Cited by 129

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2005: Content analysis of journal articles

Tuomaala, Otto, Järvelin, Kalervo, Vakkari, Pertti·2014·Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Abstract

This article first analyzes library and information science ( LIS ) research articles published in core LIS journals in 2005. It also examines the development of LIS from 1965 to 2005 in light of comparable data sets for 1965, 1985, and 2005. In both cases, the authors report (a) how the research articles are distributed by topic and (b) what approaches, research strategies, and methods were applied in the articles. In 2005, the largest research areas in LIS by this measure were information storage and retrieval, scientific communication, library and information‐service activities, and information seeking. The same research areas constituted the quantitative core of LIS in the previous years since 1965. Information retrieval has been the most popular area of research over the years. The proportion of research on library and information‐service activities decreased after 1985, but the popularity of information seeking and of scientific communication grew during the period studied. The viewpoint of research has shifted from library and information organizations to end users and development of systems for the latter. The proportion of empirical research strategies was high and rose over time, with the survey method being the single most important method. However, attention to evaluation and experiments increased considerably after 1985. Conceptual research strategies and system analysis, description, and design were quite popular, but declining. The most significant changes from 1965 to 2005 are the decreasing interest in library and information‐service activities and the growth of research into information seeking and scientific communication.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.23034

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Åström F., 2002, Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), 185
  2. Åström F.(2006).The Social and Intellectual Development of Library and Information Science. Umeå Sweden: Department of Sociology. Dissertation.
  3. 10.1002/asi.20567 · DOI
  4. 10.1086/651005 · DOI
  5. Atkins S.E., 1988, Subject trends in library and information science research, 1975–1984, Library Trends, 36, 633
  6. 10.1177/016555159001600104 · DOI
  7. 10.5860/crl_52_01_38 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/asi.20764 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s11192-007-1803-z · DOI
  10. Dervin B., 1986, Information needs and uses, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3
  11. Dogan M., 1969, Quantitative ecological analysis in the social sciences
  12. Feehan P.E., 1987, Library and information science research: An analysis of the 1984 journal literature, Library & Information Science Research, 9, 173
  13. 10.1108/eb026904 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/asi.20720 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.007 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/asi.10042 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/asi.21261 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11192-012-0619-7 · DOI
  19. 10.1515/libr.1992.42.2.99 · DOI
  20. Järvelin K., 1990, Content analysis of research articles in library and information science, Library & Information Science Research, 12, 395
  21. 10.1016/0306-4573(93)90028-C · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.014 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.lisr.2006.03.018 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0165551504044668 · DOI
  25. Krippendorff K., 2004, Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology
  26. 10.1515/libr.1991.41.1.59 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/asi.22645 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/asi.21602 · DOI
  29. Nolin J., 2007, What's in a turn?, Information Research, 12
  30. 10.1108/00220411011016344 · DOI
  31. Nour M.M., 1985, A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980, Library and Information Science Research, 7, 261
  32. Peritz B.C., 1980, The methods of library science research: Some results from a bibliometric survey, Library Research, 2, 251
  33. 10.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1<62::AID-ASI1061>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  34. Powell R., 1985, Basic research methods for librarians
  35. Rochester M.K., 2003, International library and information science research: A comparison of national trends, In IFLA Professional Reports, 82, 1
  36. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1051::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s11192-010-0275-8 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0165551510369992 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/asi.21435 · DOI
  40. 10.1108/S0065-2830(1994)0000018003 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  42. Wilson T.D., 2000, Recent trends in user studies: Action research and qualitative methods, Information Research, 5
  43. 10.1002/asi.20799 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 129

Metadata

Authors
Tuomaala, O., Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P.
Affiliations
School of Information Sciences University of Tampere Kanslerinrinne 1 FI‐33014 Tampere Finland
Venue
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-23
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
1446-1462
ISSN
  • 2330-1635
  • 2330-1643
Cited by
129
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review