The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2005: Content analysis of journal articles
Abstract
This article first analyzes library and information science ( LIS ) research articles published in core LIS journals in 2005. It also examines the development of LIS from 1965 to 2005 in light of comparable data sets for 1965, 1985, and 2005. In both cases, the authors report (a) how the research articles are distributed by topic and (b) what approaches, research strategies, and methods were applied in the articles. In 2005, the largest research areas in LIS by this measure were information storage and retrieval, scientific communication, library and information‐service activities, and information seeking. The same research areas constituted the quantitative core of LIS in the previous years since 1965. Information retrieval has been the most popular area of research over the years. The proportion of research on library and information‐service activities decreased after 1985, but the popularity of information seeking and of scientific communication grew during the period studied. The viewpoint of research has shifted from library and information organizations to end users and development of systems for the latter. The proportion of empirical research strategies was high and rose over time, with the survey method being the single most important method. However, attention to evaluation and experiments increased considerably after 1985. Conceptual research strategies and system analysis, description, and design were quite popular, but declining. The most significant changes from 1965 to 2005 are the decreasing interest in library and information‐service activities and the growth of research into information seeking and scientific communication.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even though comprehensive literature reviews in LIS such as the one undertaken by Tuomaala, Järvelin & Vakkari (op.cit) indicate that this has been a blind spot in library and information science research.”
From Public libraries as an infrastructure for a sustainable public sphere (2019) · cites this paper as Tuomaala et al. 2014
In the citing paper
“Tuomaala, Järvelin & Vakkari classified 1 per cent of the articles in 1965, 9 per cent in 1985 and 6 per cent in 2005 as belonging to the societal level – very small proportions indeed.”
From Public libraries as an infrastructure for a sustainable public sphere (2019) · cites this paper as Tuomaala et al. 2014
Citations
Cites
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312450709336664 · Cited by 4,225 · cited 1×
“As Hayes and Krippendorff (2007) have noted, this relatively rarely used algorithm is one of the most sophisticated methods for calculation of reliability.”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Åström F., 2002, Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), 185
- Åström F.(2006).The Social and Intellectual Development of Library and Information Science. Umeå Sweden: Department of Sociology. Dissertation.
- 10.1002/asi.20567 · DOI
- 10.1086/651005 · DOI
- Atkins S.E., 1988, Subject trends in library and information science research, 1975–1984, Library Trends, 36, 633
- 10.1177/016555159001600104 · DOI
- 10.5860/crl_52_01_38 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.20764 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11192-007-1803-z · DOI
- Dervin B., 1986, Information needs and uses, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3
- Dogan M., 1969, Quantitative ecological analysis in the social sciences
- Feehan P.E., 1987, Library and information science research: An analysis of the 1984 journal literature, Library & Information Science Research, 9, 173
- 10.1108/eb026904 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.20720 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.10042 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.21261 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11192-012-0619-7 · DOI
- 10.1515/libr.1992.42.2.99 · DOI
- Järvelin K., 1990, Content analysis of research articles in library and information science, Library & Information Science Research, 12, 395
- 10.1016/0306-4573(93)90028-C · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lisr.2006.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1177/0165551504044668 · DOI
- Krippendorff K., 2004, Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology
- 10.1515/libr.1991.41.1.59 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.22645 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.21602 · DOI
- Nolin J., 2007, What's in a turn?, Information Research, 12
- 10.1108/00220411011016344 · DOI
- Nour M.M., 1985, A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980, Library and Information Science Research, 7, 261
- Peritz B.C., 1980, The methods of library science research: Some results from a bibliometric survey, Library Research, 2, 251
- 10.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1<62::AID-ASI1061>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
- Powell R., 1985, Basic research methods for librarians
- Rochester M.K., 2003, International library and information science research: A comparison of national trends, In IFLA Professional Reports, 82, 1
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1051::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1007/s11192-010-0275-8 · DOI
- 10.1177/0165551510369992 · DOI
- 10.1002/asi.21435 · DOI
- 10.1108/S0065-2830(1994)0000018003 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
- Wilson T.D., 2000, Recent trends in user studies: Action research and qualitative methods, Information Research, 5
- 10.1002/asi.20799 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Public libraries as an infrastructure for a sustainable public sphere
Audunson, R., Aabø, S., Blomgren, R., Evjen, S., Jochumsen, H., Larsen, H., Rasmussen, C. H., Vårheim, A., Johnston, J., & Koizumi, M. (2019) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-10-2018-0157 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuomaala, O., Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P.
- Affiliations
- School of Information Sciences University of Tampere Kanslerinrinne 1 FI‐33014 Tampere Finland
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-23
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1446-1462
- ISSN
- 2330-1635
- 2330-1643
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review