Cited by 5Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Ancient roots: A Cambrian explosion of autism susceptibility genes

Open access
Casanova, Emily L.·2023·Autism Research

Abstract

Functional gene groups often share unique evolutionary patterns. The present study addresses whether autism susceptibility genes, which frequently share functional overlap, display unusual gene age and conservation patterns compared to other gene groups. Using phylostratigraphically‐derived and other genetic data, the investigator explores average gene age, Ohnolog status, evolutionary rate, variation intolerance, and numbers of protein–protein (PPI) interactions across autism susceptibility, nervous system, developmental regulatory, immune, housekeeping, and luxury gene groups. Autism susceptibility genes are unusually old compared to controls, many genes having radiated in the Cambrian period in early vertebrates from whole genome duplication events. They are also tightly conserved across the animal kingdom, are highly variation intolerant, and have more PPI than other genes—all features suggesting extreme dosage sensitivity. The results of the current study indicate that autism susceptibility genes display unique radiation and conservation patterns, which may be a reflection of the major transitions in nervous system evolution that were occurring in early animals and which are still foundational in brain development today.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.2984

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain-related genes, including major effect genes implicated in autism, are tightly conserved and generally mutation intolerant as a result of dosage sensitivity [38].

    “However, it has previously been recognized that brain-related genes, including major effect genes implicated in autism, are tightly conserved and generally mutation intolerant as a result of dosage sensitivity [38].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casanova, E. L.
Affiliations
Department of Psychology Loyola University New Orleans Louisiana USA
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-07-08
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1480-1487
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W4383615395
Cited by
5
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
autism susceptibility genes, gene age, genetic conservation, phylostratigraphy, ohnologs, whole-genome duplication, protein-protein interaction, dosage sensitivity, nervous system evolution, Cambrian explosion, vertebrate evolution, brain development
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Animals, Autistic Disorder, Vertebrates, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review