Cited by 974scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsLibrary Science and Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar

Meho, Lokman I., Yang, Kiduk·2007·Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

DOI 10.1002/asi.20677

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Institute for Scientific Information's (ISI, now Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, PA) citation databases have been used for decades as a starting point and often as the only tools for locating citations and/or conducting citation analyses. The ISI databases (or Web of Science [WoS]), however, may no longer be sufficient because new databases and tools that allow citation searching are now available. Using citations to the work of 25 library and information science (LIS) faculty members as a case study, the authors examine the effects of using Scopus and Google Scholar (GS) on the citation counts and rankings of scholars as measured by WoS. Overall, more than 10,000 citing and purportedly citing documents were examined. Results show that Scopus significantly alters the relative ranking of those scholars that appear in the middle of the rankings and that GS stands out in its coverage of conference proceedings as well as international, non‐English language journals. The use of Scopus and GS, in addition to WoS, helps reveal a more accurate and comprehensive picture of the scholarly impact of authors. The WoS data took about 100 hours of collecting and processing time, Scopus consumed 200 hours, and GS a grueling 3,000 hours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.20677

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720 · cited 1×
“%) of all of the databases' 2,733 citations for the study group, reflecting the Matthew Effect in citations—a small number of sources attracts the lion's share of citations and a large number of sources receives relatively few (Merton, 1968).”
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770
Visualizing knowledge domains
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106 · Cited by 1,930
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Moed, H. F. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3714-7 · Cited by 1,493
Scholarly communication and bibliometrics
Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440360102 · Cited by 1,147
Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities
Wallin, J. A. (2005) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x · Cited by 913
Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6 · Cited by 760
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006) · Biomedical Digital Libraries · doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-7 · Cited by 752
What do we know about the h index?
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20609 · Cited by 672

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

Bar‐Ilan J., 2006, H‐index for Price medalists revisited, ISSI Newsletter, 2, 3
Börner K., 2006, Network science: A theoretical and practical framework, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40
Elsevier Science Publishers, 2006, Scopus [Electronic database]
Goodman D., 2005, Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus, The Charleston Advisor, 6
Retrieved February 15 2006 fromhttp://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/102/46/16569.
Jacsó P., 2005, As we may search—comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation‐based and citation‐enhanced databases, Current Science, 89, 1537
Narin F., 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity
Persson O., 2005, Most cited universities and authors in library & information Science 1990–2004, Bibliometric Notes, 7
Reed K.L., 1995, Citation analysis of faculty publications: Beyond Science Citation Index and Social Science [sic] Citation Index, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 83, 503
Thomson Scientific. (2006).Journal citation reports [Electronic database]. Philadelphia: Author.
Wleklinski J.M., 2005, Studying Google Scholar: Wall to wall coverage?, Online, 29, 22

