Cited by 53Fatty Acid Research and HealthStress Responses and CortisolEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Anti-stress effects of DHA

Hamazaki, Tomohito, Itomura, Miho, Sawazaki, Shigeki, Nagao, Yoko·2000·BioFactors

Abstract

DHA is abundant in the brain. Deficiency of DHA changes behavior in animals. The purpose of the present studies was to clarify the effect of DHA intake on hostility and plasma catecholamines. In study 1, forty-one students took either DHA-rich oil capsules containing 1.5-1.8 g DHA/d (17 females and 5 males) or control oil capsules containing 97% soybean oil plus 3% fish oil (12 females and 7 males) for 3 mon in a double blind fashion. They took a psychological test (P-F Study) at the start and end of the study. Study I started at the end of summer vacation and ended in the middle of mental stress of final exams. In the control group, hostility measured by P-F Study was significantly increased at the end of the study as compared with that measured at the start (+58%), whereas it was not significantly changed in the DHA group (-14%). In a similar double blind two-mon study (study 2), we measured plasma catecholamines and cortisol of students (3 females and 4 males for the DHA group and the same numbers for the control) at the start and end of the study. In study 2 the students were under a continuous stress of final exams that lasted for two mon throughout the whole study period. The plasma cortisol did not change in either group, but the norepinephrine concentration was significantly decreased in the DHA group (-31%), whereas it stayed at the same level in the control group. These effects of DHA intake may be applied to people under psychological stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/biof.5520130108

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ω-3 fatty acids have benefits for central functioning ranging from enhanced memory, mood, attention, and cognitive performance to a reduced risk of developing depression and regulation of stress sensitivity.

    “The benefits of ω-3 (n-3) fatty acids for central functioning range from enhanced memory, mood, attention, and cognitive performance to a reduced risk of developing depression and regulation of stress sensitivity (131-138).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamazaki, T., Itomura, M., Sawazaki, S., & Nagao, Y.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Natural Medicine, University of Toyama (JP)
  • University of Toyama (JP)
  • Kogakkan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hamazaki, Tomohito
Venue
BioFactors
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-01
Volume
13
Issue
1-4
Pages
41-45
ISSN
  • 0951-6433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-8081
OpenAlex
W2128674797
Cited by
53
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioFactors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
docosahexaenoic acid, omega-3 fatty acids, psychological stress, hostility, plasma catecholamines, norepinephrine, cortisol, students, dietary supplementation, P-F study
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Double-Blind Method, Epinephrine, Female, Hostility, Humans, Male, Norepinephrine, Psychological Tests, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review