Cited by 88Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsProtein purification and stabilityVirus-based gene therapy research

Virus susceptibility of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and detection of viral contaminations by adventitious agent testing

Open access
Berting, Andreas, Farcet, Maria R., Kreil, Thomas R.·2010·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Biopharmaceuticals are of increasing importance in the treatment of a variety of diseases. A remaining concern associated with their production is the potential introduction of adventitious agents into their manufacturing process, which may compromise the pathogen safety of a product and potentially cause stock‐out situations for important medical supplies. To ensure the safety of biological therapeutics, regulatory guidance requires adventitious agent testing (AAT) of the bulk harvest. AAT is a deliberately promiscuous assay procedure which has been developed to indicate, ideally, the presence of any viral contaminant. One of the most important cell lines used in the production of biopharmaceuticals is Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and while viral infections of CHO cells have occurred, a systematic screen of their virus susceptibility has never been published. We investigated the susceptibility of CHO cells to infection by 14 different viruses, including members of 12 families and representatives or the very species that were implicated in previously reported production cell infections. Based on our results, four different infection outcomes were distinguished, based on the possible combinations of the two factors (i) the induction, or not, of a cytopathic effect and (ii) the ability, or not, to replicate in CHO cells. Our results demonstrate that the current AAT is effective for the detection of viruses which are able to replicate in CHO cells. Due to the restricted virus susceptibility of CHO cells and the routine AAT of bulk harvests, our results provide re‐assurance for the very high safety margins of CHO cell‐derived biopharmaceuticals. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;106: 598–607. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study systematically screened Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells against 14 viruses from 12 families and found four distinct infection outcomes based on cytopathic effect (CPE) and replication. The authors conclude that routine adventitious agent testing (AAT) detects viruses able to replicate in CHO cells, supporting high safety margins for CHO-derived biopharmaceuticals.

Key findings

  • CHO cells showed four outcomes: CPE plus replication/persistence (human adenovirus [hAdV], encephalomyocarditis virus [EMCV], mice minute virus [MMV], reovirus-3 [Reo-3]); CPE with no or variable replication (Ross River virus [RRV], fowl plague virus [FPV], Cache Valley virus [CVV], vesicular stomatitis virus [VSV]); no CPE but replication (parainfluenza virus 3 [PIV-3]); and no CPE and no replication (bovine viral diarrhea virus [BVDV], coxsackievirus B3 [CVB3], murine hepatitis virus [MHV], pseudorabies virus [PRV], porcine parvovirus [PPV]).
  • hAdV was difficult to interpret: CPE was subtle, infectious virus remained stable at a mean of 3.0–3.6 log10 TCID50, and the hold control showed 4.3 log10 TCID50 after 14 days at 36 ± 2°C versus an input of 5.2 log10 TCID50, suggesting residual input virus. EMCV, MMV, and Reo-3 were reliably detected by CPE on CHO cells.
  • CVV and VSV replicated variably; CVV showed <0.9 and 5.4 log10 TCID50 in replicates, and VSV reached a mean of 4.5 log10 TCID50 at day 14. PIV-3 did not induce CPE but replicated moderately, with a hold control <0.1 log10 TCID50.
  • During AAT, supernatants from hAdV- or PIV-3-inoculated CHO cells produced clear CPE on MRC-5, Vero, and 324K cells but not CHO cells; hAdV was also detected by hemagglutination, and PIV-3 by hemadsorption and hemagglutination. The authors conclude current AAT is effective for viruses that can replicate in CHO cells.

Methods

  • CHO cells were inoculated with 14 viruses at MOI = 1 (except FPV, for which approximately 10^4 particles/well were used) for 1 h, washed, incubated for 7 ± 1 days, then supernatant was transferred to fresh CHO cells for a second 7 ± 1 days. Each setup was done in duplicate and repeated at least once.
  • Infectivity was titrated by TCID50 on virus-specific susceptible cell lines from the input inoculum, second wash, 7-day and 14-day CHO supernatants, and hold controls for selected enveloped and non-enveloped viruses incubated at 36 ± 2°C for 14 days.
  • AAT used 14-day CHO culture supernatant added to MRC-5, Vero, CHO, and 324K cells, incubated for 14 days (MRC-5, Vero, CHO) or 21 days (324K), then assessed for CPE, hemadsorption, and hemagglutination with erythrocyte suspensions.

