The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incisional hernia: A 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes
Abstract
Five hundred and sixty-four patients reviewed 1 year after major abdominal surgery have been studied prospectively by a single observer for 10 years to determine the incidence and significance of incisional hernia. Of 337 (60 per cent) patients completing the 10 year follow-up 37 (11 per cent) developed an incisional hernia and 13 (35 per cent) of these first appeared at 5 years or later. One in three hernias caused symptoms. The late appearing hernias were smaller than the early ones, and caused little trouble. Of the 18 patients who consulted their general practitioner, 11 had symptoms and of these six (55 per cent) were referred for surgical opinion. Many hernias were diagnosed at routine outpatient follow-up and were likely to receive treatment from the surgeon. Most symptomatic patients were offered surgery with the remainder usually being offered a corset. In about half our patients (mainly those without symptoms) surgery was refused or advised against although the patients would have accepted it. Recurrence is common after surgical repair (40 per cent) but seems to be related to surgical technique. The possibility of complications occurring from an incisional hernia does not appear to be discussed with patients although obstruction occurred in 14 per cent of our patients with troublesome hernia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sugerman, H. J., Kellum, J. M., Reines, H. D., DeMaria, E. J., Newsome, H. H., & Lowry, J. W. (1996) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80078-6 · Cited by 522
Takanari, K., Hong, Y., Hashizume, R., Huber, A., Amoroso, N. J., D'Amore, A., Badylak, S. F., & Wagner, W. R. (2016) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.1834 · Cited by 35
Golla, D., & Russo, C. C. (2014) · International Surgery · doi:10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00170.1 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Mudge, M., & Hughes, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-71
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2165053748
- Cited by
- 1,037
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incisional hernia: A 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800720127
- The paper
- Mudge, M., & Hughes, L. E. (1985). Incisional hernia: A 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800720127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.