Cited by 927Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerDNA Repair Mechanisms

Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations

Pearson, Christopher E., Edamura, Kerrie Nichol, Cleary, John D.·2005·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Disease-causing repeat instability is an important and unique form of mutation that is linked to more than 40 neurological, neurodegenerative and neuromuscular disorders. DNA repeat expansion mutations are dynamic and ongoing within tissues and across generations. The patterns of inherited and tissue-specific instability are determined by both gene-specific cis-elements and trans-acting DNA metabolic proteins. Repeat instability probably involves the formation of unusual DNA structures during DNA replication, repair and recombination. Experimental advances towards explaining the mechanisms of repeat instability have broadened our understanding of this mutational process. They have revealed surprising ways in which metabolic pathways can drive or protect from repeat instability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg1689

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small number of specific normal-length STRs undergo somatic or germline expansion and transition to intermediate, pre-mutation, and mutation repeat unit tract lengths.

    “By a process that is poorly understood, a small number of specific normal-length STRs undergo somatic or germline expansion and transition to intermediate, pre-mutation, and mutation (affected) repeat unit tract lengths (Mirkin, 2007; Pearson et al., 2005).”

    From Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries (2018) · cites this paper as Pearson et al., 2005

  • A large number of daSTRs known to undergo paternal instability co-localized to boundaries in mouse sperm and not in mouse oocytes.

    “Notably, a large number of daSTRs known to undergo paternal instability (McMurray, 2010; Pearson et al., 2005) co-localized to boundaries in mouse sperm and not in mouse oocytes (Du et al., 2017), suggesting that daSTRs could be at boundaries when germ line expansion takes place (Figure S3).”

    From Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries (2018) · cites this paper as Pearson et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 157 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, C. E., Edamura, K. N., & Cleary, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Pearson, Christopher E.
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2005-10
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
729-742
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2087505473
Cited by
924
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 56
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
repeat instability, dynamic mutation, trinucleotide repeat disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, cis-regulatory elements, trans-acting proteins, DNA replication, DNA repair, DNA recombination, DNA secondary structure
MeSH terms
DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Humans, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Recombination, Genetic, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion, Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System, DNA Repeat Expansion, Genomic Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review