The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment and survival in 13560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: An epidemiological study
Abstract
The trends in treatment and outcome of 13560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and in incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands health region were determined between 1957 and 1986 using data from the West Midlands Region Cancer Registry. Patients were divided into those diagnosed in the first 20 years (19570–1976, n = 7888) and the most recent 10 years (1977–1986, n = 5672). The disease was more common in men and the incidence increased up to 1970 after which it levelled off. In the 1977–1986 period a lower proportion of patients had laparotomy alone (825 (14·5 per cent) versus 1552 (19·7 per cent)), a similar proportion had bypass surgery (2010 (35·4 per cent) versus 2760 (35·0 per cent)), while a greater proportion had supportive care (2710 (47·8 per cent) versus 3368 (42·7 per cent)) but the resection rates were the same (145 (2·6 per cent) versus 208 (2·6 per cent)). The 30-day mortality rates between the two periods unproved for resection (40 (27·6 per cent) versus 94 (45·2 per cent)), bypass surgery (436 (21·7 percent) versus 691 (25·0 per cent)) and laparotomy (372 (45·1 per cent) versus 873 (56·3 per cent)). The 12-month survival rate for bypass did not significantly differ during the study (14·9 per cent versus 12·4 per cent) but there was a significant improvement in the 5-year survival for resection (9·7 per cent versus 2·6 per cent, P < 0·015). The resection rates were low and 30-day mortality rates for surgery were high compared with those of other published series.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Randomized Trial of Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer
Neoptolemos, J. P., Stocken, D. D., Friess, H., Bassi, C., Dunn, J. A., Hickey, H., Beger, H., Fernandez-Cruz, L., Dervenis, C., Lacaine, F., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032295 · Cited by 2,716
Self-citationKleeff, J., Korc, M., Apte, M., La Vecchia, C., Johnson, C. D., Biankin, A. V., Neale, R. E., Tempero, M., Tuveson, D. A., Hruban, R. H., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.22 · Cited by 1,982
Self-citationNeoptolemos, J., Dunn, J., Stocken, D., Almond, J., Link, K., Beger, H., Bassi, C., Falconi, M., Pederzoli, P., Dervenis, C., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06651-x · Cited by 1,111
Self-citationOncologic Photodynamic Therapy: Basic Principles, Current Clinical Status and Future Directions
Van Straten, D., Mashayekhi, V., De Bruijn, H., Oliveira, S., & Robinson, D. (2017) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers9020019 · Cited by 1,012
Conlon, K. C., Klimstra, D. S., & Brennan, M. F. (1996) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199603000-00007 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Bramhall, S. R., Allum, W. H., Jones, A. G., Allwood, A., Cummins, C., & Neoptolemos, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-115
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2027451548
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment and survival in 13560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: An epidemiological study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.1800820137
- The paper
- Bramhall, S. R., Allum, W. H., Jones, A. G., Allwood, A., Cummins, C., & Neoptolemos, J. P. (1995). Treatment and survival in 13560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: An epidemiological study. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.