Cited by 974scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsLibrary Science and Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar

Meho, Lokman I., Yang, Kiduk·2007·Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

DOI 10.1002/asi.20677

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Institute for Scientific Information's (ISI, now Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, PA) citation databases have been used for decades as a starting point and often as the only tools for locating citations and/or conducting citation analyses. The ISI databases (or Web of Science [WoS]), however, may no longer be sufficient because new databases and tools that allow citation searching are now available. Using citations to the work of 25 library and information science (LIS) faculty members as a case study, the authors examine the effects of using Scopus and Google Scholar (GS) on the citation counts and rankings of scholars as measured by WoS. Overall, more than 10,000 citing and purportedly citing documents were examined. Results show that Scopus significantly alters the relative ranking of those scholars that appear in the middle of the rankings and that GS stands out in its coverage of conference proceedings as well as international, non‐English language journals. The use of Scopus and GS, in addition to WoS, helps reveal a more accurate and comprehensive picture of the scholarly impact of authors. The WoS data took about 100 hours of collecting and processing time, Scopus consumed 200 hours, and GS a grueling 3,000 hours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.20677

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720 · cited 1×
“%) of all of the databases' 2,733 citations for the study group, reflecting the Matthew Effect in citations—a small number of sources attracts the lion's share of citations and a large number of sources receives relatively few (Merton, 1968).”
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
Garfield, E. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90 · Cited by 2,770
Visualizing knowledge domains
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440370106 · Cited by 1,930
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Moed, H. F. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3714-7 · Cited by 1,493
Scholarly communication and bibliometrics
Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440360102 · Cited by 1,147
Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities
Wallin, J. A. (2005) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x · Cited by 913
Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6 · Cited by 760
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006) · Biomedical Digital Libraries · doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-7 · Cited by 752
What do we know about the h index?
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20609 · Cited by 672

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

Bar‐Ilan J., 2006, H‐index for Price medalists revisited, ISSI Newsletter, 2, 3
Börner K., 2006, Network science: A theoretical and practical framework, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40
Elsevier Science Publishers, 2006, Scopus [Electronic database]
Goodman D., 2005, Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus, The Charleston Advisor, 6
Retrieved February 15 2006 fromhttp://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/102/46/16569.
Jacsó P., 2005, As we may search—comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation‐based and citation‐enhanced databases, Current Science, 89, 1537
Narin F., 1976, Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity
Persson O., 2005, Most cited universities and authors in library & information Science 1990–2004, Bibliometric Notes, 7
Reed K.L., 1995, Citation analysis of faculty publications: Beyond Science Citation Index and Social Science [sic] Citation Index, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 83, 503
Thomson Scientific. (2006).Journal citation reports [Electronic database]. Philadelphia: Author.
Wleklinski J.M., 2005, Studying Google Scholar: Wall to wall coverage?, Online, 29, 22

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 973

Australian Education Journals: Quantitative and Qualitative Indicators
Haddow, G., & Genoni, P. (2009) · Australian Academic & Research Libraries · doi:10.1080/00048623.2009.10721388 · Cited by 15