Limitations

  • The paper states that hAdV results were difficult to interpret and that the proposed explanation for FPV’s behavior remains speculative and would require further studies.
  • The paper notes that no systematic investigation of CHO virus susceptibility had previously been published, and it did not include porcine circovirus because prior experiments showed no productive replication in CHO cells.
  • Evident from the text: the screen covers only 14 viruses from 12 families and is an in vitro study; it does not test all possible adventitious agents, and Vesivirus 2117 was not included in the panel despite being discussed as a prior contamination concern.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.22723

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The infectivity detected on the susceptible cell line after the first and second 7 ± 1 days incubation was not due to residual virus inoculum.

    “The infectivity detected on the susceptible cell line after the first and second 7 Æ 1 days incubation was not due to residual virus inoculum, as the virus was completely inactivated after 14 days at 36 Æ 28C (viral load of the hold control <0.1 log 10 [TCID 50 ]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For CVV, virus loads of <0.9 and 5.4 log10 TCID50 were detected for replicates of the same virus.

    “which resulted, for example, in the detection of virus loads of <0.9 and 5.4 log 10 [TCID 50 ] for replicates of the same virus (CVV, Fig. 2B, Supplementary Table I).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    PIV-3 presence was shown by HA with positive results using MRC-5, Vero and 324K cell culture supernatants.

    “In addition, the presence of PIV-3 was clearly shown with HAD (positive result on CHO, MRC-5 and Vero cells) and with HA (positive result by using MRC-5, Vero and 324K cell culture supernatants) assays (Table III).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    RRV, FPV, CVV, and VSV rapidly induced a CPE in CHO cells.

    “In summary, the results obtained for RRV, FPV, CVV, and VSV showed that these viruses rapidly induced a CPE in CHO cells and any contamination of the CHO cell fermenter would therefore be detected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    BVDV, CVB3, MHV, PRV and PPV did not induce a CPE in CHO cell culture.

    “Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), Murine hepatitis virus (MHV), Pseudorabies virus (PRV) and Porcine parvovirus (PPV) did not induce a CPE in CHO cell culture (Fig. 2D, Supplementary Table I).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 17
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 8
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The cytopathic effect associated with hAdV infection of CHO cells was difficult to assess, with subtle cell changes and no extensive cell layer destruction.

    “However, the CPE associated with hAdV infection of CHO cells was difficult to assess, as the observed cell changes were subtle and no extensive cell layer destruction occurred.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The presence of hAdV was clearly shown by hemagglutination, with a positive result obtained with the supernatant of MRC-5 cells.

    “In addition to the detection of hAdV through the induction of a CPE on various cell lines during AAT, the presence of hAdV was clearly shown by HA, as a positive result was obtained with the supernatant of MRC-5 cells (Table III).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    RRV, FPV, CVV, and VSV were rather thermosensitive; no infectivity was detected in the hold controls after 14 days at 36 ± 2°C.

    “These viruses were all rather thermosensitive, as no infectivity was detected in the hold controls after 14 days of incubation at 36 Æ 28C (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Table I).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    For FPV, a clear cytopathic effect was observed during the first few days of incubation, yet infectious virus was not detected on the susceptible cell line throughout the experiment.

    “For the Influenza A virus FPV a clear CPE was already observed during the first few days of incubation, yet infectious virus was not detected on the susceptible cell line throughout the course of the experiment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After the second 7 ± 1 days incubation, PRV infectivity was reduced to no detectable infectivity and PPV infectivity was reduced to 1.1 log10 [TCID50].

