to use) and acceptability (intent to continue use and satisfaction); the sample was relatively active at baseline; and 82% of participants were women, limiting examination of sex effects.
  • The paper states that analyses were not adjusted for multiple comparisons, so significant results cannot be ruled out as due to chance.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was small (N=34) and recruitment was 74%, below the prespecified 80% target; baseline group differences in age and BMI (immediate group younger and higher BMI) may affect comparisons.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mhealth.7863

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 53 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Results from the imputation analysis were in line with the main missing-at-random analysis in estimates, standard errors, and P values of group effects.

    “Results from the imputation analysis (data not shown) were in line with the main missing-at-random analysis, in estimates, standard errors, and P values of group effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    There was a significant difference in the KOOS symptoms subscale between the immediate group at T0 to T1 and the delayed group at T1 to T2.

    “Our result in the KOOS symptoms subscale was similar, with a significant difference found between the immediate group at T0 to T1 and the delayed group at T1 to T2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Other KOOS subscales are also associated with symptom severity.
  • Findingnone given

    There was a lack of significant difference in other KOOS subscales.

    “it should be viewed in the context of the lack of a significant difference in other KOOS subscales”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The intervention appeared to have a more favorable effect in the delayed group (T1 to T2) than in the immediate group (T0 to T1) on sedentary behavior.

    “the intervention appeared to have a more favorable effect in the delayed group (T1 to T2) than in the immediate group (T0 to T1)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The immediate group showed a trend of improvement in the Partners in Health Scale compared with the delayed group at T0 to T1.

    “with the immediate group showing a trend of improvement in MVPA (≥3 METs) and the Partners in Health Scale compared with the delayed group at T0 to T1”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Between January and March 2015 (7 weeks), 149 people expressed interest to participate, and 46 met eligibility criteria; 34 were enrolled and completed the study.

    “Between January and March, 2015 (7 weeks), 149 people expressed an interest to participate, and 46 met the eligibility criteria. Of those, 34 were enrolled and completed the study (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The recruitment strategy identified 46 eligible individuals; of those, 34 (74%) enrolled and none dropped out.

    “We identified 46 eligible individuals; of those, 34 (74%) enrolled and no one dropped out.”
    • Also stated in: § Feasibility · plain
      “Our recruitment strategy identified 46 eligible individuals; of those, 34 (74%) enrolled and none dropped out (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In the delayed group, 1 participant did not complete the outcome measures.

    “In the delayed group, 1 participant did not complete the outcome measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lewis et al found preliminary evidence of improvement in physical activity participation and body weight with wearables, but no difference when compared with other behavioral change interventions; only 1 included study was high quality.

    “In a systematic review of 11 studies evaluating wearables (1272 participants), Lewis et al [25] found preliminary evidence of improvement in physical activity participation and body weight, but no difference when compared with other behavioral change interventions. Only 1 of the included studies was deemed to be of high quality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Talbot et al found an average increase of 23% in daily steps and 21% in isometric quadriceps muscle strength in people with knee osteoarthritis who received a pedometer-driven walking program plus self-management education compared with an education-only group.

    “For example, Talbot et al [22] combined a pedometer-driven walking program with self-management education for people with knee OA and found an average increase of 23% in individuals’ daily steps and of 21% in isometric quadriceps muscle strength, compared with an education only group [22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Talbot, L, 2003, J Am Geriatr Soc source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The randomized delayed-control design allows preliminary efficacy to be assessed within a conventional randomized controlled trial at 1 month while all participants receive the intervention after 1 month.

    “As such, preliminary efficacy could be assessed within a conventional RCT (ie, with an intervention group and a control group) at 1 month, while all participants received the intervention after 1 month.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The intervention components are likely beneficial and present a low risk to participants.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The research protocol was approved by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (application number: H14-02631).

    “The research protocol was approved by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (application number: H14-02631)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    57% of people with arthritis were physically inactive during leisure time, compared with 46% of those without arthritis.

    “The 2011 Canadian Community Health Survey also found that 57% of people with arthritis were physically inactive during their leisure time, compared with 46% of those without arthritis (Multimedia Appendix 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Multimedia Appendix 1

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a need for interventions to both improve time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity and decrease sitting time.

    “Hence, there is a need for interventions to both improve the time spent in MVPA and decrease sitting time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Consumer wearables usually include motivational techniques such as self-monitoring and real-time feedback, but rarely address skills such as action planning and problem solving, which are essential to changing physical activity behavior.

    “In a review of 13 consumer wearables, Lyons et al [24] concludes that these devices usually include motivational techniques, such as self-monitoring and real-time feedback, but rarely address skills such as action planning and problem solving, which are essential to changing physical activity behavior.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Physical activity can improve pain, mobility, and quality of life in people with knee osteoarthritis.

    “It is well known that physical activity can improve pain, mobility, and quality of life in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) [1-4].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] 2005, Phys Ther

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The immediate group was younger than the delayed group (mean age 52.3, SD 9.7 vs 58.7, SD 6.0 years).

