The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The rise, fall and renaissance of microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes
Abstract
Microsatellites are among the most versatile of genetic markers, being used in an impressive number of biological applications. However, the evolutionary dynamics of these markers remain a source of contention. Almost 20 years after the discovery of these ubiquitous simple sequences, new genomic data are clarifying our understanding of the structure, distribution and variability of microsatellites in genomes, especially for the eukaryotes. While these new data provide a great deal of descriptive information about the nature and abundance of microsatellite sequences within eukaryotic genomes, there have been few attempts to synthesise this information to develop a global concept of evolution. This review provides an up‐to‐date account of the mutational processes, biases and constraints believed to be involved in the evolution of microsatellites, particularly with respect to the creation and degeneration of microsatellites, which we assert may be broadly viewed as a life cycle. In addition, we identify areas of contention that require further research and propose some possible directions for future investigation. BioEssays 28: 1040–1050, 2006. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
Benson, G. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.2.573 · Cited by 9,374
Mobile Elements: Drivers of Genome Evolution
Kazazian, H. H. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089670 · Cited by 1,922
Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations
Pearson, C. E., Edamura, K. N., & Cleary, J. D. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1689 · Cited by 924
Brock, G. (1999) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/8.6.1061 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Current trends in microsatellite genotyping
GUICHOUX, E., LAGACHE, L., WAGNER, S., CHAUMEIL, P., LÉGER, P., LEPAIS, O., LEPOITTEVIN, C., MALAUSA, T., REVARDEL, E., SALIN, F., et al. (2011) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.x · Cited by 937
Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful
Vieira, M. L. C., Santini, L., Diniz, A. L., & Munhoz, C. D. F. (2016) · Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0027 · Cited by 837
Division of Labor at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork
Nick McElhinny, S. A., Gordenin, D. A., Stith, C. M., Burgers, P. M. J., & Kunkel, T. A. (2008) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.022 · Cited by 502
Fast, Cost-Effective Development of Species-Specific Microsatellite Markers by Genomic Sequencing
Abdelkrim, J., Robertson, B. C., Stanton, J.-A. L., & Gemmell, N. J. (2009) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000113084 · Cited by 375
Self-citationThe landscape of human STR variation
Willems, T., Gymrek, M., Highnam, G., The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Mittelman, D., & Erlich, Y. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.177774.114 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Buschiazzo, E., & Gemmell, N. J.
- Venue
- BioEssays
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-22
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1040-1050
- ISSN
- 0265-9247 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-1878
- OpenAlex
- W1965403470
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.