The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relevant Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer: Ten-Year Results of the German Gastric Cancer Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: In 1986 a prospective multicenter observation trial in patients with resected gastric cancer was initiated in Germany. An analysis of prognostic factors based on the 10-year survival data is now presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1654 patients treated for gastric cancer between 1986 and 1989 at 19 centers in Germany and Austria were included. The resected specimen were evaluated histopathologically according to a standardized protocol. The extent of lymphadenectomy was classified after surgery based on the number of removed lymph nodes on histopathologic assessment (25 or fewer removed nodes, D1 or standard lymphadenectomy; >25 removed nodes, D2 or extended lymphadenectomy). Endpoint of the study was death. Follow-up is complete for 97% of the included patients (median follow-up of the surviving patients is 8.4 years). Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A complete macroscopic and microscopic tumor resection (R0 resection according to the UICC 1997) could be achieved in 1182 of the 1654 patients (71.5%). The calculated 10-year survival rate in the entire patient population was 26.3% +/- 4.7%; it was 36.1% +/- 1.6% after an R0 resection. In the total patient population there was an independent prognostic effect of the ratio between invaded and removed lymph nodes, the residual tumor (R) category, the pT category, the presence of postsurgical complications, and the presence of distant metastases. Multivariate analysis in the subgroup of patients who had a UICC R0 resection confirmed the nodal status, the pT category, and the presence of postsurgical complications as the major independent prognostic factors. The extent of lymph node dissection had a significant and independent effect on the 10-year survival rate in patients with stage II tumors. This effect was present in the subgroups with (pT2N1) and without (pT3N0) lymph node metastases on standard histopathologic assessment. The beneficial effect of extended lymph node dissection for stage II tumors persisted when patients with insufficient lymph node dissection (<15 nodes) were excluded from the analysis. There was no difference in the postsurgical morbidity and mortality rates between patients with standard and extended lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node ratio and lymph node status are the most important prognostic factors in patients with resected gastric cancer. In experienced centers, extended lymph node dissection does not increase the mortality or morbidity rate of resection for gastric cancer but markedly improves long-term survival in patients with stage II tumors. This effect appears to be independent of the phenomenon of stage migration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
LAURÉN, P. (1965) · Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31 · Cited by 6,133
Feinstein, A. R., Sosin, D. M., & Wells, C. K. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198506203122504 · Cited by 1,544
The Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer, & Kajitani, T. (1981) · The Japanese Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf02468883 · Cited by 1,201
Bonenkamp, J. J., Songun, I., Welvaart, K., van de Velde, C. J. H., Hermans, J., Sasako, M., Plukker, J. T. M., van Elk, P., Obertop, H., Gouma, D. J., et al. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90637-1 · Cited by 1,026
Cuschieri, A., Joypaul, V., Fayers, P. M., Cook, P., Fielding, J. W. L., Craven, J. L., & Bancewicz, J. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90144-0 · Cited by 1,006
A Confidence Interval for the Median Survival Time
Brookmeyer, R., & Crowley, J. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530286 · Cited by 914
Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma
German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group, Siewert, J. R., Böttcher, K., Roder, J. D., Busch, R., Hermanek, P., & Meyer, H. J. (1993) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800800829 · Cited by 452
Self-citationPrognostic factors in gastric carcinoma. Results of the German gastric carcinoma study 1992
Roder, J. D., Böttcher, K., Siewert, J. R., Busch, R., Hermanek, P., Meyer, H.-J., & The German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group (1993) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19931001)72:7<2089::aid-cncr2820720706>3.0.co;2-h · Cited by 335
Self-citation
Cited by
Leissner, J., Hohenfellner, R., Thüroff, J. W., & Wolf, H. K. (2000) · BJU International · doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00614.x · Cited by 444
(2011) · PubMed · Cited by 100
Guo, J., Chen, S., Chen, Y., Li, S., & Xu, D. (2018) · Cancer Management and Research · doi:10.2147/cmar.s156071 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Siewert, J. R., Böttcher, K., Stein, H. J., & Roder, J. D.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 228
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-461
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046279698
- Cited by
- 1,083
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 21.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relevant Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer: Ten-Year Results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-199810000-00002
- The paper
- Siewert, J. R., Böttcher, K., Stein, H. J., & Roder, J. D. (1998). Relevant Prognostic Factors in Gastric Cancer: Ten-Year Results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199810000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.