Connecting the dots: A systematic review of corporate social responsibility, information asymmetry, and economic implications
Wang, Y., Albitar, K., & Chbib, I. (2024) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2843 · Cited by 14
Green buildings and digital technologies: A pathway to sustainable development
Manzoor, B., Antwi‐Afari, M. F., & Alotaibi, K. S. (2025) · Green Technologies and Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.grets.2025.100243 · Cited by 20
The Academic Inbreeding Controversy: Analysis and Evidence from Brazil
Borenstein, D., Perlin, M., & Imasato, T. (2022) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2022.101287 · Cited by 15
The Intellectual Structure of Esports Research
Jordan-Vallverdú, V., Plaza-Navas, M. À., Raya, J. M., & Torres-Pruñonosa, J. (2023) · Entertainment Computing · doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100628 · Cited by 14
Enricher learning: Bridging the gap between academics and practicing accounting professionals
Thottoli, M. M., Islam, M. A., Abdullah, A., Hassan, M. S., & Ibrahim, S. (2024) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2024.2366787 · Cited by 14
Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w świetle analiz bibliometrycznych i opinii pracowników na temat równowagi między życiem zawodowym a prywatnym
Żemigała, M. (2013) · doi:10.7172/2013.wwz.5 · Cited by 15
Infraestrutura verde: conceitos, tipologias e terminologia no Brasil
dos Santos, M. F. N., & Enokibara, M. (2021) · Paisagem e Ambiente · doi:10.11606/issn.2359-5361.paam.2021.174804 · Cited by 14
A systematic mapping study addressing the reliability of mobile applications: The need to move beyond testing reliability
Wimalasooriya, C., Licorish, S. A., da Costa, D. A., & MacDonell, S. G. (2021) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2021.111166 · Cited by 14
Analysis of Trends in the Application of Augmented Reality in Students with ASD: InTellectual, Social and Conceptual Structure of Scientific Production Through WOS and Scopus
Lorenzo, G., Cerdá, A. G., Lorenzo-Lledó‬, ‪., & Lorenzo-Lledó‬, ‪. (2022) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-021-09582-7 · Cited by 16
Trends of publications on transformational leadership in nursing: a bibliometric analysis
Aydoğdu, A. L. F. (2023) · Leadership in health services · doi:10.1108/lhs-01-2023-0002 · Cited by 14
Trends in literature on new oilseed crops and related species: Seeking evidence of increasing or waning interest
Cruz, V. M. V., & Dierig, D. A. (2012) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.029 · Cited by 14
The research impact of school psychology faculty
Watkins, M. W., & Chan-Park, C. Y. (2015) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2015.03.003 · Cited by 14
Research impact benchmarks for tourism, hospitality and events scholars in Australia and New Zealand
Benckendorff, P. J., & Shu, M. (2018) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.04.005 · Cited by 14
VR content and its prosocial impact: predictors, moderators, and mediators of media effects. A systematic literature review
Martínez-Cano, F.-J., Lachman, R., & Canet, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2023.1203242 · Cited by 16
Navigating the landscape of e-commerce: thematic clusters, intellectual turning points, and burst patterns in online reputation management
López-López, D., Plaza-Navas, M., Torres-Pruñonosa, J., & Martinez, L. F. (2024) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-024-09893-8 · Cited by 10
Webometric analysis of departments of librarianship and information science: a follow-up study
Arakaki, M., & Willett, P. (2008) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551508094051 · Cited by 13
The Most Frequently Cited Topics in Urban Planning Scholarship
Sanchez, T. W. (2020) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci4010004 · Cited by 12
Cross-cutting best practices for new product development (NPD) in turbulent environments: the effects of integration and co-creation
Panizzon, M., Vidor, G., & Camargo, M. E. (2021) · Innovation & Management Review · doi:10.1108/inmr-04-2020-0053 · Cited by 13
Mapping the intellectual structure of business-to-business loyalty literature: a bibliometric analysis approach
Kittur, P. V., Chatterjee, S., & Upadhyay, A. (2021) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-02-2021-0093 · Cited by 13
What Kinesiology Research is Most Visible to the Academic World?
Knudson, D. V. (2022) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2022.2092880 · Cited by 15
Evaluating a department’s research: Testing the Leiden methodology in business and management
Mingers, J., & Lipitakis, E. (2013) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.11.002 · Cited by 13
Twenty-five years of Australian nursing and allied health professional journals: bibliometric analysis from 1985 through 2010
Wiles, L., Olds, T., & Williams, M. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0704-y · Cited by 13
Sustentabilidad en México un análisis bibliométrico de la investigación científica presentada en los últimos 28 años
García-Orozco, D., Moreno, I. C. E., Alfaro-García, V. G., & Merigó, J. M. (2020) · Inquietud Empresarial · doi:10.19053/01211048.11479 · Cited by 13
A bibliometric analysis on scientific production of Geographical Information System (GIS) in Web of Science
Mohamad, A. N., Masrek, M. N., & Rasam, A. R. A. (2013) · doi:10.1109/icoict.2013.6574584 · Cited by 13
The nature of publishing and assessment in Geography and Environmental Studies: evidence from the Research Assessment Exercise 2008
Richards, K., Batty, M., Edwards, K. J., Findlay, A. M., Foody, G. M., Frostick, L. E., Jones, K., Lee, R., LIVINGSTONE, D. N., Marsden, T., et al. (2009) · Area · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00908.x · Cited by 13
Withstanding the test of time: The 1978 semantic word norms
Toglia, M. P. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.2.531 · Cited by 13
Effects of Copyrights on Science - Evidence from the US Book Republication Program
Biasi, B., & Moser, P. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24255 · Cited by 13
Trends and advancements in fish anaesthesia over the last decade
Minaz, M., & Félix, L. M. (2025) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743147 · Cited by 12
How southern is Southern criminology in Latin America?
Galleguillos, S. (2023) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806231213953 · Cited by 12
Navigating sustainability: key factors in prioritising Sustainable Development Goals
Asadikia, A., Rajabifard, A., & Kalantari, M. (2024) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-024-01561-y · Cited by 15
Two decades of cross-border mergers and acquisitions research: A bibliometric analysis
Jain, A., Kashiramka, S., & Jain, S. (2024) · Review of International Business and Strategy · doi:10.1108/ribs-04-2024-0034 · Cited by 14
Global Benchmarking of Marketing Doctoral Program Faculty and Institutions by Subarea
Elbeck, M., & Schee, B. A. V. (2013) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/0273475313514234 · Cited by 12
Research on sharing economy: why are some articles more cited than others?
Marin-Anglada, Q., & Hernández‐Lara, A. B. (2019) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2019.1694427 · Cited by 12
Public Sector Reform from the Post-New Public Management Perspective: Review and Bibliometric Analysis
Ropret, M., & Aristovnik, A. (2019) · Central European Public Administration Review · doi:10.17573/cepar.2019.2.05 · Cited by 12
An overview of the most influential journals in fuzzy systems research
García-Orozco, D., Alfaro-García, V. G., Merigó, J. M., Moreno, I. C. E., & Monge, R. G. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117090 · Cited by 12
Examining the state of empirical business intelligence and analytics research: A poly-theoretic approach
Andoh‐Baidoo, F. K., Chavarría, J. A., Jones, M. C., Wang, Y., & Takieddine, S. (2022) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2022.103677 · Cited by 19
An intellectual structure of activity-based costing: a co-citation analysis
Kuo, H.-K., & Yang, C. (2014) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-03-2012-0027 · Cited by 12
Consensus‐based journal rankings: A complementary tool for bibliometric evaluation
Aledo, J. A., Gámez, J. A., Molina, D., & Suárez, A. R. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24040 · Cited by 12
The collaborative effect of scientific meetings: A study of the International Milk Genomics Consortium
Kwok, E., Porter, M., Korf, I. F., Pasin, G., German, J. B., & Lemay, D. G. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201637 · Cited by 12
Mapping research fields using co-nomination: the case of hyper-authorship heavy flavour physics
Karaulova, M., Nedeva, M., & Thomas, D. A. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03538-x · Cited by 12
Exploring the invisible college of citizen science: questions, methods and contributions
Hajibayova, L., Coladangelo, L. P., & Soyka, H. A. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04050-6 · Cited by 12
Can we do better than existing author citation metrics?
Finch, A. (2010) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201000053 · Cited by 12
Academic Libraries and Open Access Strategies
Burns, C. S. (2014) · Advances in library administration and organization · doi:10.1108/s0732-0671(2014)0000032003 · Cited by 12
The Importance of Conference Proceedings in Research Evaluation: A Methodology for Assessing Conference Impact
Kochetkov, D. M., Birukou, A., & Ermolayeva, A. M. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97110-6_28 · Cited by 11
Assessing Faculty Productivity by Research Impact: Introducing Dp2 Index
Dev, C. S., Parsa, H. G., Parsa, R. A., & Bujisic, M. (2015) · Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism · doi:10.1080/15313220.2015.1026471 · Cited by 11
Ranking of finance journals: a stochastic dominance analysis
Kao, E. H.-C., Hsu, C.-H., Lu, Y., & Fung, H. (2016) · Managerial Finance · doi:10.1108/mf-04-2015-0125 · Cited by 11
Tudománymetria és neveléstudomány
Nagy, G. (2016) · Iskolakultúra · doi:10.17543/iskkult.2016.2.50 · Cited by 11
Mining Google Scholar Citations: An Exploratory Study
Huang, Z., & Yuan, B. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31588-6_24 · Cited by 11
Benchmarking citation measures among the Australian education professoriate
Albion, P. (2012) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-012-0060-1 · Cited by 11
Publications of Australian LIS Academics in Database
Wilson, C. S., Boell, S. K., Kennan, M. A., & Patricia Willard, A. (2011) · Australian Academic & Research Libraries · doi:10.1080/00048623.2011.10722233 · Cited by 11
Efficiency analysis of forestry journals: Suggestions for improving journals’ quality
Petridis, K., Malesios, C., Arabatzis, G., & Thanassoulis, E. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.02.002 · Cited by 11
On evaluating the quality of a computer science/computer engineering conference
Loizides, O.-S., & Koutsakis, P. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.03.008 · Cited by 14
Statistical methods in Kansei engineering studies
Almagro, L. M. (2011) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-94644 · Cited by 11
Towards Scientists and Researchers Classification Model (SRCM)-based machine learning and data mining methods: An ISM-MICMAC approach
Noaman, A. Y. M., Gad-Elrab, A. A. A., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100516 · Cited by 16
Mapping Trends in Urban Livability Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis
Qelichi, M. M., Ghasemi, K., Tepe, E., & Murgante, B. (2025) · Journal of Planning Literature · doi:10.1177/08854122241312181 · Cited by 10
Research Publishing by Library and Information Science Scholars in Pakistan: A Bibliometric Analysis
Ali, M. Y., & Richardson, J. (2016) · Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice · doi:10.1633/jistap.2016.4.1.1 · Cited by 10
Indices bibliométriques et revues francophones de kinésithérapie
Gedda, M. (2018) · Kinésithérapie la Revue · doi:10.1016/j.kine.2018.02.004 · Cited by 10
AGILITY IN MARKETING: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
Thümler, N. (2023) · Verslas teorija ir praktika · doi:10.3846/btp.2023.17090 · Cited by 10
Capturing Citation Activity in Three Health Sciences Departments: A Comparison Study of Scopus and Web of Science
Sarkozy, A., Slyman, A., & Wu, W. G. (2015) · Medical Reference Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/02763869.2015.1019747 · Cited by 10
Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact: bibliometric analysis of the proceedings of the human–robot interaction conference
Bartneck, C. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2176-y · Cited by 10
Is Google Scholar useful for the evaluation of non‐English scientific journals? The case of Chinese journals
Zhang, Y., & Lun, H. (2018) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1208 · Cited by 10
Forest Landscape Restoration and Local Stakeholders: A Global Bibliometric Mapping Analysis
Fernandes, A. A., Adams, C., de Araujo, L. G., Romanelli, J. P., Santos, J. P. B., & Rodrigues, R. R. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142316165 · Cited by 10
Korean scholarly information analysis based on Korea Science Citation Database (KSCD)
Choi, H.-N., Kim, B., Jung, Y., & Choi, S.-H. (2013) · Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management · doi:10.1080/09737766.2013.802625 · Cited by 10
Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics
Tetsworth, K. D., Fraser, D., Glatt, V., & Hohmann, E. (2017) · Journal of orthopaedic surgery · doi:10.1177/2309499017690322 · Cited by 10
Analysis of the citation impact of national journals toward SCIE journals on JCR ranking
Kim, B., Kim, Y., & Kang, J.-H. (2018) · Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science · doi:10.22452/mjlis.vol23no2.1 · Cited by 10
The Usefulness of Data from Web of Science and Scopus Databases for Analyzing the State of a Scientific Discipline. The Case of Library and Information Science
Osiński, Z. (2018) · Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne · doi:10.36702/zin.469 · Cited by 10
Relative Performance Measurement of Researchers: The Impact of Data Source Selection
Meyer, M., Waldkirch, R. W., & Zaggl, M. A. (2012) · Schmalenbach Business Review · doi:10.1007/bf03396844 · Cited by 10
A bibliometric analysis of the application of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway in cancer
Deng, Z., Qing, Q., & Huang, B. (2024) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-024-03112-9 · Cited by 10
How to improve mental health in the older adults through AI-enhanced physical activity: an emerging research topic
Fang, W., Fan, S., Zheng, H., Fang, Z., You, Y., Yin, B., Li, B., & Ye, X. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05155-6 · Cited by 11
Trend and pattern of Agri-food Waste, Environmental Sustainability and Circular Economy Studies: A Science Mapping Review
Roy, M., Akbar, D., Rahman, A., & Rajapaksa, D. (2025) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-025-00647-8 · Cited by 9
QUANTIFYING AND MAPPING THE EVOLUTION OF A LEADER JOURNAL IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Tang, M., Liao, H., Yepes, V., Laurinavičius, A., & Tūpėnaitė, L. (2021) · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · doi:10.3846/jcem.2021.14365 · Cited by 9
Bibliometric analysis of literature on narrative discourse in corporate annual reports (1990–2019)
Qian, Y., & Sun, Y. (2021) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01135-5 · Cited by 9
The application of augmented reality in the learning of autistic students: a systematic and thematic review in 1996–2020
Lorenzo, G., Cerdá, A. G., Lorenzo-Lledó‬, ‪., & Carreres, A. L. (2022) · Journal of Enabling Technologies · doi:10.1108/jet-12-2021-0068 · Cited by 11
Rebound effects of energy efficiency improvement based on computable general equilibrium models: a systematic review
Huang, W., Miao, J., & Wei, T. (2023) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-023-10148-y · Cited by 9
Tracing policy diffusion: Identifying main paths in policy citation networks
Ba, Z., Tang, Y. G., Liu, X., & Xia, Y. (2023) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515231189660 · Cited by 9
Business continuity management: trends, structures and future issues
Widianti, T., Dinaseviani, A., Ayundyahrini, M., Sumaedi, S., Rakhmawati, T., Astrini, N. J., Bakti, I., Damayanti, S., Yarmen, M., Jati, R. K., et al. (2024) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-01-2024-0046 · Cited by 9
Citation analysis for the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries
Parker, J., Doulman, D. J., & Collins, J. (2009) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.05.003 · Cited by 9
Ambiguity, Bias, and Compromise: An Abc of Bibliometric-Based Performance Indicators
Todd, P. A. (2009) · Environment and Planning A Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a424 · Cited by 9
Scientific publishing in Benin as seen from Scopus
Mêgnigbêto, E. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0843-1 · Cited by 11
A bibliometric study of Video Retrieval Evaluation Benchmarking (TRECVid): A methodological analysis
Thornley, C., McLoughlin, S., Johnson, A. C., & Smeaton, A. F. (2011) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551511420032 · Cited by 9
The impact of quantitative research in social work
Sheppard, M. (2017) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1341386 · Cited by 9
Estudio bibliométrico y de impacto de la Revista Complutense de Educación (2005-2015)
Cano, E. V., Montoro, M. R. B., & Bravo, C. B. (2017) · Revista Complutense de Educación · doi:10.5209/rced.51672 · Cited by 9
Protocol: Is there agreement or disagreement between the absolute and relative impact indices obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus data?
Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2018) · WPOM - Working Papers on Operations Management · doi:10.4995/wpom.v9i1.8989 · Cited by 9
Google Scholar Citation metrics of Pakistani LIS scholars: an overview
Ali, M. Y., & Richardson, J. (2019) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-03-2018-0025 · Cited by 9
Measuring scientific impact of fisheries and aquaculture research-for-development projects in South East Asia and the Pacific
Hiruy, K., Murphy, R., Lewis, T. E., White, W. T., & Purcell, S. W. (2019) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvz019 · Cited by 10
Global Research Trends of Gender-Related Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Between 2001–2020: A Bibliometric Study
Yoon, H. Y., Lee, H., Yee, J., & Gwak, H. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.868040 · Cited by 9
Impact of h-index on author’s rankings: an improvement to the h-index for lower-ranked authors
Khurana, P., & Sharma, K. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04464-w · Cited by 13
Bibliometrics and University Research Rankings Demystified for Librarians
Pagell, R. A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54812-3_10 · Cited by 13
First citation speed for articles in Psychology of Music
Hancock, C. B., & Price, H. E. (2016) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735616637133 · Cited by 9
A Comparison Study of Impact Factor in Web of Science and Scopus Databases for Engineering Education and Educational Technology Journals
Chou, P. (2012) · Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology · doi:10.28945/1615 · Cited by 9
An analysis of perceived usefulness of Google Scholar by the postgraduate students of the University of Ilorin, Nigeria
Tella, A., Oyewole, M., & Tella, A. (2017) · South African journal of information management · doi:10.4102/sajim.v19i1.793 · Cited by 9
Research output and impact of the fields of management, economics, and sociology in spain and france: An analysis using google scholar and scopus
Gantman, E. R., & Dabos, M. P. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24020 · Cited by 9
The first impression of conference papers: Does it matter in predicting future citations?
Lee, D. H., & Brusilovsky, P. L. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24100 · Cited by 9
Are design for disassembly principles advantageous for the environment when applied to temporary exhibition installations?
Toniolo, S., Camana, D., Guidolin, A., Aguiari, F., & Scipioni, A. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.016 · Cited by 9
Critical Success Factors for Implementing Digital Twin Technology in Construction Projects: A Systematic and Bibliometric Approach
Manzoor, B., Antwi‐Afari, M. F., Alotaibi, K. S., Edwards, D. J., & Posillico, J. J. (2025) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-17248 · Cited by 10
Exploring alternative cyberbibliometrics for evaluation of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan
Tang, M., Wang, C., Chen, K., & Hsiang, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/meet.14504901060 · Cited by 8
Using Google Scholar citations to rank accounting programs: a global perspective
Chan, J. Y., Chan, K. C., Tong, J. Y., & Zhang, F. F. (2014) · Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting · doi:10.1007/s11156-014-0493-x · Cited by 8
Science Mapping of Meta-Analysis in Agricultural Science
Ding, W., Li, J., Ma, H., Wu, Y., & He, H. (2023) · Information · doi:10.3390/info14110611 · Cited by 8
A Study on Journal Impact Measurement with Hirsch-type Indices
Kim, P., & Lee, J. Y. (2010) · Journal of the Korean Society for information Management · doi:10.3743/kosim.2010.27.1.269 · Cited by 8

Authors: Meho, L. I., & Yang, K.
Affiliations: Indiana University Bloomington (US)
ORCID: Meho, Lokman I.
Yang, Kiduk
Venue: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2007-08-30
Volume: 58
Issue: 13
Pages: 2105-2125
ISSN: 1532-2882 (ISSN-L)
1532-2890
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20677
OpenAlex: W4255356361
Cited by: 974
References: 53
Citations by year: 2026: 31 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 53
FWCI: 42.91
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Keywords: citation indexes, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, library and information science faculty, citation counts, scholar ranking, citation analysis, database coverage, non-English-language journals, scholarly impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks