Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,376

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential Diagnosis of Glomerular Disease: A Systematic and Inclusive Approach

Open access
Hebert, Lee A., Parikh, Samir, Prosek, Jason, Nadasdy, Tibor, Rovin, Brad H.·2013·American Journal of Nephrology

Abstract

Background: Glomerular disease is a complex and evolving topic. In evaluating a specific case it is not unusual for the clinician to ask: ‘Am I missing something? Should I biopsy? When? Should I treat first, then biopsy?' This work, which is both evidence and experience based, is intended to address each of these concerns and many other issues relevant to the differential diagnosis of glomerular disease. Summary: The central approach is the use of diagnostic algorithms that are based on quantitative measures routinely obtained early in the course of the diagnostic evaluation. The algorithms are designed to be easy to navigate, systematic, and inclusive. Also provided is a detailed and prioritized list of recommended diagnostic testing, and the rationale for each test. Key Message: This work is intended to facilitate accurate diagnosis in the individual patient presenting with evidence of glomerular disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000354390

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90302-8 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90302-8
  2. 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90488-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.04.014 · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.04.014
  4. 10.2215/CJN.04761107 · DOI
  5. 10.7326/0003-4819-106-5-719 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/ndt/gfr708 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr708
  7. 10.1093/ndt/gfs137 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfs137
  8. 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90956-7 · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(83)90956-7
  9. 10.1159/000145454 · DOI
  10. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.024 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1159/000312877 · doi:10.1159/000312877
  12. 10.1038/ki.2011.44 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1681/ASN.2010101110 · doi:10.1681/asn.2010101110
  14. 10.1093/ndt/gfr559 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr559
  15. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.11.029 · DOI
  16. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.08.050 · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.08.050
  17. 10.1038/ki.1996.23 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)90225-9 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90225-9
  19. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002038 · DOI
  20. 10.1053/snep.2003.50016 · DOI
  21. 10.1056/NEJM196610132751501 · doi:10.1056/nejm196610132751501
  22. 10.7326/0003-4819-66-2-345 · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-66-2-345
  23. 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90336-7 · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(89)90336-7
  24. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.12.053 · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.12.053
  25. 10.1681/ASN.2010050477 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/ki.2009.399 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2337/dc05-1788 · DOI
  28. 10.2337/diabetes.52.4.1036 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.2215/CJN.07610711 · DOI
  30. 10.1056/NEJM199110103251502 · doi:10.1056/nejm199110103251502
  31. 10.1159/000324762 · DOI
  32. 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32835200df · DOI
  33. 10.1002/art.1780400909 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1002/1529-0131(199809)41:9<1521::AID-ART2>3.0.CO;2-A · doi:10.1002/1529-0131(199809)41:9<1521::aid-art2>3.0.co;2-a
  35. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1991.tb08154.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.1991.tb08154.x
  36. 10.1038/ki.1994.239 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/sj.ki.5000387 · DOI
  38. 10.1136/ard.60.3.293 · doi:10.1136/ard.60.3.293
  39. 10.1191/0961203305lu2153cr · doi:10.1191/0961203305lu2153cr
  40. 10.1056/NEJMra1108178 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1056/NEJM197607222950402 · doi:10.1056/nejm197607222950402
  42. 10.1038/ki.1981.59 · doi:10.1038/ki.1981.59
  43. 10.1093/ndt/15.11.1782 · DOI
  44. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.10.055 · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.10.055
  45. 10.1681/ASN.2004080658 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1093/ndt/gfq443 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfq443
  47. 10.2215/CJN.09241010 · DOI
  48. 10.2215/CJN.09241010 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/ndt/gfr151 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr151
  50. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002421 · DOI
  51. 10.7326/0003-4819-139-4-200308190-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.11.025 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00453.x · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.06.008 · doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.06.008
  55. 10.1681/ASN.2010090969 · DOI
  56. 10.1056/NEJMoa0910975 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1001/jama.288.19.2421 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.2215/CJN.01030306 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2000.00356.x · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2000.00356.x
  60. 10.1056/NEJMra1104650 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.5858/arpa.2011-0565-RA · DOI
  62. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.01.020 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/ki.2011.399 · DOI
  64. 10.1681/ASN.2009010110 · doi:10.1681/asn.2009010110
  65. 10.1159/000232599 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/ki.2011.380 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/ki.2009.344 · DOI
  68. 10.1681/ASN.2008030292 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.10.013 · DOI
  70. 10.1053/j.ackd.2012.07.006 · DOI
  71. 10.2215/CJN.01480308 · DOI
  72. 10.1001/jama.290.8.1071 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1056/NEJM197507032930103 · doi:10.1056/nejm197507032930103

Cited by

See all 4,376

Metadata

Authors
Hebert, L. A., Parikh, S., Prosek, J., Nadasdy, T., & Rovin, B. H.
Venue
American Journal of Nephrology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
253-266
ISSN
  • 0250-8095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9670
OpenAlex
W2021988356
Cited by
4,376
References
12
FWCI
209.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Diagnosis of Glomerular Disease: A Systematic and Inclusive Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000354390
The paper
Hebert, L. A., Parikh, S., Prosek, J., Nadasdy, T., & Rovin, B. H. (2013). Differential Diagnosis of Glomerular Disease: A Systematic and Inclusive Approach. American Journal of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000354390

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.