Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,012

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 317 of the 317 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy: Basic Principles, Current Clinical Status and Future Directions

Open access
Van Straten, Demian, Mashayekhi, Vida, De Bruijn, Henriette, Oliveira, Sabrina, Robinson, Dominic·2017·Cancers

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved cancer therapy, based on a photochemical reaction between a light activatable molecule or photosensitizer, light, and molecular oxygen. When these three harmless components are present together, reactive oxygen species are formed. These can directly damage cells and/or vasculature, and induce inflammatory and immune responses. PDT is a two-stage procedure, which starts with photosensitizer administration followed by a locally directed light exposure, with the aim of confined tumor destruction. Since its regulatory approval, over 30 years ago, PDT has been the subject of numerous studies and has proven to be an effective form of cancer therapy. This review provides an overview of the clinical trials conducted over the last 10 years, illustrating how PDT is applied in the clinic today. Furthermore, examples from ongoing clinical trials and the most recent preclinical studies are presented, to show the directions, in which PDT is headed, in the near and distant future. Despite the clinical success reported, PDT is still currently underutilized in the clinic. We also discuss the factors that hamper the exploration of this effective therapy and what should be changed to render it a more effective and more widely available option for patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers9020019

Cites

317 of 317 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 317 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Raab, 1900, Uber die wirkung fluoreszierender stoffe auf infusorien, Zeitung Biol., 39, 524
  2. 1913, Untersuchungen uber die biologische photodynamische wirkung des hematoporphyrins und anderer derivative des blut und galenafarbstoffs, Dtsch. Arch. Klin., 112, 476
  3. Lipson, 1961, The use of a derivative of hematoporhyrin in tumor detection, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 26, 1
  4. Luo, 1997, Initiation of apoptosis versus necrosis by photodynamic therapy with chloroaluminum phthalocyanine, Photochem. Photobiol., 66, 479, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb03176.x · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb03176.x
  5. Nagata, 2003, Necrotic and apoptotic cell death of human malignant melanoma cells following photodynamic therapy using an amphiphilic photosensitizer, ATX-S10(Na), Lasers Surg. Med., 33, 64, 10.1002/lsm.10190 · doi:10.1002/lsm.10190
  6. Heldman, 1988, Release of clotting factors from photosensitized endothelial cells: A possible trigger for blood vessel occlusion by photodynamic therapy, FEBS Lett., 236, 105, 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80294-1 · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(88)80294-1
  7. Foster, 1991, Photosensitized release of von willebrand factor from cultured human endothelial cells, Cancer Res., 51, 3261
  8. Kurohane, 2001, Photodynamic therapy targeted to tumor-induced angiogenic vessels, Cancer Lett., 167, 49, 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00475-X · doi:10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00475-x
  9. Mordon, 2015, Light emitting fabric technologies for photodynamic therapy, Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther., 12, 1, 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.11.002 · doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.11.002
  10. Forbes, 1984, Oxygen dependency of photocytotoxicity with haematoporphyrin derivative, Photochem. Photobiol., 39, 631, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1984.tb03902.x · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1984.tb03902.x
  11. Price, 2013, Effects of the oxygenation level on formation of different reactive oxygen species during photodynamic therapy, Photochem. Photobiol., 89, 683, 10.1111/php.12027 · doi:10.1111/php.12027
  12. Akilov, 2006, The role of photosensitizer molecular charge and structure on the efficacy of photodynamic therapy against leishmania parasites, Chem. Biol., 13, 839, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.06.008 · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.06.008
  13. Dummin, 1997, Selective photosensitization of mitochondria in HeLa cells by cationic Zn (II) phthalocyanines with lipophilic side-chains, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 37, 219, 10.1016/S1011-1344(96)07416-7 · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(96)07416-7
  14. Pavani, 2009, Effect of zinc insertion and hydrophobicity on the membrane interactions and PDT activity of porphyrin photosensitizers, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 8, 233, 10.1039/b810313e · doi:10.1039/b810313e
