Cited by 40Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

In Situ Bone Tissue Engineering With an Endogenous Stem Cell Mobilizer and Osteoinductive Nanofibrous Polymeric Scaffolds

Lee, Jong Seung, Jin, Yoonhee, Park, Hyun‐Ji, Yang, Kisuk, Lee, Min Suk, Yang, Hee Seok, Cho, Seung‐Woo·2017·Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Classical bone tissue engineering involves the use of culture-expanded cells and scaffolds to produce tissue constructs for transplantation. Despite promising results, clinical adoption of these constructs has been limited due to various drawbacks, including extensive cell expansion steps, low cell survival rate upon transplantation, and the possibility of immuno-rejection. To bypass the ex vivo cell culture and transplantation process, the regenerative capacity of the host is exploited by mobilizing endogenous stem cells to the site of injury. Systemic injection of substance P (SP) induce mobilization of CD29 + CD105 + CD45 - cells from bone marrow and enhance bone tissue regeneration in a critical-sized calvarial bone defect model. To provide an appropriate environment for endogenous stem cells to survive and differentiate into osteogenic lineage cells, electrospun nanofibrous polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds are functionalized with hydroxyapatite (HA) particles via a polydopamine (PDA) coating to create highly osteoinductive PCL-PDA-HA scaffolds that are implanted in defects. The combination of the PCL-PDA-HA scaffold and SP treatment enhance in situ bone tissue formation in defects. Thus, this in situ bone regeneration strategy, which combines recruitment of endogenous stem cells from the bone marrow to defective sites and implantation of a highly biocompatible and osteoinductive cell-free scaffold system, has potential as an effective therapeutic in regenerative medicine…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/biot.201700062

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J. S., Jin, Y., Park, H., Yang, K., Lee, M. S., Yang, H. S., & Cho, S.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Dankook University (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, Seung‐Woo
Venue
Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-28
Volume
12
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 1860-6768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-7314
OpenAlex
W2755906871
Cited by
40
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI13C1479)
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2016R1A5A1004694)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
substance P, bone marrow-derived stem cells, hydroxyapatite particles, polydopamine coating, osteoinduction, calvarial defect, cell-free scaffolds, osteogenic differentiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone and Bones, Bone Regeneration, Cells, Cultured, Osteogenesis, Polyesters, Skull, Stem Cells, Cell Culture Techniques, Tissue Engineering, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds, Nanofibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review