The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endoscopic Biliary Drainage for Severe Acute Cholangitis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for patients with severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Because recent results suggested that emergency endoscopic drainage could improve the outcome of such patients, we undertook a prospective study to determine the role of this procedure as initial treatment. METHODS: During a 43-month period, 82 patients with severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis were randomly assigned to undergo surgical decompression of the biliary tract (41 patients) or endoscopic biliary drainage (41 patients), followed by definitive treatment. Hospital mortality was analyzed with respect to the use of endoscopic biliary drainage and other clinical and laboratory findings. Prognostic determinants were studied by linear discriminant analysis. RESULTS: Complications related to biliary tract decompression and subsequent definitive treatment developed in 14 patients treated with endoscopic biliary drainage and 27 treated with surgery (34 vs. 66 percent, P greater than 0.05). The time required for normalization of temperature and stabilization of blood pressure was similar in the two groups, but more patients in the surgery group required ventilatory support. The hospital mortality rate was significantly lower for the patients who underwent endoscopy (4 deaths) than for those treated surgically (13 deaths) (10 vs. 32 percent, P less than 0.03). The presence of concomitant medical problems, a low platelet count, a high serum urea nitrogen concentration, and a low serum albumin concentration before biliary decompression were the other independent determinants of mortality in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic biliary drainage is a safe and effective measure for the initial control of severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis and to reduce the mortality associated with the condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prediction of risk in biliary surgery
Blamey, S. L., Fearon, K. C. H., Gilmour, W. H., Osborne, D. H., & Carter, D. C. (1983) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800700910 · Cited by 231
Management of acute cholangitis and the impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy
Leese, T., Neoptolemos, J. P., Baker, A. R., & Carr-Locke, D. L. (1986) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800731214 · Cited by 217
URGENT ENDOSCOPIC DRAINAGE FOR ACUTE SUPPURATIVE CHOLANGITIS
Leung, J. C., Sung, J. Y., Chung, S. S., Banez, V., & Arthur, K. C. L. (1989) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92696-2 · Cited by 216
Boey, J., & Way, L. W. (1980) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-198003000-00002 · Cited by 214
GIGOT, J. F., LEESE, T., Dereme, T., COUTINHO, J., Castaing, D., & Bismuth, H. (1989) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-198904000-00008 · Cited by 153
Emergency Surgery for Severe Acute Cholangitis
Lai, E. C. S., TAM, P.-C., PATERSON, I. A., Ng, M. M.-T., FAN, S.-T., CHOI, T.-K., & Wong, J. (1990) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199001000-00009 · Cited by 129
Self-citationThe urgency of diagnosis and surgical treatment of acute suppurative cholangitis
Welch, J. P., & DONALDSON, G. A. (1976) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/0002-9610(76)90003-9 · Cited by 107
O'Connor, M. J. (1982) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380280031007 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Lammert, F., Gurusamy, K., Ko, C. W., Miquel, J.-F., Méndez-Sánchez, N., Portincasa, P., van Erpecum, K. J., van Laarhoven, C. J., & Wang, D. Q.-H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.24 · Cited by 822
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones
(2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.005 · Cited by 576
Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery
Stewart, B., Khanduri, P., McCord, C., Ohene-Yeboah, M., Uranues, S., Vega Rivera, F., & Mock, C. (2014) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9329 · Cited by 550
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones
Dasari, B. V., Tan, C. J., Gurusamy, K. S., Martin, D. J., Kirk, G., McKie, L., Diamond, T., & Taylor, M. A. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003327.pub4 · Cited by 522
WSES/GAIS/SIS-E/WSIS/AAST global clinical pathways for patients with intra-abdominal infections
Sartelli, M., Coccolini, F., Kluger, Y., Agastra, E., Abu-Zidan, F. M., Abbas, A. E. S., Ansaloni, L., Adesunkanmi, A. K., Atanasov, B., Augustin, G., et al. (2021) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-021-00387-8 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, E. C. S., Mok, F. P. T., Tan, E. S. Y., Lo, C.-M., Fan, S.-T., You, K.-T., & Wong, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-06-11
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1582-1586
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2316955320
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Biliary Drainage for Severe Acute Cholangitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199206113262401
- The paper
- Lai, E. C. S., Mok, F. P. T., Tan, E. S. Y., Lo, C.-M., Fan, S.-T., You, K.-T., & Wong, J. (1992). Endoscopic Biliary Drainage for Severe Acute Cholangitis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199206113262401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.