PreprintCited by 1,662Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans

Open access
Karczewski, Konrad J., Francioli, Laurent C., Tiao, Grace, Cummings, Beryl B., Alföldi, Jessica, Wang, Qingbo, Collins, Ryan L., Laricchia, Kristen M. +58 more·2019·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · Paper page

Abstract

Summary: Genetic variants that inactivate protein-coding genes are a powerful source of information about the phenotypic consequences of gene disruption: genes critical for an organism’s function will be depleted for such variants in natural populations, while non-essential genes will tolerate their accumulation. However, predicted loss-of-function (pLoF) variants are enriched for annotation errors, and tend to be found at extremely low frequencies, so their analysis requires careful variant annotation and very large sample sizes 1 . Here, we describe the aggregation of 125,748 exomes and 15,708 genomes from human sequencing studies into the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). We identify 443,769 high-confidence pLoF variants in this cohort after filtering for sequencing and annotation artifacts. Using an improved human mutation rate model, we classify human protein-coding genes along a spectrum representing tolerance to inactivation, validate this classification using data from model organisms and engineered human cells, and show that it can be used to improve gene discovery power for both common and rare diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/531210

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing availability of reference datasets cataloguing population genetic variation across diverse ethnic backgrounds has supported robust causal inference.

    “Increasing availability of reference datasets cataloguing population genetic variation across diverse ethnic backgrounds has supported robust causal inference2,3,5,6.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [6]

  • Access to resources cataloguing genetic variation across populations has enabled confident exclusion of variants too common to be plausible causes of rare, penetrant early-onset genetic diseases.

    “Access to resources that catalogue genetic variation across populations (such as ExAC and its successor gnomAD)5,6 has enabled the confident exclusion of genetic variants too common in population-level data to be plausible causes of rare, penetrant early-onset genetic diseases24.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karczewski, K. J., Francioli, L. C., Tiao, G., Cummings, B. B., Alföldi, J., Wang, Q., Collins, R. L., Laricchia, K. M., Ganna, A., Birnbaum, D. P., Gauthier, L. D., Brand, H., Solomonson, M., Watts, N. A., Rhodes, D., Singer-Berk, M., England, E. M., Seaby, E. G., Kosmicki, J. A., Walters, R. K., Tashman, K., Farjoun, Y., Banks, E., Poterba, T., Wang, A., Seed, C., Whiffin, N., Chong, J. X., Samocha, K. E., Pierce-Hoffman, E., Zappala, Z., O’Donnell-Luria, A. H., Minikel, E. V., Weisburd, B., Lek, M., Ware, J. S., Vittal, C., Armean, I. M., Bergelson, L., Cibulskis, K., Connolly, K. M., Covarrubias, M., Donnelly, S., Ferriera, S., Gabriel, S., Gentry, J., Gupta, N., Jeandet, T., Kaplan, D., Llanwarne, C., Munshi, R., Novod, S., Petrillo, N., Roazen, D., Ruano-Rubio, V., Saltzman, A., Schleicher, M., Soto, J., Tibbetts, K., Tolonen, C., Wade, G., Talkowski, M. E., Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) Consortium, Neale, B. M., Daly, M. J., & MacArthur, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Karczewski, Konrad J.
  • MacArthur, Daniel G.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-01-28
OpenAlex
W2912491890
Cited by
1,662
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 206 · 2021: 302 · 2020: 533 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Sanofi
  • BioMarin Pharmaceutical
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (177853)
  • National Institutes of Health (HG006493)
  • Sanofi Genzyme
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HG006493)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG006493, HG008956, HG008900, UM1HG008900, UM1HG006493, U24HG008956)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM115208, R01GM104371, GM115208)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U54DK105566)
  • Common Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
loss-of-function mutations, protein-coding genes, gene essentiality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review