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 973

The Distribution of the H‐index Among Academic Emergency Physicians in the United States
DeLuca, L., John, A. E. S., Stolz, U., Matheson, L., Simpson, A. G., & Denninghoff, K. R. (2013) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.12226 · Cited by 57
Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis
Chen, J., Lin, C., Peng, D., & Ge, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3043743 · Cited by 63
Predicting citation count ofBioinformaticspapers within four years of publication
Ibáñez, A., Larrañaga, P., & Bielza, C. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp585 · Cited by 57
Evaluation of the citation matching algorithms of CWTS and i FQ in comparison to the Web of science
Olensky, M., Schmidt, M., & van Eck, N. J. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23590 · Cited by 56
An Evaluation of Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar Citations in Operations Management
Chapman, K., & Ellinger, A. E. (2019) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-04-2019-0110 · Cited by 55
M icrosoft academic search and G oogle scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profiles
Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23036 · Cited by 56
Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates?
van der Pol, C. B., McInnes, M. D. F., Petrcich, W., Tunis, A. S., & Hanna, R. R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119892 · Cited by 55
The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Scopus
Jacsó, P. (2008) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520810897403 · Cited by 56
The development of an AI journal ranking based on the revealed preference approach
Serenko, A. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.04.001 · Cited by 56
Research impact and productivity of Southeast Asian countries in language and linguistics
Barrot, J. S. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2163-3 · Cited by 55
What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking
Bornmann, L., Butz, A., & Wohlrabe, K. (2017) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1332753 · Cited by 53
Scientometric analysis of scientific publications in CSCW
Correia, A., Paredes, H., & Fonseca, B. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2562-0 · Cited by 57
A review of comparative advertising research 1975–2018: Thematic and citation analyses
del Barrio‐García, S., Muñoz‐Leiva, F., & Golden, L. L. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.023 · Cited by 55
A systematic retrieval of international competitiveness literature: a bibliometric study
Olczyk, M. (2016) · Eurasian economic review : · doi:10.1007/s40822-016-0054-9 · Cited by 62
Google Scholar Metrics for Publications
Jacsó, P. (2012) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521211254121 · Cited by 53
Visualizing and mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval
Rorissa, A., & Yuan, X. (2011) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2011.03.004 · Cited by 51
The contributions of human resource development research across disciplines: A citation and content analysis
Jeung, C., Yoon, H. J., Park, S., & Jo, S. J. (2011) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.20062 · Cited by 53
Twenty years of the International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: a bibliometric overview
Wang, C., Lim, M. K., & Lyons, A. C. (2018) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2018.1526262 · Cited by 53
Disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion in science
Yan, E. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23541 · Cited by 52
A bibliometric analysis of occupational therapy publications
Brown, T., Gutman, S. A., Ho, Y.-S., & Fong, K. N. K. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1080/11038128.2017.1329344 · Cited by 51
Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations
Papageorgiou, S. N., Papadopoulos, M. A. A. P., & Athanasiou, A. E. (2013) · European Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjt008 · Cited by 51
Google Scholar como herramienta para la evaluación científica
Torres‐Salinas, D., Ruíz-Pérez, R., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2009) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2009.sep.03 · Cited by 50
A Systematic Literature Review of Sexual Harassment Studies with Text Mining
Karami, A., Spinel, M. Y., White, C. N., Ford, K., & Swan, S. C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126589 · Cited by 56
Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set
Radicchi, F., & Castellano, C. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1027-3 · Cited by 57
A bibliometric view on the use of total quality management in services
Zhang, C., Moreira, M. R. A., & Sousa, P. S. A. (2020) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2020.1732811 · Cited by 49
The Bibliometric Analysis on Finite Mixture Model
Phoong, S. Y., Khek, S. L., & Phoong, S. W. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221101039 · Cited by 48
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Organizational Justice and Project Performance: A Systematic Literature and Science Mapping Review
Zhang, X., Antwi‐Afari, M. F., Zhang, Y., & Xing, X. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14010259 · Cited by 68
Evaluation of h-index, its variants and extensions based on publication age & citation intensity in civil engineering
Raheel, M., Ayaz, S., & Afzal, M. T. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2633-2 · Cited by 48
Untangling the web of e-Research: Towards a sociology of online knowledge
Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.006 · Cited by 48
Do We Matter? Attention the General Public, Policymakers, and Academics Give to Accounting Research
Burton, F. G., Summers, S. L., Wilks, T. J., & Wood, D. A. (2020) · Issues in Accounting Education · doi:10.2308/issues-2020-017 · Cited by 48
Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis: A comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21495 · Cited by 48
The h-index in medical education: an analysis of medical education journal editorial boards
Doja, A., Eady, K., Horsley, T., Bould, M. D., Victor, J. C., & Sampson, M. (2014) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-014-0251-8 · Cited by 48
Private label management: A literature review
Wu, L., Yang, W., & Wu, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.032 · Cited by 49
Self‐selection and the citation advantage of open access articles
Xia, J., & Nakanishi, K. (2012) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521211206953 · Cited by 47
The conundrum of research productivity: a study on sociologists in Italy
Akbaritabar, A., Casnici, N., & Squazzoni, F. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2606-5 · Cited by 54
Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation Index
Torres‐Salinas, D., Sánchez, R. M. R., Robinson‐García, N., Fdez-Valdivia, J., & García, J. A. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.004 · Cited by 46
Emotions and Sport Management: A Bibliometric Overview
Baier-Fuentes, H., González‐Serrano, M. H., Santos, M. A. D., Inzunza-Mendoza, W., & Pozo-Estrada, V. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01512 · Cited by 50
Physical Exercise in the Context of Air Pollution: An Emerging Research Topic
You, Y., Wang, D., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Ma, X., & Li, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.784705 · Cited by 53
Tale of Three Databases: The Implication of Coverage Demonstrated for a Sample Query
Bar-Ilan, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2018.00006 · Cited by 43
A systematic literature review of circular supply chain network design: application of optimization models
Shahsavani, I., & Goli, A. (2023) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-023-03362-2 · Cited by 45
A systematic literature review of modern slavery in supply chain management: State of the art, framework development and research opportunities
Strand, V., Lotfi, M., Flynn, A., & Walker, H. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140301 · Cited by 45
The world wide web of research and access to knowledge
Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2009) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1057/kmrp.2009.13 · Cited by 45
Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines
Yan, E. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23106 · Cited by 45
IoT Services and Applications in Rehabilitation: An Interdisciplinary and Meta-Analysis Review
Gradim, L. C. C., José, M. A., da Cruz, D. M. C., & Lopes, R. D. D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2020.3005616 · Cited by 50
A reception study of the articles published in English for Specific Purposes from 1990–1999
Swales, J. M., & Leeder, C. (2011) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.07.003 · Cited by 44
Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still find use for libraries
Wu, M., & Chen, S.-C. (2014) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-08-2012-0102 · Cited by 44
Visualizing Music Psychology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Psychology of Music, Music Perception, and Musicae Scientiae from 1973 to 2017
Anglada-Tort, M., & Sanfilippo, K. R. M. (2019) · Music & Science · doi:10.1177/2059204318811786 · Cited by 44
Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar
Chertow, M. R., Kanaoka, K. S., & Park, J. (2021) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13099 · Cited by 53
How to measure the size of a bio-based economy: Evidence from Flanders
Vandermeulen, V., Prins, W., Nolte, S. H., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.08.007 · Cited by 43
Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan
Chen, K., Tang, M., Wang, C., & Hsiang, J. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1420-6 · Cited by 49
The H-index in Life and Health Sciences: Advantages, Drawbacks and Challenging Opportunities
Dinis‐Oliveira, R. J. (2019) · Current Drug Research Reviews · doi:10.2174/258997751102191111141801 · Cited by 44
Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences
Li, J., & Li, Y. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1471-8 · Cited by 42
Ten challenges in modeling bibliographic data for bibliometric analysis
Ferrara, A., & Salini, S. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0810-x · Cited by 42
Effects of Copyrights on Science: Evidence from the WWII Book Republication Program
Biasi, B., & Moser, P. (2021) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20190113 · Cited by 42
Errors of omission and their implications for computing scientometric measures in evaluating the publishing productivity and impact of countries
Jacsó, P. (2009) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520910951276 · Cited by 40
Brand relationship and personality theory
Avis, M., Aitken, R., & Ferguson, S. (2012) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593112451396 · Cited by 42
Collaborator recommendation in interdisciplinary computer science using degrees of collaborative forces, temporal evolution of research interest, and comparative seniority status
Chaiwanarom, P., & Lursinsap, C. (2014) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.11.029 · Cited by 41
Two Different Perspectives on Open Innovation – Libre versus Control
Wikhamn, B. R. (2013) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12035 · Cited by 42
Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluation
Mingers, J., & Meyer, M. S. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2415-x · Cited by 45
Open science in sport and exercise psychology: Review of current approaches and considerations for qualitative inquiry
Tamminen, K. A., & Poucher, Z. A. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.12.010 · Cited by 48
Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals
Brown, T., & Gutman, S. A. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1080/11038128.2018.1473489 · Cited by 41
The Intellectual Structure of Social and Sustainable Public Procurement Research: A Co-Citation Analysis
Torres-Pruñonosa, J., Plaza-Navas, M. À., Diéz‐Martín, F., & Beltran-Cangrós, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020774 · Cited by 49
Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science
Michels, C., & Junying, F. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1309-4 · Cited by 41
Revisitinghmeasured on UK LIS and IR academics
Sanderson, M. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20771 · Cited by 41
Knowledge management and Industry 4.0: a critical analysis and future agenda
Ribeiro, V. B., Nakano, D., Muniz, J., & de Oliveira, R. B. (2022) · Gestão & Produção · doi:10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e5222 · Cited by 40
Country Comparisons of Human Stroke Research Since 2001
Asplund, K., Eriksson, M., & Persson, O. (2012) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.637249 · Cited by 40
Use of Scopus and Google Scholar to measure social sciences production in four major Spanish universities
Etxebarria, G., & Uranga, M. G. (2009) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0043-9 · Cited by 40
Re‐Ranking the Top Female Academic “Stars” in Criminology and Criminal Justice Using an Alternative Method: A Research Note
Khey, D. N., Jennings, W. G., Higgins, G. E., Schoepfer, A., & Langton, L. L. (2010) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2010.517655 · Cited by 40
Exploring high impact scholarship in research on student's evaluation of teaching (SET)
