The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Projecting the future burden of cancer: Bayesian age–period–cohort analysis with integrated nested Laplace approximations
Abstract
The projection of age‐stratified cancer incidence and mortality rates is of great interest due to demographic changes, but also therapeutical and diagnostic developments. Bayesian age–period–cohort (APC) models are well suited for the analysis of such data, but are not yet used in routine practice of epidemiologists. Reasons may include that Bayesian APC models have been criticized to produce too wide prediction intervals. Furthermore, the fitting of Bayesian APC models is usually done using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), which introduces complex convergence concerns and may be subject to additional technical problems. In this paper we address both concerns, developing efficient MCMC‐free software for routine use in epidemiological applications. We apply Bayesian APC models to annual lung cancer data for females in five different countries, previously analyzed in the literature. To assess the predictive quality, we omit the observations from the last 10 years and compare the projections with the actual observed data based on the absolute error and the continuous ranked probability score. Further, we assess calibration of the one‐step‐ahead predictive distributions. In our application, the probabilistic forecasts obtained by the Bayesian APC model are well calibrated and not too wide. A comparison to projections obtained by a generalized Lee–Carter model is also given. The methodology is implemented in the user‐friendly R‐package BAPC using integrated nested Laplace approximations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793
WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility
Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1008929526011 · Cited by 5,368
Rue, H., Martino, S., & Chopin, N. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x · Cited by 5,279
JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling
Plummer, M. (2003) · Cited by 4,720
Gelman, A. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba117a · Cited by 4,050 · cited 1×
“Alternatives include half-normal distributions for the standard deviations (Gelman, 2006) and the recently proposed penalized complexity (PC) priors (Simpson et al., 2015).”
BackgroundEstimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006
Ferlay, J., Autier, P., Boniol, M., Heanue, M., Colombet, M., & Boyle, P. (2007) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl498 · Cited by 4,036
Modeling and Forecasting U.S. Mortality
Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1992.10475265 · Cited by 2,236
Rue, H., & Held, L. (2005) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203492024 · Cited by 1,823
Self-citationAGE STANDARDIZATION OF RATES: A NEW WHO STANDARD
Ahmad, O. B., Boschi-Pinto, C., López, A. D., Murray, C. J. L., Lozano, R., & Inoue, M. (2000) · Cited by 1,794
Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness
Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,783
Cited by
Bayesian Computing with INLA: A Review
Rue, H., Riebler, A., Sørbye, S. H., Illian, J. B., Simpson, D. P., & Lindgren, F. K. (2017) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054045 · Cited by 737
Self-citationGlobal trends in incidence, death, burden and risk factors of early-onset cancer from 1990 to 2019
Zhao, J., Xu, L., Sun, J., Song, M., Wang, L., Yuan, S., Zhu, Y., Wan, Z., Larsson, S., Tsilidis, K., et al. (2023) · BMJ Oncology · doi:10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000049 · Cited by 306
Lv, H., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Dang, C., Liu, F., Zhang, X., Bai, J., You, S., Chen, H., Zhang, W., et al. (2024) · Infectious Diseases of Poverty · doi:10.1186/s40249-024-01247-8 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Riebler, A., & Held, L.
- Venue
- Biometrical Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-31
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 531-549
- ISSN
- 0323-3847 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4036
- OpenAlex
- W2585253120
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projecting the future burden of cancer: Bayesian age–period–cohort analysis with integrated nested Laplace approximations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bimj.201500263
- The paper
- Riebler, A., & Held, L. (2017). Projecting the future burden of cancer: Bayesian age–period–cohort analysis with integrated nested Laplace approximations. Biometrical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201500263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.