Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Active Placebo–Controlled Clinical Trial

Open access
Smith, Michael T., Finan, Patrick H., Buenaver, Luis F., Robinson, Mercedes, Haque, Uzma, Quain, Angela, McInrue, Erin, Han, Dingfen, Leoutsakis, Jeannie, Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A.·2015·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective: Insomnia is prevalent among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Research indicates that sleep disruption may amplify clinical pain by altering central pain modulation, suggesting that treatment of insomnia may improve pain. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive–behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT‐I) in patients with knee OA, to determine whether improvements in sleep predict reduced pain, and to determine whether alterations in pain modulation mediate improvements in clinical pain. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double‐blind, active placebo–controlled clinical trial of CBT‐I in 100 patients with knee OA and insomnia (mean ± SD age 59.4 ± 9.5 years). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 8 sessions of CBT‐I or behavioral desensitization (placebo). We conducted in‐home polysomnography (PSG), diary assessment, and sensory tests of pain modulation at baseline, posttreatment, 3 months, and 6 months. Results: Intent‐to‐treat analyses demonstrated substantial improvement in sleep in both groups of patients. Patients in the CBT‐I group had significantly greater reductions in wake after sleep onset (WASO), as measured by patient diary and PSG. Patients in both groups reported significant and comparable reductions in pain over 6 months, with one‐third reporting a 30% reduction in pain severity. Baseline‐to‐posttreatment reductions in WASO as measured by diary and PSG predicted subsequent decreases in clinical pain. This effect was significantly greater for CBT‐I compared with behavioral desensitization. No significant changes in laboratory measures of pain modulation were observed. Conclusion: Compared with active placebo, CBT‐I was efficacious in reducing sleep maintenance insomnia. CBT‐I decreased clinical pain, but not pain modulation, suggesting that it has the potential to augment pain management in knee OA. Future work is needed to identify the mechanisms by which improved sleep reduces clinical pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.39048

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Smith, M. T., Finan, P. H., Buenaver, L. F., Robinson, M., Haque, U., Quain, A., McInrue, E., Han, D., Leoutsakis, J., & Haythornthwaite, J. A.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-27
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
1221-1233
ISSN
  • 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5205
OpenAlex
W2119685876
Cited by
159
References
23
FWCI
21.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Active Placebo–Controlled Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.39048
The paper
Smith, M. T., Finan, P. H., Buenaver, L. F., Robinson, M., Haque, U., Quain, A., McInrue, E., Han, D., Leoutsakis, J., & Haythornthwaite, J. A. (2015). Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Active Placebo–Controlled Clinical Trial. Arthritis & Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39048

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.