The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed processing of biomass to bio‐oil for subsequent production of Fischer‐Tropsch liquids
Abstract
This study compares centralized processing to distributed processing of biomass for subsequent production of Fischer‐Tropsch liquids (FTLs) at a centralized catalytic synthesis facility. Distributed processing in this study is based on fast pyrolysis to bio‐oils, which are more economically transported to a centralized F‐T plant where bio‐oil is gasi?ed and the syngas catalytically converted to FTLs. The study indicates that a centralized gasi? cation plant can produce FTLs from biomass for $1.56 per gallon of gasoline equivalent (gge) in an optimally sized plant of 550 million gge per year. Three distributed processing systems were investigated based on the scale of biomass processing capacity: ‘on‐farm’ pyrolyzers of 5.4 ton per day (tpd) capacity; ‘small cooperative’ pyrolyzers of 55 tpd capacity, and ‘large cooperative’ pyrolyzers of 550 tpd capacity. Distributed processing is combined with very large centralized bio‐oil processing plants that accept bio‐oil for catalytic upgrading to transportation fuels, achieving costs as low as $1.43 for total fuel production capacities in excess of 2500 million gge. Total capital investment (distributed pyrolyzers and centralized bio‐oil processing plant) for this optimally sized distributed processing system is projected to be $4 billion compared to $1.6 billion for the centralized biomass processing facility. © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review
Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., & Steele, P. H. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef0502397 · Cited by 5,663
Cited by
Screening acidic zeolites for catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass and its components
Mihalcik, D. J., Mullen, C. A., & Boateng, A. A. (2011) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2011.06.001 · Cited by 513
Self-citationKargbo, H., Harris, J. S., & Phan, A. N. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110168 · Cited by 333
Sahoo, K., Bilek, E., Bergman, R., & Mani, S. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.076 · Cited by 209
Atsonios, K., Kougioumtzis, M.-A., D. Panopoulos, K., & Kakaras, E. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.056 · Cited by 198
Life cycle assessment of electricity generation using fast pyrolysis bio-oil
Fan, J., Kalnes, T. N., Alward, M., Klinger, J., Sadehvandi, A., & Shonnard, D. R. (2011) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.045 · Cited by 174
A techno-economic review of thermochemical cellulosic biofuel pathways
Brown, T. R. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.053 · Cited by 164
Sahoo, K., Upadhyay, A., Runge, T., Bergman, R., Puettmann, M., & Bilek, E. (2021) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-020-01830-9 · Cited by 144
Life cycle assessment of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems
Puettmann, M., Sahoo, K., Wilson, K., & Oneil, E. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119564 · Cited by 123
A review of biopower and mitigation potential of competing pyrolysis methods
Kung, C.-C., Fei, C. J., McCarl, B. A., & Fan, X. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112443 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, M. M., Brown, R. C., & Boateng, A. A.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-14
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-238
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2066317897
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
