The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical reconciliation of the elemental and molecular biomass composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Abstract
A systematic mathematical procedure capable of detecting the presence of a gross error in the measurements and of reconciling connected data sets by using the maximum likelihood principle is applied to the biomass composition data of yeast. The biomass composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in a chemostat under glucose limitation was analyzed for its elemental and for its molecular composition. Both descriptions initially resulted in conflicting results concerning the elemental composition, molecular weight, and degrees of reduction. The application of the statistical reconciliation method, based on elemental balances and equality relations, is used to obtain a consistent biomass composition. Simultaneously, the error margins of the data sets are significantly reduced in the reconciliation process. On the basis of statistical analysis it was found that inclusion of about 4% water in the list of biomass constituents is essential to adequately describe the dry biomass and match both set of measurements. The reconciled carbon content of the biomass varied 4% from the ones obtained from the molecular analysis. The proposed method increases the accuracy of biomass composition data of its elements and its molecules by providing a best estimate based on all available data and thus provides an improved and consistent basis for metabolic flux analysis as well as black box modeling approaches. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons Inc. Biotechnol and Bioeng 75: 334–344, 2001.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Battley, E. H. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.4.1655-1657.1995 · Cited by 23
Cited by
Amino-acid imbalance explains extension of lifespan by dietary restriction in Drosophila
Grandison, R. C., Piper, M. D. W., & Partridge, L. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08619 · Cited by 773
Calories Do Not Explain Extension of Life Span by Dietary Restriction in Drosophila
Mair, W., Piper, M. D. W., & Partridge, L. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030223 · Cited by 522
Gresham, D., Desai, M. M., Tucker, C. M., Jenq, H. T., Pai, D. A., Ward, A., DeSevo, C. G., Botstein, D., & Dunham, M. J. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000303 · Cited by 482
Zelle, R. M., de Hulster, E., van Winden, W. A., de Waard, P., Dijkema, C., Winkler, A. A., Geertman, J.-M. A., van Dijken, J. P., Pronk, J. T., & van Maris, A. J. A. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02591-07 · Cited by 379
Quantitative Evaluation of Intracellular Metabolite Extraction Techniques for Yeast Metabolomics
Canelas, A. B., ten Pierick, A., Ras, C., Seifar, R. M., van Dam, J. C., van Gulik, W. M., & Heijnen, J. J. (2009) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac900999t · Cited by 360
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lange, H. C., & Heijnen, J. J.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09-13
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 334-344
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2132617512
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.