Spooren, P., Vandermoere, F., Vanderstraeten, R., & Pepermans, K. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.001 · Cited by 45
Alignment: the foundation of effective strategy execution
Srivastava, A. K., & Sushil, N. A. (2017) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-11-2015-0172 · Cited by 40
Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set
Castellano, C., & Radicchi, F. (2013) · Cited by 40
The most cited works in major depression: The ‘Citation classics’
Lipsman, N., & Lozano, A. M. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.031 · Cited by 40
Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals
Thelwall, M. A., & Kousha, K. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20803 · Cited by 40
Research Trends in Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives: A Bibliometric Review
Qorri, D., & Felföldi, J. (2024) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture14020199 · Cited by 39
The diffusion of H-related literature
Zhang, L., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2011) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.004 · Cited by 39
Journal impact evaluation: a webometric perspective
Thelwall, M. A. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0669-x · Cited by 39
Locating geographies of inequality: publication trends across OECD countries
Cavanaugh, A., & Breau, S. (2017) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1371292 · Cited by 39
The 1000 Most Cited Papers on Visible Nonverbal Behavior: A Bibliometric Analysis
Plusquellec, P., & Denault, V. (2018) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-018-0280-9 · Cited by 39
Does the web of science accurately represent chinese scientific performance?
Shu, F., Julien, C., & Larivière, V. (2019) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24184 · Cited by 39
Enhancing technological sustainability in academia: leveraging ChatGPT for teaching, learning and evaluation
Isiaku, L., Muhammad, A. S., Kefas, H. I., & Ukaegbu, F. C. (2024) · Quality Education for All · doi:10.1108/qea-07-2024-0055 · Cited by 66
Anne-Wil Harzing: The publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis
Bensman, S. J. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0388-8 · Cited by 38
Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: is it too little, too late?
Jacsó, P. (2012) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521211209581 · Cited by 38
A bibliometric analysis of emergency management using information systems (2000-2016)
Du, H. S., Ke, X., Chu, S. K. W., & Chan, L. T. (2017) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-05-2017-0142 · Cited by 38
An overview of iris recognition: a bibliometric analysis of the period 2000–2012
Alvarez-Betancourt, Y., & García-Silvente, M. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1336-1 · Cited by 38
Ranking Accounting Journals by Topical Area and Methodology
Barrick, J. A., Mecham, N. W., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2016) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2848560 · Cited by 38
Computer science research in Malaysia: a bibliometric analysis
Bakri, A., & Willett, P. (2011) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/00012531111135727 · Cited by 38
Predictive power of conference-related factors on citation rates of conference papers
Lee, D. H. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2943-z · Cited by 38
Moral Education (2010-2019): A Bibliometric Study (Part 1)
Julia, J., Supriatna, E., Isrok’atun, I., Aisyah, I. S., Nuryani, R., & Odebode, A. A. (2020) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.080639 · Cited by 37
Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda
Cao, M., & Alon, I. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12176901 · Cited by 37
How are exclusively data journals indexed in major scholarly databases? An examination of four databases
Jiao, C., Li, K., & Fang, Z. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02625-x · Cited by 57
The end of the beginning: a reflection on the first five years of the HRI conference
Bartneck, C. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0281-x · Cited by 37
Publishing Trends in Library and Information Sciences Across European Countries and Institutions
Olmeda‐Gómez, C., & Anegón, F. D. M. (2015) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.10.005 · Cited by 38
Active Ageing: Mapping of Scientific Coverage
Álvarez‐García, J., Durán‐Sánchez, A., del Río‐Rama, M. D. L. C., & García-Vélez, D. F. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15122727 · Cited by 38
Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT): Principles, Processes and Protocols
Madakam, S., & Uchiya, T. (2019) · Computer communications and networks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24892-5_2 · Cited by 36
The demise of the ARC journal ranking scheme: an ex post analysis of the accounting and finance journals
Moosa, I. A. (2011) · Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1467-629x.2011.00432.x · Cited by 36
Digital technologies for resource loop redesign in circular supply chains: A systematic literature review
Massari, G. F., Nacchiero, R., & Giannoccaro, I. (2023) · Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances · doi:10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200189 · Cited by 54
JASIST 2001–2010
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/bult.2012.1720380607 · Cited by 35
How is an academic social site populated? A demographic study of Google Scholar Citations population
Ortega, J. L. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1593-7 · Cited by 35
Highly Cited Articles in Environmental and Occupational Health, 1919–1960
SMITH, D. R. (2009) · Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health · doi:10.1080/19338240903286743 · Cited by 35
Users’ design feedback in usability evaluation: a literature review
Følstad, A. (2017) · Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences · doi:10.1186/s13673-017-0100-y · Cited by 35

Authors: Meho, L. I., & Yang, K.
Affiliations: Indiana University Bloomington (US)
ORCID: Meho, Lokman I.
Yang, Kiduk
Venue: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2007-08-30
Volume: 58
Issue: 13
Pages: 2105-2125
ISSN: 1532-2882 (ISSN-L)
1532-2890
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20677
OpenAlex: W4255356361
Cited by: 974
References: 53
Citations by year: 2026: 31 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 53
FWCI: 42.91
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Keywords: citation indexes, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, library and information science faculty, citation counts, scholar ranking, citation analysis, database coverage, non-English-language journals, scholarly impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks