Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 666

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IgG4‐Related Disease: Clinical and Laboratory Features in One Hundred Twenty‐Five Patients

Open access
Wallace, Zachary S., Deshpande, Vikram, Mattoo, Hamid, Mahajan, Vinay S., Kulikova, Maria, Pillai, Shiv, Stone, John H.·2015·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective: IgG4‐related disease (IgG4‐RD) is an immune‐mediated fibroinflammatory condition that can affect nearly any organ. Prior studies have focused on individual cases of IgG4‐RD or small case series. This study was undertaken to report detailed clinical and laboratory findings in a larger group of patients with IgG4‐RD whose diagnosis was established by strict clinicopathologic correlation. Methods: The baseline features of 125 patients with biopsy‐proven IgG4‐RD were reviewed. The diagnosis was confirmed by pathologists’ review, based on consensus diagnostic criteria and correlation with clinicopathologic features. Disease activity and damage were assessed using the IgG4‐RD Responder Index (RI). Flow cytometry was used to assess levels of circulating plasmablasts. Results: Of the 125 patients, 107 had active disease and 86 were not receiving treatment for IgG4‐RD. Only 51% of the patients with active disease had elevated serum IgG4 concentrations. However, patients with active disease and elevated serum IgG4 concentrations were older, had a higher IgG4‐RD RI score, a greater number of organs involved, lower complement levels, higher absolute eosinophil counts, and higher IgE levels compared to those with active disease but normal serum IgG4 concentrations (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). The correlation between IgG4+ plasmablast levels and the IgG4‐RD RI of disease activity (Spearman's ρ = 0.45, P = 0.003) was stronger than the correlation between total plasmablast levels and the IgG4‐RD RI. Seventy‐six (61%) of the patients were male, but no significant differences according to sex were observed with regard to disease severity, organ involvement, or serum IgG4 concentrations. Treatment with glucocorticoids failed to produce sustained remission in 77% of patients. Conclusion: Nearly 50% of this patient cohort with biopsy‐proven, clinically active IgG4‐RD had normal serum IgG4 concentrations. Elevations in the serum IgG4 concentration appeared to identify a subset of patients with a more severe disease phenotype. In addition, the levels of IgG4+ plasmablasts correlated well with the extent of disease activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.39205

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 666

Metadata

Authors
Wallace, Z. S., Deshpande, V., Mattoo, H., Mahajan, V. S., Kulikova, M., Pillai, S., & Stone, J. H.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-26
Volume
67
Issue
9
Pages
2466-2475
ISSN
  • 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5205
OpenAlex
W1891160624
Cited by
666
References
30
FWCI
40.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IgG4‐Related Disease: Clinical and Laboratory Features in One Hundred Twenty‐Five Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.39205
The paper
Wallace, Z. S., Deshpande, V., Mattoo, H., Mahajan, V. S., Kulikova, M., Pillai, S., & Stone, J. H. (2015). IgG4‐Related Disease: Clinical and Laboratory Features in One Hundred Twenty‐Five Patients. Arthritis & Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.