The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy
Abstract
Ninety-four patients admitted to Leicester Hospitals with acute cholangitis since 1977 were reviewed to coincide with the availability of endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Thirty-four were men and sixty were women, their mean age was 69·7 years and the median hospital stay was 20 days. There were 15 deaths (16 per cent) by 30 days in patients with significantly lower initial serum albumin levels (P < 0·005) and significantly higher serum urea levels (P < 0·05) than survivors. Eighty-two patients had common bile duct (CBD) calculi of whom 71 underwent early decompression of the biliary tree either surgically (28) or by ES (43). Early surgical decompression was associated with a significantly higher 30 day mortality (6/28) than early ES (2/43) (P < 0·02) despite the fact that patients undergoing early ES were significantly older (P < 0·02) and had significantly more medical risk factors (P < 0·05). Of the 43 patients undergoing early ES 7 had had a previous cholecystectomy, 13 underwent subsequent elective cholecystectomy with no mortality and the remaining 23 had the gallbladder left in situ because of advanced age (mean age 79 years) and frailty. Only 2 of the 23 have since required cholecystectomy. We suggest that patients with acute cholangitis who do not rapidly respond to conservative treatment should undergo early ES with early surgery reserved for those who do not improve following ES. Elective cholecystectomy following successful ES can often be avoided in the elderly and frail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lammert, F., Gurusamy, K., Ko, C. W., Miquel, J.-F., Méndez-Sánchez, N., Portincasa, P., van Erpecum, K. J., van Laarhoven, C. J., & Wang, D. Q.-H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.24 · Cited by 822
Endoscopic Biliary Drainage for Severe Acute Cholangitis
Lai, E. C. S., Mok, F. P. T., Tan, E. S. Y., Lo, C.-M., Fan, S.-T., You, K.-T., & Wong, J. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199206113262401 · Cited by 587
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones
(2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.005 · Cited by 576
Metadata
- Authors
- Leese, T., Neoptolemos, J. P., Baker, A. R., & Carr-Locke, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-12-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 988-992
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2112426775
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800731214
- The paper
- Leese, T., Neoptolemos, J. P., Baker, A. R., & Carr-Locke, D. L. (1986). Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800731214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.