Cited by 142Biofuel production and bioconversionCatalysis for Biomass ConversionIonic liquids properties and applications

Facile pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass at high loadings in room temperature ionic liquids

Wu, Hong, Mora‐Pale, Mauricio, Miao, Jianjun, Doherty, Thomas V., Linhardt, Robert J., Dordick, Jonathan S.·2011·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Ionic liquids (ILs) have emerged as attractive solvents for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment in the production of biofuels and chemical feedstocks. However, the high cost of ILs is a key deterrent to their practical application. Here, we show that acetate based ILs are effective in dramatically reducing the recalcitrance of corn stover toward enzymatic polysaccharide hydrolysis even at loadings of biomass as high as 50% by weight. Under these conditions, the IL serves more as a pretreatment additive rather than a true solvent. Pretreatment of corn stover with 1‐ethyl‐3‐methylimidizolium acetate ([Emim] [OAc]) at 125 ± 5°C for 1 h resulted in a dramatic reduction of cellulose crystallinity (up to 52%) and extraction of lignin (up to 44%). Enzymatic hydrolysis of the IL‐treated biomass was performed with a common commercial cellulase/xylanase from Trichoderma reesei and a commercial β‐glucosidase, and resulted in fermentable sugar yields of ∼80% for glucose and ∼50% for xylose at corn stover loadings up to 33% (w/w) and 55% and 34% for glucose and xylose, respectively, at 50% (w/w) biomass loading. Similar results were observed for the IL‐facilitated pretreatment of switchgrass, poplar, and the highly recalcitrant hardwood, maple. At 4.8% (w/w) corn stover, [Emim][OAc] can be readily reused up to 10 times without removal of extracted components, such as lignin, with no effect on subsequent fermentable sugar yields. A significant reduction in the amount of IL combined with facile recycling has the potential to enable ILs to be used in large‐scale biomass pretreatment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011;108: 2865–2875. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.23266

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in reactivity of β-O-4 aryl ether cleavage by hydrogen-bond acidic monoalkylimidazolium ionic liquids depended on the anion.

    “Differences in reactivity depending on the anion were observed.”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [142]

  • More strongly hydrogen bond-basic anions (Cl-, Br-, [HSO4]-) resulted in higher yields of β-O-4 cleavage products than weakly basic anions, as well as in different routes.

    “More strongly hydrogen bond-basic anions (Cl -, Br -and [HSO 4 ] -) resulted in higher yields of the cleavage products than weakly basic anions, as well as in different routes.”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [142]

  • The enol ether product was observed as an intermediate when the ionic liquid contained a coordinating anion.

    “The enol ether product in Fig. 23 (top) was observed as an intermediate when the ionic liquid contained a coordinating anion.”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [142]

  • Less coordinating anions such as [BF4]- resulted in elimination of the γ hydroxyl methylene group, forming formaldehyde.

    “Less coordinating anions such as [BF 4 ] -resulted in elimination of the γ hydroxyl methylene group, resulting in formation of formaldehyde.”

    From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [142]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, H., Mora‐Pale, M., Miao, J., Doherty, T. V., Linhardt, R. J., & Dordick, J. S.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Dordick, Jonathan S.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08
Volume
108
Issue
12
Pages
2865-2875
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2113285416
Cited by
142
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
Keywords
ionic liquids, lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment, corn stover, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate, enzymatic hydrolysis, cellulose crystallinity, lignin extraction, ionic liquid recycling, switchgrass, poplar, maple, fermentable sugars, biofuels
MeSH terms
beta-Glucosidase, Cellulase, Zea mays, Glucose, Hydrolysis, Lignin, Polysaccharides, Solvents, Temperature, Trichoderma, Xylose, Biomass, Ionic Liquids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review