The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling and Forecasting U.S. Mortality
Abstract
Time series methods are used to make long-run forecasts, with confidence intervals, of age-specific mortality in the United States from 1990 to 2065. First, the logs of the age-specific death rates are modeled as a linear function of an unobserved period-specific intensity index, with parameters depending on age. This model is fit to the matrix of U.S. death rates, 1933 to 1987, using the singular value decomposition (SVD) method; it accounts for almost all the variance over time in age-specific death rates as a group. Whereas e 0 has risen at a decreasing rate over the century and has decreasing variability, k(t) declines at a roughly constant rate and has roughly constant variability, facilitating forecasting. k(t), which indexes the intensity of mortality, is next modeled as a time series (specifically, a random walk with drift) and forecast. The method performs very well on within-sample forecasts, and the forecasts are insensitive to reductions in the length of the base period from 90 to 30 years; some instability appears for base periods of 10 or 20 years, however. Forecasts of age-specific rates are derived from the forecasts of k, and other life table variables are derived and presented. These imply an increase of 10.5 years in life expectancy to 86.05 in 2065 (sexes combined), with a confidence band of plus 3.9 or minus 5.6 years, including uncertainty concerning the estimated trend. Whereas 46% now survive to age 80, by 2065 46% will survive to age 90. Of the gains forecast for person-years lived over the life cycle from now until 2065, 74% will occur at age 65 and over. These life expectancy forecasts are substantially lower than direct time series forecasts of e 0, and have far narrower confidence bands; however, they are substantially higher than the forecasts of the Social Security Administration's Office of the Actuary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In Search of Methuselah: Estimating the Upper Limits to Human Longevity
Olshansky, S. J., Carnes, B. A., & Cassel, C. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2237414 · Cited by 645
Cited by
Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030
Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D. (2006) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 · Cited by 11,386
Broken Limits to Life Expectancy
Oeppen, J., & Vaupel, J. W. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069675 · Cited by 2,819
Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century
Case, A., & Deaton, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1518393112 · Cited by 2,759
Biodemographic Trajectories of Longevity
Vaupel, J. W., Carey, J. R., Christensen, K., Johnson, T. E., Yashin, A. I., Holm, N. V., Iachine, I. A., Kannisto, V., Khazaeli, A. A., Liedo, P., et al. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5365.855 · Cited by 803
The outlook for population growth
Lee, R. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208859 · Cited by 415
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 419
- Pages
- 659-671
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1969498530
- Cited by
- 2,236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling and Forecasting U.S. Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475265
- The paper
- Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992). Modeling and Forecasting U.S. Mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10475265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.