Cited by 55Public Relations and Crisis CommunicationDisaster Management and ResilienceEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies

An analysis of natural disaster‐related information‐seeking behavior using temporal stages

Rahmi, Rahmi, Joho, Hideo, Shirai, Tetsuya·2019·Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Abstract

Since natural disasters can affect many people over a vast area, studying information‐seeking behavior (ISB) during disasters is of great importance. Many previous studies have relied on online social network data, providing insights into the ISB of those with Internet access. However, in a large‐scale natural disaster such as the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011, people in the most severely affected areas tended to have limited Internet access. Therefore, an alternative data source should be explored to investigate disaster‐related ISB. This study's contributions are twofold. First, we provide a detailed description of natural disaster‐related ISB of people who experienced a large‐scale earthquake and tsunami, based on analysis of written testimonies published by local authorities. This provided insight into the relationship between information needs, channels, and sources of disaster‐related ISB. Also, our approach facilitates the study of ISB of people without Internet access both during and after a disaster. Second, we provide empirical evidence to demonstrate that the temporal stages of a disaster can characterize people's ISB during the disaster. Therefore, we propose further consideration of the temporal aspects of events for improved understanding of disaster‐related ISB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.24155

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. American Red Cross, 2011, Social media in disasters and emergencies
  2. Greenberg B.S., 2002, Diffusion, media use, and interpersonal communication behaviors, Communication and terrorism, 3
  3. Lachlan K., 2008, Age, gender and information seeking
  4. Powell J.W, 1954, An introduction to the natural history of disasters
  5. Priest S., 2006, Reading Katrina: Information sources and decision‐making in response to a natural disasters
  6. Ryan B.(2016). Developing an understanding of information seeking during the impact phase of a natural disaster (Doctoral dissertation). RMIT Research Repository Retrieved fromhttp://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:162001/Ryan.pdf.
  7. StempelIII G.H.&Hargrove T.(2002). Media sources of information and attitudes about terrorism. Communication and Terrorism: Public and Media Responses to 9/11 (pp.17–26).
  8. Stoddard E.R., 1968, Conceptual models of human behavior in disaster

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahmi, R., Joho, H., & Shirai, T.
Affiliations
University of Tsukuba (JP)
Corresponding author
Rahmi, Rahmi
Venue
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-28
Volume
70
Issue
7
Pages
715-728
ISSN
  • 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
  • 2330-1643
OpenAlex
W2907157233
Cited by
55
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • National Science and Technology Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Keywords
information seeking, natural disasters, Great East Japan Earthquake, tsunami, information sources, information channels, disaster communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review