Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fed‐batch and perfusion culture processes: Economic, environmental, and operational feasibility under uncertainty

Pollock, James, Ho, Sa V., Farid, Suzanne S.·2013·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

This article evaluates the current and future potential of batch and continuous cell culture technologies via a case study based on the commercial manufacture of monoclonal antibodies. The case study compares fed‐batch culture to two perfusion technologies: spin‐filter perfusion and an emerging perfusion technology utilizing alternating tangential flow (ATF) perfusion. The operational, economic, and environmental feasibility of whole bioprocesses based on these systems was evaluated using a prototype dynamic decision‐support tool built at UCL encompassing process economics, discrete‐event simulation and uncertainty analysis, and combined with a multi‐attribute decision‐making technique so as to enable a holistic assessment. The strategies were compared across a range of scales and titres so as to visualize how their ranking changes in different industry scenarios. The deterministic analysis indicated that the ATF perfusion strategy has the potential to offer cost of goods savings of 20% when compared to conventional fed‐batch manufacturing processes when a fivefold increase in maximum viable cell densities was assumed. Savings were also seen when the ATF cell density dropped to a threefold increase over the fed‐batch strategy for most combinations of titres and production scales. In contrast, the fed‐batch strategy performed better in terms of environmental sustainability with a lower water and consumable usage profile. The impact of uncertainty and failure rates on the feasibility of the strategies was explored using Monte Carlo simulation. The risk analysis results demonstrated the enhanced robustness of the fed‐batch process but also highlighted that the ATF process was still the most cost‐effective option even under uncertainty. The multi‐attribute decision‐making analysis provided insight into the limited use of spin‐filter perfusion strategies in industry. The resulting sensitivity spider plots enabled identification of the critical ratio of weightings of economic and operational benefits that affect the choice between ATF perfusion and fed‐batch strategies. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 206–219. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.24608

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Pollock, J., Ho, S. V., & Farid, S. S.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-06
Volume
110
Issue
1
Pages
206-219
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2131774841
Cited by
291
References
0
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fed‐batch and perfusion culture processes: Economic, environmental, and operational feasibility under uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.24608
The paper
Pollock, J., Ho, S. V., & Farid, S. S. (2013). Fed‐batch and perfusion culture processes: Economic, environmental, and operational feasibility under uncertainty. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.