The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: A comparison of cellulose solvent‐based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia
Abstract
While many pretreatments attempt to improve the enzymatic digestibility of biomass by removing lignin, this study shows that improving the surface area accessible to cellulase is a more important factor for achieving a high sugar yield. Here we compared the pretreatment of switchgrass by two methods, cellulose solvent‐ and organic solvent‐based lignocellulose fractionation (COSLIF) and soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA). Following pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis was conducted at two cellulase loadings, 15 filter paper units (FPU)/g glucan and 3 FPU/g glucan, with and without BSA blocking of lignin absorption sites. The hydrolysis results showed that the lignin remaining after SAA had a significant negative effect on cellulase performance, despite the high level of delignification achieved with this pretreatment. No negative effect due to lignin was detected for COSLIF‐treated substrate. SEM micrographs, XRD crystallinity measurements, and cellulose accessibility to cellulase (CAC) determinations confirmed that COSLIF fully disrupted the cell wall structure, resulting in a 16‐fold increase in CAC, while SAA caused a 1.4‐fold CAC increase. A surface plot relating the lignin removal, CAC, and digestibility of numerous samples (both pure cellulosic substrates and lignocellulosic materials pretreated by several methods) was also developed to better understand the relative impacts of delignification and CAC on glucan digestibility. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108:22–30. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Segal, L., Creely, J. J., Martin, A. E., & Conrad, C. M. (1959) · Textile Research Journal · doi:10.1177/004051755902901003 · Cited by 8,613
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass
Sluiter, A. D., Hames, B. R., Ruiz, R. O., Scarlata, C. J., Sluiter, J. B., Templeton, D. W., & Crocker, D. P. (2012) · Cited by 5,261
Biomass Recalcitrance: Engineering Plants and Enzymes for Biofuels Production
Himmel, M. E., Ding, S.-Y., Johnson, D. K., Adney, W. S., Nimlos, M. R., Brady, J. W., & Foust, T. D. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137016 · Cited by 4,533
Park, S., Baker, J. O., Himmel, M. E., Parilla, P. A., & Johnson, D. K. (2010) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10 · Cited by 3,395
Perlack, R. D. (2005) · doi:10.2172/885984 · Cited by 2,085
Zhang, Y. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20282 · Cited by 1,893
Self-citationOutlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies
Percival Zhang, Y.-H., Himmel, M. E., & Mielenz, J. R. (2006) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.03.003 · Cited by 1,349
Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production
Chen, F., & Dixon, R. A. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1316 · Cited by 1,330
Fundamental Factors Affecting Biomass Enzymatic Reactivity
Chang, V. S., & Holtzapple, M. T. (2000) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:84-86:1-9:5 · Cited by 1,176
Cited by
Zhao, X., Zhang, L., & Liu, D. (2012) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1331 · Cited by 986
Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose
Ling, Z., Wang, T., Makarem, M., Santiago Cintrón, M., Cheng, H. N., Kang, X., Bacher, M., Potthast, A., Rosenau, T., King, H., et al. (2019) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-018-02230-x · Cited by 406
The lignin present in steam pretreated softwood binds enzymes and limits cellulose accessibility
Kumar, L., Arantes, V., Chandra, R., & Saddler, J. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.091 · Cited by 398
Leu, S.-Y., & Zhu, J. Y. (2013) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9276-1 · Cited by 339
Modifying crops to increase cell wall digestibility
Jung, H.-J. G., Samac, D. A., & Sarath, G. (2012) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.10.014 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Rollin, J. A., Zhu, Z., Sathitsuksanoh, N., & Zhang, Y. ‐. P.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-30
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-30
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2101393819
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 16.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: A comparison of cellulose solvent‐based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.22919
- The paper
- Rollin, J. A., Zhu, Z., Sathitsuksanoh, N., & Zhang, Y. ‐. P. (2011). Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: A comparison of cellulose solvent‐based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.