The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brief Report: Induction of sustained remission in recurrent catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome via inhibition of terminal complement with eculizumab
Abstract
Objective: Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is characterized by histopathologic evidence of small vessel thrombosis, dysfunction of multiple organs occurring over a short period of time, and laboratory confirmation of the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Treatment of CAPS focuses on anticoagulation therapy and on removal of aPL that promote thrombosis by activating endothelial cells, monocytes, and platelets. Studies in animal models support the hypothesis that a more targeted intervention, such as complement inhibition, may be an effective means to prevent aPL‐induced thrombosis. Herein we describe use of an inhibitor of complement activation to treat CAPS that was refractory to conventional therapy. Methods: Our patient was a young man who had recurrent CAPS characterized by multiple arterial thromboses in large and small vessels despite maximal anticoagulation, immunosuppression, and plasma exchange therapy. We treated him with eculizumab, an anti‐C5 monoclonal antibody that blocks activation of terminal complement. Results: Administration of eculizumab, at doses that blocked complement activity, aborted acute progressive thrombotic events, reversed thrombocytopenia, and was associated with no further clinical episodes of thrombosis during >3 years of therapy. Conclusion: This first report of the use and clinical efficacy of eculizumab, an inhibitor of complement activation, in the treatment of CAPS demonstrates both the importance of complement (specifically, terminal complement components) in the pathogenesis of CAPS and the therapeutic benefit of complement inactivation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cervera, R., Piette, J., Font, J., Khamashta, M. A., Shoenfeld, Y., Camps, M. T., Jacobsen, S., Lakos, G., Tincani, A., Kontopoulou‐Griva, I., et al. (2002) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.10187 · Cited by 2,156
Cited by
Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome
Garcia, D., & Erkan, D. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1705454 · Cited by 819
The Pathogenesis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome
Giannakopoulos, B., & Krilis, S. A. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1112830 · Cited by 688
Connelly‐Smith, L., Alquist, C. R., Aqui, N. A., Hofmann, J. C., Klingel, R., Onwuemene, O. A., Patriquin, C. J., Pham, H. P., Sanchez, A. P., Schneiderman, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.22043 · Cited by 684
Neuropsychiatric lupus: new mechanistic insights and future treatment directions
Schwartz, N., Stock, A. D., & Putterman, C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-018-0156-8 · Cited by 429
Cervera, R. (2017) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/s0049-3848(17)30066-x · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapira, I., Andrade, D., Allen, S. L., & Salmon, J. E.
- Venue
- Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-27
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2719-2723
- ISSN
- 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-0131
- OpenAlex
- W2075595968
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brief Report: Induction of sustained remission in recurrent catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome via inhibition of terminal complement with eculizumab. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.34440
- The paper
- Shapira, I., Andrade, D., Allen, S. L., & Salmon, J. E. (2012). Brief Report: Induction of sustained remission in recurrent catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome via inhibition of terminal complement with eculizumab. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34440
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.