The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Information search tactics
Abstract
As part of the study of human information search strategy, the concept of the search tactic, or move made to further a search, is introduced. Twenty‐nine tactics are named, defined, and discussed in four categories: monitoring, file structure, search formulation, and term. Implications of the search tactics for research in search strategy are considered. The search tactics are intended to be practically useful in information searching. This approach to searching is designed to be general, yet nontrivial; it is applicable to both bibliographic and reference searches and in both manual and on‐line systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVES OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL INTERACTION: ELEMENTS OF A COGNITIVE IR THEORY
INGWERSEN, P. (1996) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eb026960 · Cited by 717
Understanding user goals in web search
Rose, D. E., & Levinson, D. (2004) · Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/988672.988675 · Cited by 563
The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation
Wildemuth, B. M. (2004) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10367 · Cited by 341
Searching as learning: A systematization based on literature
Vakkari, P. (2016) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551515615833 · Cited by 189
The effects of expertise and feedback on search term selection and subsequent learning
Hembrooke, H. A., Granka, L. A., Gay, G. K., & Liddy, E. D. (2005) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20180 · Cited by 97
Metaphors in Voice User Interfaces: A Slippery Fish
Desai, S., & Twidale, M. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3609326 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Bates, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 205-214
- ISSN
- 0002-8231 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2057323446
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