    “In the case of PRV and PPV, some residual infectivity was detected after the first 7 Æ 1 days incubation (mean of four replicates: 1.3 and 2.0 log 10 [TCID 50 ], respectively), which was reduced to no detectable infectivity after the second 7 Æ 1 days incubation for PRV and to 1.1 log 10 [TCID 50 ] for PPV (Fig. 2D, Supplementary Table I).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During AAT, supernatant from CHO cells inoculated and incubated with PIV-3 for 14 days induced a clear CPE on MRC-5, Vero, and 324K cells after 14 days of incubation, but not on CHO cells.

    “A clear CPE was observed on these cell lines after 14 days of incubation, with the exception of CHO cells (Table III).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For RRV, FPV, CVV, and VSV, no or variable virus replication was observed, with no or very little infectious virus after the first 7 ± 1 days and variable replication during the second 7 ± 1 days.

    “However, no or rather variable virus replication was observed, characterized by the presence of no or very little infectious virus after the first 7 Æ 1 days of CHO cell incubation and a subsequent variable replication during the second 7 Æ 1 days of incubation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    hAdV did not show clear replication in CHO cells; its infectious virus load did not increase significantly between the second wash and the supernatant after 7 and 14 days, remaining stable at a mean of 3.0-3.6 log10 TCID50.

    “Similar to the CPE results obtained for hAdV, no clear replication was observed for this virus: the load of infectious virus particles did not increase significantly between the second wash and the supernatant after 7 and 14 days of incubation but remained stable at a mean of 3.0-3.6log 10 [TCID 50 ] throughout the experiment (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Table I).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    BVDV, CVB3, MHV, PRV and PPV were not able to replicate in CHO cells.

    “The results obtained from the TCID 50 assays indicated that these viruses were not able to replicate in CHO cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During AAT with hAdV-infected CHO supernatant, clear cytopathic effect was observed on MRC-5, Vero, and 324K cells after 14 days, but not on CHO cells.

    “A clear CPE was observed on these cell lines after 14 days of incubation, with the exception of CHO cells (Table III).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TCID50 titrations of CVV showed small amounts of infectious virus once out of six determinations (1.2 log10 TCID50) after 7 ± 1 days, and twice out of six after re-inoculation and the second 7 ± 1 days (4.2 and 5.4 log10 TCID50).

    “TCID 50 titrations of CVV showed the presence of small amounts of infectious virus once (out of six determinations, 1.2 log 10 [TCID 50 ]) after 7 Æ 1 days of virus incubation on CHO cells and twice (out of six determinations) after re-inoculation and the second 7 Æ 1 days incubation (4.2 and 5.4 log 10 [TCID 50 ]; day 14; Fig. 2B, Supplementary Table I).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    hAdV is robust; its hold control load was 4.3 log10 TCID50 after 14 days at 36 ± 2°C compared to an input of 5.2 log10 TCID50.

    “The hAdV hold control showed that this virus is robust (load of 4.3 log 10 [TCID 50 ] after 14 days at 36 Æ 28C, compared to an input of 5.2 log 10 [TCID 50 ])”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    For each virus, the CHO cell inoculation and incubation setup was done in duplicate and repeated at least once.

    “For each virus, this setup was done in duplicate and repeated at least once.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The rapidly induced cytopathic effect on CHO cells indicated that RRV, FPV, CVV, and VSV were initially able to infect and destroy CHO cells, yet no or few replication-competent progeny viruses were released into the supernatant.

    “The rapidly induced CPE on CHO cells indicated that all of these viruses were initially able to infect and destroy CHO cells, yet no or few replication-competent progeny viruses were released into the supernatant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Viral contaminations of CHO cell-derived bulk harvests are rare but have occurred.

    “Viral contaminations of CHO cell-derived bulk harvests are rare, but have occurred.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Garnick, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Nims, 2006
    • cites Genzyme, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    AAT procedures involve a broad virus screen on a variety of cell lines, in which cytopathic effect, hemadsorption, and hemagglutination are assayed.

    “AAT procedures have been developed in a deliberately promiscuous fashion to indicate the presence of, ideally, any viral contaminant and involve a broad virus screen on a variety of cell lines, in which cytopathic effect (CPE), hemadsorption (HAD) and hemagglutination (HA) are assayed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Experimental infection of CHO cells with Porcine circovirus has been shown.

