The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Succinic acid production derived from carbohydrates: An energy and greenhouse gas assessment of a platform chemical toward a bio‐based economy
Open accessAbstract
Bio‐based succinic acid has the potential to become a platform chemical, i.e. a key building block for deriving both commodity and high‐value chemicals, which makes it an attractive compound in a bio‐based economy. A few companies and industrial consortia have begun to develop its industrial production on a large scale. A life cycle assessment of different bio‐based succinic acid production processes, based on dextrose from corn, was performed to investigate their non‐renewable energy use ( NREU ) and greenhouse gas ( GHG ) emissions, from cradle‐to‐factory gate in Europe. Three processes were studied, i.e. (i) low pH yeast fermentation with downstream processing ( DSP ) by direct crystallization, (ii) anaerobic fermentation to succinate salt at neutral pH ( pH7 ) and subsequent DSP by electrodialysis, and (iii) a similar process producing ammonium sulfate as co‐product in DSP . These processes are compared to the production of petrochemical maleic anhydride, succinic acid, and adipic acid. Low pH yeast fermentation to succinic acid with direct crystallization was found to have significantly lower GHG emissions and NREU , compared to other fermentation routes and three petrochemical routes. However, the disparity in GHG emissions between this process and the electrodialysis process becomes less prominent if one considers a cleaner electricity mix than the current European production mix. Moreover, this study highlights that the allocation approach in corn wet milling and the succinic acid plant location strongly influence the results. Overall, the results suggest that low pH yeast fermentation with direct crystallization is the most beneficial process to bio‐based succinic acid from an environmental perspective. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bozell, J. J., & Petersen, G. R. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b922014c · Cited by 4,566
Delhomme, C., Weuster-Botz, D., & Kühn, F. E. (2009) · Green Chem. · doi:10.1039/b810684c · Cited by 343
Opportunities in the Industrial Biobased Products Industry
Carole, T. M., Pellegrino, J., & Paster, M. D. (2004) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:115:1-3:0871 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Alternative Monomers Based on Lignocellulose and Their Use for Polymer Production
Delidovich, I., Hausoul, P. J. C., Deng, L., Pfützenreuter, R., Rose, M., & Palkovits, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00354 · Cited by 773
Chemicals from biomass: technological versus environmental feasibility. A review
Fiorentino, G., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2017) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1729 · Cited by 184
Next-generation biofuels and platform biochemicals from lignocellulosic biomass
Okolie, J. A., Mukherjee, A., Nanda, S., Dalai, A. K., & Kozinski, J. A. (2021) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.6697 · Cited by 184
Adom, F., Dunn, J. B., Han, J., & Sather, N. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es503766e · Cited by 135
Techno-economic assessment of biorefinery technologies for aviation biofuels supply chains in Brazil
Alves, C. M., Valk, M., de Jong, S., Bonomi, A., van der Wielen, L. A. M., & Mussatto, S. I. (2017) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1711 · Cited by 87
Upcycling the anaerobic digestion streams in a bioeconomy approach: a review
Tsapekos, P., Khoshnevisan, B., Alvarado-Morales, M., Zhu, X., Pan, J., Tian, H., & Angelidaki, I. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111635 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Cok, B., Tsiropoulos, I., Roes, A. L., & Patel, M. K.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-29
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W1975471210
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.