  15. Chen, K.C., Hsieh, Y.S., Tseng, Y.F., Shieh, M.J., Chen, J.S., Lai, H.S., and Lee, J.M. (2015). Pleural photodynamic therapy and surgery in lung cancer and thymoma patients with pleural spread. PLoS ONE, 10. · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133230
  16. Kato, 2006, Basic and clinical research on photodynamic therapy at Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Lasers Surg. Med., 38, 371, 10.1002/lsm.20346 · doi:10.1002/lsm.20346
  17. Keeley, 2007, Photodynamic therapy with curative intent for barrett’s esophagus with high grade dysplasia and superficial esophageal cancer, Ann. Surg. Oncol., 14, 2406, 10.1245/s10434-007-9392-x · doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9392-x
  18. Yachimski, 2009, Patient predictors of histopathologic response after photodynamic therapy of barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma, Gastrointest. Endosc., 69, 205, 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.032 · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.032
  19. Gill, 2009, Pilot study on light dosimetry variables for photodynamic therapy of barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia, Clin. Cancer Res., 15, 1830, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2317 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-2317
  20. Prasad, 2008, Utility of biomarkers in prediction of response to ablative therapy in barrett’s esophagus, Gastroenterology, 135, 370, 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.036 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.036
  21. Prasad, 2008, Correlation of histology with biomarker status after photodynamic therapy in barrett esophagus, Cancer, 113, 470, 10.1002/cncr.23573 · doi:10.1002/cncr.23573
  22. Yoon, 2012, Role of photodynamic therapy in the palliation of obstructing esophageal cancer, Korean J. Intern. Med., 27, 278, 10.3904/kjim.2012.27.3.278 · doi:10.3904/kjim.2012.27.3.278
  23. Yano, 2005, Photodynamic therapy as salvage treatment for local failures after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer, Gastrointest. Endosc., 62, 31, 10.1016/S0016-5107(05)00545-6 · doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00545-6
  24. Yano, 2008, Long-term results of salvage endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with local failure after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Endoscopy, 40, 717, 10.1055/s-2008-1077480 · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1077480
  25. Prasad, 2007, Long-term survival following endoscopic and surgical treatment of high-grade dysplasia in barrett’s esophagus, Gastroenterology, 132, 1226, 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.017 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.017
  26. Gray, 2013, Long term efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an ablative therapy of high grade dysplasia in barrett’s oesophagus, Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther., 10, 561, 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2013.06.002 · doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2013.06.002
  27. David, 2015, Comparison of endoscopic treatment modalities for barrett’s neoplasia, Gastrointest. Endosc., 82, 793, 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1979 · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1979
  28. Feyh, 1996, Photodynamic treatment for cancers of the head and neck, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 36, 175, 10.1016/S1011-1344(96)07366-6 · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(96)07366-6
  29. Dilkes, 1995, Treatment of head and neck cancer with photodynamic therapy: Results after one year, J. Laryngol. Otol., 109, 1072, 10.1017/S0022215100132050 · doi:10.1017/s0022215100132050
  30. Copper, 2003, Meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin photodynamic therapy in early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 129, 709, 10.1001/archotol.129.7.709 · doi:10.1001/archotol.129.7.709
  31. Jerjes, 2011, Photodynamic therapy outcome for T1/T2 N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma, Lasers Surg. Med., 43, 463, 10.1002/lsm.21071 · doi:10.1002/lsm.21071
  32. Shikowitz, 2005, Clinical trial of photodynamic therapy with meso-tetra (hydroxyphenyl) chlorin for respiratory papillomatosis, Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 131, 99, 10.1001/archotol.131.2.99 · doi:10.1001/archotol.131.2.99
  33. Fan, 1997, Photodynamic therapy using mTHPC for malignant disease in the oral cavity, Int. J. Cancer, 73, 25, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970926)73:1<25::AID-IJC5>3.0.CO;2-3 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970926)73:1<25::aid-ijc5>3.0.co;2-3
  34. Karakullukcu, 2013, A matched cohort comparison of mthpc-mediated photodynamic therapy and trans-oral surgery of early stage oral cavity squamous cell cancer, Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 270, 1093, 10.1007/s00405-012-2104-6 · doi:10.1007/s00405-012-2104-6
  35. Stoker, 2015, Photodynamic therapy as salvage therapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma experiencing local failures following definitive radiotherapy, Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther., 12, 519, 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.04.005 · doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.04.005