    “Although experimental infection of CHO cells with Porcine circovirus, a member of the Circoviridae, has been shown (Misinzo et al., 2006), this virus was not included in the present screen, as the previously published experiments showed no productive replication in CHO cells and no substantial safety concerns are therefore expected from this virus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Misinzo et al., 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A literature survey suggests that CHO cells are less permissive to infection by viruses than other cell lines used in the production of recombinant proteins, such as BHK cells.

    “In addition, a literature survey might suggest that CHO cells are less permissive to infection by viruses than other cell lines used in the production of recombinant proteins, such as baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells (Table I).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table I

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    AAT is a deliberately promiscuous assay procedure developed to indicate, ideally, the presence of any viral contaminant.

    “AAT is a deliberately promiscuous assay procedure which has been developed to indicate, ideally, the presence of any viral contaminant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CHO cells are one of the main cell lines used in the production of recombinant therapeutics.

    “Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are one of the main cell lines used in the production of recombinant therapeutics (Wurm, 2004; see Grillberger et al., 2009 for examples of proteins produced in CHO cells).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wurm, 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A specific assay for Mice minute virus is included in AAT as recommended for monoclonal antibody and vaccine production.

    “In addition, a more specific assay for Mice minute virus is included, as recommended for monoclonal antibody and vaccine production (FDA, 1997;FDA, 2006), in which, for example, CPE and HA are assayed on a susceptible cell line.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites FDA, 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites FDA, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    A remaining risk of cell culture contamination events still exists.

    “However, this recent contamination of a manufacturing facility painfully underlines that a remaining risk of such events still exists.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Genzyme, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Viral infections of CHO cells are detectable either through the induction of a clearly visible CPE or during routine AAT.

    “In conclusion, our results demonstrate that viral infections of CHO cells are detectable, either through the induction of a clearly visible CPE, or during routine AAT and we provide evidence that the current AAT system is effective for the detection of viruses that can replicate in CHO cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Vesivirus 2117 is detectable during manufacture and AAT.

    “For Vesivirus 2117, a member of the Caliciviridae and the virus that was implicated in the most recent widely visible cell culture contamination (Genzyme, 2009), a clearly visible CPE on CHO cells had previously been described (Oehmig, et al., 2003) and the virus is therefore detectable during manufacture and AAT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
24 of 24
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No systematic investigation of CHO cell virus susceptibility had been published.

    “a systematic screen of their virus susceptibility has never been published.”
    “no systematic investigation of their virus susceptibility has to date been published.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The described AAT is the routine procedure used for the assessment of recombinant protein bulk harvests from CHO cells.

    “The described AAT is the routine procedure used for the assessment of recombinant protein bulk harvests from CHO cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The panel of viruses tested is representative of viruses that could contaminate CHO cell manufacturing processes.

    “included representatives or the very species of viruses that were involved in previously reported infections”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A cytopathic effect observed in CHO cell culture would be detected in a CHO cell fermenter.

    “any contamination of the CHO cell fermenter would therefore be detected.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PIV-3 is representative of viruses that can replicate in CHO cells without an apparent CPE.

    “the effectiveness of the current AAT system to detect an example of a virus that can replicate in CHO cells without an apparent CPE was confirmed.”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Circovirus type in Table I differs from the cited reference

    Minor

    Table I lists the cited study under porcine circovirus 1, but the reference title identifies its subject as porcine circovirus 2.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Genzyme.2009.Genzyme temporarily interrupts production at Allston plant. Press release June 16 2009; available athttp://www.genzyme.com/corp/media/GENZ%20PR‐061609.asp(last accessed January 21 2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berting, A., Farcet, M. R., & Kreil, T. R.
Affiliations
Baxter (Austria) (AT)
Corresponding author
Kreil, Thomas R.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-08
Volume
106
Issue
4
Pages
598-607
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2101010021
Cited by
88
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
CHO cells, viral susceptibility, viral contamination, biopharmaceutical manufacturing, pathogen safety, cytopathic effect, viral replication, biologic therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Cricetulus, Drug Contamination, Cricetinae, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Viruses, CHO Cells, Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review