Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LY2439821, a humanized anti–interleukin‐17 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A phase I randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, proof‐of‐concept study

Genovese, M. C., Van den Bosch, F., Roberson, S. A., Bojin, S., Biagini, I. M., Ryan, Peter, Sloan‐Lancaster, J.·2010·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: We undertook this study to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of LY2439821, a humanized anti–interleukin‐17 (anti–IL‐17) monoclonal antibody, in a first in‐human trial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients taking oral disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study consisted of 2 parts. In part A, 20 patients received 1 intravenous (IV) dose of LY2439821 (0.06, 0.2, 0.6, or 2.0 mg/kg, escalating) or placebo followed by 8 weeks of evaluation. End points included safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. In part B, 77 patients received 1 IV dose of LY2439821 (0.2, 0.6, or 2.0 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks for a total of 5 doses, with a total evaluation period of 16 weeks. End points included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and efficacy (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28] and percentages of patients meeting American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement criteria [achieving an ACR20, ACR50, or ACR70 response]). The primary efficacy end point was the DAS28 at week 10. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across all groups. Changes in the DAS28 were significantly greater in the 0.2 mg/kg, 2.0 mg/kg, and all‐LY2439821–combined groups (−2.3, −2.4, and −2.3, respectively) than in the placebo group (−1.7) at week 10 ( P ≤ 0.05), and these differences were significant as early as week 1. Percentages of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses as well as improvements in the ACR core set of measures were greater in LY2439821‐treated patients than in placebo‐treated patients at multiple time points. There was no apparent dose‐response relationship in treatment‐emergent adverse events. Conclusion: LY2439821 added to oral DMARDs improved signs and symptoms of RA, with no strong adverse safety signal noted. This first evaluation of LY2439821 supports neutralization of IL‐17 as a potential novel goal for the treatment of RA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.27334

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Genovese, M. C., Van den Bosch, F., Roberson, S. A., Bojin, S., Biagini, I. M., Ryan, P., & Sloan‐Lancaster, J.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-30
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
929-939
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2076456688
Cited by
451
References
1
FWCI
44.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LY2439821, a humanized anti–interleukin‐17 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A phase I randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, proof‐of‐concept study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.27334
The paper
Genovese, M. C., Van den Bosch, F., Roberson, S. A., Bojin, S., Biagini, I. M., Ryan, P., & Sloan‐Lancaster, J. (2010). LY2439821, a humanized anti–interleukin‐17 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A phase I randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, proof‐of‐concept study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27334

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.