Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: The lupus nephritis assessment with rituximab study

Rovin, Brad H., Furie, Richard, Latinis, Kevin, Looney, R. John, Fervenza, Fernando C., Sanchez‐Guerrero, Jorge, Maciuca, Romeo, Zhang, David, Garg, Jay P., Brunetta, Paul, Appel, Gerald, LUNAR Investigator Group·2012·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase III trial in patients with lupus nephritis treated concomitantly with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. Methods: Patients (n = 144) with class III or class IV lupus nephritis were randomized 1:1 to receive rituximab (1,000 mg) or placebo on days 1, 15, 168, and 182. The primary end point was renal response status at week 52. Results: Rituximab depleted peripheral CD19+ B cells in 71 of 72 patients. The overall (complete and partial) renal response rates were 45.8% among the 72 patients receiving placebo and 56.9% among the 72 patients receiving rituximab ( P = 0.18); partial responses accounted for most of the difference. The primary end point (superior response rate with rituximab) was not achieved. Eight placebo‐treated patients and no rituximab‐treated patients required cyclophosphamide rescue therapy through week 52. Statistically significant improvements in serum complement C3, C4, and anti–double‐stranded DNA (anti‐dsDNA) levels were observed among patients treated with rituximab. In both treatment groups, a reduction in anti‐dsDNA levels greater than the median reduction was associated with reduced proteinuria. The rates of serious adverse events, including infections, were similar in both groups. Neutropenia, leukopenia, and hypotension occurred more frequently in the rituximab group. Conclusion: Although rituximab therapy led to more responders and greater reductions in anti‐dsDNA and C3/C4 levels, it did not improve clinical outcomes after 1 year of treatment. The combination of rituximab with MMF and corticosteroids did not result in any new or unexpected safety signals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.34359

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,461

Metadata

Authors
Rovin, B. H., Furie, R., Latinis, K., Looney, R. J., Fervenza, F. C., Sanchez‐Guerrero, J., Maciuca, R., Zhang, D., Garg, J. P., Brunetta, P., Appel, G., & LUNAR Investigator Group
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-27
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
1215-1226
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W1989273660
Cited by
1,461
References
2
FWCI
79.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: The lupus nephritis assessment with rituximab study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.34359
The paper
Rovin, B. H., Furie, R., Latinis, K., Looney, R. J., Fervenza, F. C., Sanchez‐Guerrero, J., Maciuca, R., Zhang, D., Garg, J. P., Brunetta, P., Appel, G., & LUNAR Investigator Group. (2012). Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: The lupus nephritis assessment with rituximab study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34359

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.