The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activity studies of eight purified cellulases: Specificity, synergism, and binding domain effects
Open accessAbstract
The activities of six purified Thermomonospora fusca cellulases and Trichoderma reesei CBHI and CBHII were determined on filter paper, swollen cellulose, and CMC. A simple method to measure the soluble and insoluble reducing sugar products from the hydrolysis of filter paper was found to effectively distinguish between exocellulases and endocellulases. Endocellulases produced 34% to 50% insoluble reducing sugar and exocellulases produced less than 8% insoluble reducing sugar. The ability of a wide variety of mixtures of these cellulases to digest 5.2% of a filter paper disc in 16 h was measured quantitatively. The specific activities of the mixtures varied from 0.41 to 16.31 μmol cellobiose per minute per micromole enzyme. The degree of synergism ranged from 0.4 to 7.8. T. reesei CBHII and T. fusca E3 were found to be functionally equivalent in mixtures. The catalytic domains (cd) of T. fusca endocellulases E2 and E5 were purified and found to retain 93% and 100% of their CMC activity, respectively, but neither cd protein could digest filter paper to 5.2%. When E2cd and E5cd were substituted in synergistic mixtures for the native proteins, the mixtures containing E2cd retained 60%, and those containing E5cd retained 94% of the original activity. Addition of a β‐glucosidase was found to double the activity of the best synergistic mixture. Addition of CBHI to T. fusca crude cellulase increased its activity on filter paper 1.7‐fold. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Cited by
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
Zhang, Y. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20282 · Cited by 1,893
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Abdel-Rahman, M. A., Tashiro, Y., & Sonomoto, K. (2011) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.017 · Cited by 596
Zhang, Y.-H. P., Cui, J., Lynd, L. R., & Kuang, L. R. (2006) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm050799c · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- Irwin, D. C., Spezio, M., Walker, L. P., & Wilson, D. B.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1002-1013
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2025258264
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity studies of eight purified cellulases: Specificity, synergism, and binding domain effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.260420811
- The paper
- Irwin, D. C., Spezio, M., Walker, L. P., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). Activity studies of eight purified cellulases: Specificity, synergism, and binding domain effects. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260420811
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.