    “with the immediate group (mean age 52.3, SD 9.7 years; n=17) younger than the delayed group (mean 58.7, SD 6.0 years; n=17).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    SenseWear is a research-based accelerometer and sensor with established measurement properties.

    “SenseWear is a research-based accelerometer and sensor with established measurement properties [36].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The mean body mass index was 27.2 (SD 4.7) kg/m2, with the immediate group higher than the delayed group (29.1 vs 25.4).

    “The mean body mass index was 27.2 (SD 4.7) kg/m2, with the immediate group (mean 29.1, SD 4.5) higher than the delayed group (mean 25.4, SD 4.2) (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Partners in Health Scale is a 12-item measure designed to assess perceived self-management capacity via subjective knowledge of the health condition and treatment, and perceived self-management behavior (Cronbach alpha=.82).

    “The Partners in Health Scale is a 12-item measure designed to assess perceived self-management capacity via subjective knowledge of the health condition and treatment, and perceived self-management behavior (eg, adopting a healthy lifestyle) (Cronbach alpha=.82) [41].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several recent systematic reviews have raised similar issues.

    “Similar issues have been raised by several recent systematic reviews on interventions to change activity behavior [47-49].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [47] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [49] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies on physical activity interventions generally result in short-term improvement (within 6 months).

    “These findings are in line with previous studies on physical activity interventions, which generally result in short-term improvement (within 6 months) [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Track-OA study developed a physical activity counselling program that is practical and can be implemented in a full RCT.

    “in the Track-OA study we have developed a physical activity counselling program that is practical and can be implemented in a full RCT”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02313506).

    “was registered with ClinicalTials.gov (NCT02313506)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score has been validated in people with osteoarthritis.

    “It was originally developed for people recovering from anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injury and has been validated in people with OA [39,40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [39] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] Roos, EM, 1998, Scand J Med Sci Sports source

      Not checked in the free run.

20 of 20
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Data were missing at random.

    “which assumed that data were missing at random.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Wearable devices such as fitness bands and smart watches offer additional features compared with pedometers, such as tracking intensity and visualizing activity performance over time.

    “Compared with pedometers, wearable devices such as fitness bands and smart watches offer additional features, such as the ability to track the intensity of activities and to visualize activity performance over time.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The intervention components are likely beneficial and present a low risk to participants.

    “This study design is the best suited for complex interventions with components that are likely beneficial and present a low risk to participants (eg, promoting physical activity).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Patients who are inactive are more likely to need active intervention.

    “Since patients who are inactive are more likely to need active intervention”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Men and women may respond to behavioral interventions differently.

    “Since men and women may respond to behavioral interventions differently”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Other KOOS subscales are also associated with symptom severity.

    “which are also associated with symptom severity”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less time was spent in sedentary behavior for those receiving a consumer-based wearable activity tracker intervention compared with control groups; however, the finding was not significant, and the quality of the evidence was graded as very low.

    “Less time was spent in sedentary behavior for those receiving a consumer-based wearable activity tracker intervention compared with control groups; however, the finding was not significant, and the quality of the evidence was graded as very low [29,31-33,37-40].”

    From Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [39]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 17 studies specified that participants must have regular access to the internet, a computer, tablet, and/or smartphone.

    “Furthermore, 17 studies specified that the participant must have regular access to the internet, a computer, tablet, and/or smartphone [21,30,33,35-37,39,41-47,51-53]”
  • The significant heterogeneity in MVPA is most likely because of the inclusion of a greater range of intervention types and the method by which MVPA was measured, including two studies that subjectively measured MVPA and another study that presented MVPA data in bouts.

    “This is most likely because of the inclusion of a greater range of intervention types when compared with other outcome measures and the method by which MVPA was measured, including 2 studies [30,48] that subjectively measured MVPA and another study [39] that presented MVPA data in bouts.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Incorrect percentage for immediate-group participants reporting good health

    Minor

    The table reports 4 immediate-group participants with good health as 26%, but 4 of 17 is 23.5%, or 24% rounded to a whole percent.

    Reported 26 · recomputed 23.529412

1 of 1

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 2005, Phys Ther, 85, 907
  2. Li, L, 2008, British Columbia Osteoarthritis Survey
  3. Der Ananian, C, 2006, Prev Chron Dis, 3, A81
  4. Thomas, S, 1992, Can J Sport Sci, 17, 338
  5. Gutnick, D, 2014, J Clin Outcomes Manag, 21, 17

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L. C., Sayre, E. C., Xie, H., Clayton, C., & Feehan, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Li, Linda C
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2017-06-26
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
e86
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2697803655
Cited by
74
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
knee osteoarthritis, physical activity counseling, wearable activity trackers, Fitbit, telephone counseling, physiotherapists, sedentary behavior, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, behavioral interventions, early osteoarthritis, KOOS, Partners in Health Scale, community-based intervention, feasibility, intervention timing, social support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review