  36. Jerjes, 2009, Ultrasound-guided photodynamic therapy for deep seated pathologies: Prospective study, Lasers Surg. Med., 41, 612, 10.1002/lsm.20853 · doi:10.1002/lsm.20853
  37. Vander Poorten, V., Meulemans, J., Nuyts, S., Clement, P., Hermans, R., Hauben, E., and Delaere, P. (2015). Postoperative photodynamic therapy as a new adjuvant treatment after robot-assisted salvage surgery of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue. World J. Surg. Oncol. · doi:10.1186/s12957-015-0630-6
  38. Caesar, L., Lorenz, K.J., Tan, B., Karakullukcu, B., Aans, J.B., and Dilici, A. (June, January 28). Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of recurrent sino-nasal skull base tumors. Proceedings of the 85th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Dortmund, Germany.
  39. Nanashima, 2012, Photodynamic therapy using talaporfin sodium (laserphyrin(r)) for bile duct carcinoma: A preliminary clinical trial, AntiCancer Res., 32, 4931
  40. Berr, 2000, Neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy before curative resection of proximal bile duct carcinoma, J. Hepatol., 32, 352, 10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80083-5 · doi:10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80083-5
  41. Wagner, 2013, Photodynamic therapy for hilar bile duct cancer: Clinical evidence for improved tumoricidal tissue penetration by temoporfin, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci, 12, 1065, 10.1039/c3pp25425a · doi:10.1039/c3pp25425a
  42. Wentrup, 2016, Photodynamic therapy plus chemotherapy compared with photodynamic therapy alone in hilar nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma, Gut Liver, 10, 470, 10.5009/gnl15175 · doi:10.5009/gnl15175
  43. Lee, 2013, Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for recurrent, high grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer refractory or intolerant to bacille calmette-guerin immunotherapy, J. Urol., 190, 1192, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.077 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.077
  44. Choi, 2015, Photodynamic therapy for premalignant lesions of the vulva and vagina: A long-term follow-up study, Lasers Surg. Med., 47, 566, 10.1002/lsm.22384 · doi:10.1002/lsm.22384
  45. Hillemanns, 2008, Pharmacokinetics and selectivity of porphyrin synthesis after topical application of hexaminolevulinate in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 198, 300. e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.045 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.045
  46. Hillemanns, 2014, Efficacy and safety of hexaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy in patients with low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Lasers Surg. Med., 46, 456, 10.1002/lsm.22255 · doi:10.1002/lsm.22255
  47. Soergel, 2010, Effects of photodynamic therapy using topical applied hexylaminolevulinate and methylaminolevulinate upon the integrity of cervical epithelium, Lasers Surg. Med., 42, 624, 10.1002/lsm.20979 · doi:10.1002/lsm.20979
  48. Azzouzi, 2013, Tookad® soluble vascular-targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy: Determination of optimal treatment conditions and assessment of effects in patients with localised prostate cancer, BJU Int., 112, 766, 10.1111/bju.12265 · doi:10.1111/bju.12265
  49. Nakamura, 2014, Usefulness of photodynamic diagnosis and therapy using talaporfin sodium for an advanced-aged patient with inoperable gastric cancer (a secondary publication), Laser Ther., 23, 201, 10.5978/islsm.14-OR-16 · doi:10.5978/islsm.14-or-16
  50. Welbourn, 2014, Can photodynamic therapy be the preferred treatment option for anal intraepithelial neoplasia? Initial results of a pilot study, Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther., 11, 20, 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2013.11.004 · doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2013.11.004
  51. Boixadera, 2009, Prospective clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for symptomatic circumscribed choroidal hemangioma, Ophthalmology, 116, 100, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.029 · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.029
  52. Kaliki, 2012, Photodynamic therapy for choroidal metastasis in 8 cases, Ophthalmology, 119, 1218, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.024 · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.024
  53. Blasi, 2010, Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for symptomatic circumscribed choroidal hemangioma: Five-year outcomes, Ophthalmology, 117, 1630, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.033 · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.033
  54. Kascakova, S., Hofland, L.J., De Bruijn, H.S., Ye, Y., Achilefu, S., van der Wansem, K., van der Ploeg-van den Heuvel, A., van Koetsveld, P.M., Brugts, M.P., and van der Lelij, A.J. (2014). Somatostatin analogues for receptor targeted photodynamic therapy. PLoS ONE, 9. · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104448
