Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Influence of nonspecific brain and plasma binding on CNS exposure: implications for rational drug discovery

Cory Kalvass, J., Maurer, Tristan S.·2002·Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition

Abstract

Relative plasma, brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exposures and unbound fractions in plasma and brain were examined for 18 proprietary compounds in rats. The relationship between in vivo brain‐to‐plasma ratio and in vitro plasma‐to‐brain unbound fraction (fu) was examined. In addition, plasma fu and brain fu were examined for their relationship to in vivo CSF‐to‐plasma and CSF‐to‐brain ratios, respectively. Findings were delineated based on the presence or absence of active efflux. Finally, the same comparisons were examined in FVB vs. MDR 1a/1b knockout mice for a selected P‐glycoprotein (Pgp) substrate. For the nine compounds without indications of active efflux, predictive correlations were observed between ratios of brain‐to‐plasma exposure and plasma‐to‐brain fu (r2 = 0.98), CSF‐to‐brain exposure vs. brain fu (r2 = 0.72), and CSF‐to‐plasma exposure vs. plasma fu (r2 = 0.82). For the nine compounds with indications of active efflux, nonspecific binding data tended to over predict the brain‐to‐plasma and CSF‐to‐plasma exposure ratios. Interestingly, CSF‐to‐brain exposure ratio was consistently under predicted by brain fu for this set. Using a select Pgp substrate, it was demonstrated that the brain‐to‐plasma exposure ratio was identical to that predicted by plasma‐to‐brain fu ratio in MDR 1a/1b knockout mice. In FVB mice, plasma‐to‐brain fu over predicted brain‐to‐plasma exposure ratio to the same degree as the difference in brain‐to‐plasma exposure ratio between MDR 1a/1b and FVB mice. Consistent results were obtained in rats, suggesting a similar kinetic behavior between species. These data illustrate how an understanding of relative tissue binding (plasma, brain) can allow for a quantitative examination of active processes that determine CNS exposure. The general applicability of this approach offers advantages over species‐ and mechanism‐specific approaches. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bdd.325

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Cory Kalvass, J., & Maurer, T. S.
Venue
Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-11
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
327-338
ISSN
  • 0142-2782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-081X
OpenAlex
W1990250882
Cited by
412
References
0
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of nonspecific brain and plasma binding on CNS exposure: implications for rational drug discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bdd.325
The paper
Cory Kalvass, J., & Maurer, T. S. (2002). Influence of nonspecific brain and plasma binding on CNS exposure: implications for rational drug discovery. Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdd.325

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.