The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ionic liquid pretreatment of cellulosic biomass: Enzymatic hydrolysis and ionic liquid recycle
Abstract
Ionic liquids (ILs) are promising solvents for the pretreatment of biomass as certain ILs are able to completely solubilize lignocellulose. The cellulose can readily be precipitated with an anti‐solvent for further hydrolysis to glucose, but the anti‐solvent must be removed for the IL to be recovered and recycled. We describe the use of aqueous kosmotropic salt solutions to form a three‐phase system that precipitates the biomass, forming IL‐rich and salt‐rich phases. The phase behavior of [Emim][Ac] and aqueous phosphate salt systems is presented, together with a process for recycling the [Emim][Ac] and enzymatically hydrolyzing the cellulose. This process reduces the amount of water to be evaporated from recycled IL, permitting efficient recycle of the IL. Material balances on the process, with multiple recycles of the [Emim][Ac], quantify the major components from a Miscanthus feedstock through the pretreatment, separation, and enzymatic hydrolysis steps. A more rapid and higher yielding conversion of cellulose to glucose is obtained by use of the three‐phase system as compared to the cellulose obtained from biomass pretreated with IL and precipitated with water. The addition of a kosmotropic salt during the precipitation results in partial delignification of the biomass, which makes the substrate more accessible, enhancing the enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108:511–520. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids and its application: a mini-review
Zhu, S., Wu, Y., Chen, Q., Yu, Z., Wang, C., Jin, S., Ding, Y., & Wu, G. (2006) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b601395c · Cited by 1,260
Cellulose dissolution with polar ionic liquids under mild conditions: required factors for anions
Fukaya, Y., Hayashi, K., Wada, M., & Ohno, H. (2008) · Green Chem. · doi:10.1039/b713289a · Cited by 775
Enhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step
Dadi, A. P., Varanasi, S., & Schall, C. A. (2006) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.21047 · Cited by 574
Cited by
Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids
Brandt, A., Gräsvik, J., Hallett, J. P., & Welton, T. (2013) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2gc36364j · Cited by 1,557
Miscanthus: a fast‐growing crop for biofuels and chemicals production
Brosse, N., Dufour, A., Meng, X., Sun, Q., & Ragauskas, A. (2012) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1353 · Cited by 446
Room temperature ionic liquids as emerging solvents for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
Mora‐Pale, M., Meli, L., Doherty, T. V., Linhardt, R. J., & Dordick, J. S. (2011) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.23108 · Cited by 384
Biomass pretreatment using deep eutectic solvents from lignin derived phenols
Kim, K. H., Dutta, T., Sun, J., Simmons, B., & Singh, S. (2018) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c7gc03029k · Cited by 373
Ionic liquids for biofuel production: Opportunities and challenges
Liu, C.-Z., Wang, F., Stiles, A. R., & Guo, C. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.031 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Shill, K., Padmanabhan, S., Xin, Q., Prausnitz, J. M., Clark, D. S., & Blanch, H. W.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-22
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-520
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W4236206929
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.