  55. Gravier, 2008, Improvement of meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin-like photosensitizer selectivity with folate-based targeted delivery. Synthesis and in vivo delivery studies, J. Med. Chem., 51, 3867, 10.1021/jm800125a · doi:10.1021/jm800125a
  56. Kameyama, 2011, Photodynamic therapy using an anti-egf receptor antibody complexed with verteporfin nanoparticles: A proof of concept study, Cancer Biother. Radiopharm., 26, 697
  57. Duska, 1997, Biodistribution of charged F(ab’)2 photoimmunoconjugates in a xenograft model of ovarian cancer, Br. J. Cancer, 75, 837, 10.1038/bjc.1997.149 · doi:10.1038/bjc.1997.149
  58. Kuimova, 2007, Fluorescence characterisation of multiply-loaded anti-HER2 single chain fv-photosensitizer conjugates suitable for photodynamic therapy, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci, 6, 933, 10.1039/b708320c · doi:10.1039/b708320c
  59. Bhatti, 2008, Targeted photodynamic therapy with multiply-loaded recombinant antibody fragments, Int. J. Cancer, 122, 1155, 10.1002/ijc.23206 · doi:10.1002/ijc.23206
  60. Milgrom, 2008, Towards recombinant antibody-fragment targeted photodynamic therapy, Sci. Prog., 91, 241, 10.3184/003685008X361415 · doi:10.3184/003685008x361415
  61. Vogl, 2004, Interstitial photodynamic laser therapy in interventional oncology, Eur. Radiol., 14, 1063, 10.1007/s00330-004-2290-8 · doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2290-8
  62. Jerjes, 2011, Photodynamic therapy: The minimally invasive surgical intervention for advanced and/or recurrent tongue base carcinoma, Lasers Surg. Med., 43, 283, 10.1002/lsm.21048 · doi:10.1002/lsm.21048
  63. Sajisevi, 2015, Image-guided interstitial photodynamic therapy for squamous cell carcinomas: Preclinical investigation, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Med. Pathol., 27, 159, 10.1016/j.ajoms.2013.12.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ajoms.2013.12.003
  64. Chang, C., Wang, K.K., and Zhu, T.C. (2010). A fast heterogeneous algorithm for light fluence rate for prostate photodynamic therapy. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · doi:10.1117/12.843000
  65. Liang, X., Wang, K.K., and Zhu, T.C. (2012). Characterization of tissue optical properties for prostate PDT using interstitial diffuse optical tomography. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · doi:10.1117/12.908294
  66. Sharikova, A.V., Finlay, J.C., Dimofte, A., and Zhu, T.C. (2013). A robotic multi-channel platform for interstitial photodynamic therapy. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · doi:10.1117/12.2004955
  67. Pogue, B.W., Sheng, C., Benevides, J., Forcione, D., Puricelli, B., Nishioka, N., and Hasan, T. (2008). Protoporphyrin ix fluorescence photobleaching increases with the use of fractionated irradiation in the esophagus. J. Biomed. Opt. · doi:10.1117/1.2937476
  68. Woodburn, 1994, Biodistribution and PDT efficacy of a ketochlorin photosensitizer as a function of the delivery vehicle, Photochem. Photobiol., 60, 154, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1994.tb05083.x · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1994.tb05083.x
  69. Kruijt, 2006, Laser speckle imaging of dynamic changes in flow during photodynamic therapy, Lasers Med. Sci., 21, 208, 10.1007/s10103-006-0399-5 · doi:10.1007/s10103-006-0399-5
  70. Quon, 2015, Measuring the physiologic properties of oral lesions receiving fractionated photodynamic therapy, Photochem. Photobiol., 91, 1210, 10.1111/php.12475 · doi:10.1111/php.12475
  71. Gupta, 2014, Polyacrylamide-based biocompatible nanoplatform enhances the tumor uptake, PET/fluorescence imaging and anticancer activity of a chlorophyll analog, Theranostics, 4, 614, 10.7150/thno.8478 · doi:10.7150/thno.8478
  72. Marrache, 2013, Immune stimulating photoactive hybrid nanoparticles for metastatic breast cancer, Integr. Biol., 5, 215, 10.1039/c2ib20125a · doi:10.1039/c2ib20125a
  73. Moghissi, K. (2007). PDT: The plight. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. · doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2007.10.003

Cited by

See all 1,012

Metadata

Authors
Van Straten, D., Mashayekhi, V., De Bruijn, H., Oliveira, S., & Robinson, D.
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-02-18
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
19
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590947287
Cited by
1,012
References
317
FWCI
72.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
European Research Council (677582)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy: Basic Principles, Current Clinical Status and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/cancers9020019
The paper
Van Straten, D., Mashayekhi, V., De Bruijn, H., Oliveira, S., & Robinson, D. (2017). Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy: Basic Principles, Current Clinical Status and Future Directions. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9020019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.