The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol
Open accessAbstract
Background: The effects of immediate postoperative enteral nutrition on postoperative nitrogen balance and insulin resistance were studied in patients subjected to an enhanced-recovery protocol. Methods: Eighteen patients undergoing major colorectal surgery in an enhanced-recovery protocol were randomized to immediate postoperative enteral feeding for 4 days with either complete or hypocaloric nutrition. Nitrogen balance and changes in glucose kinetics, substrate utilization (indirect calorimetry) and insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinaemic–euglycaemic clamp) were measured. Values are mean(s.e.m.). Results: Mean postoperative urinary nitrogen losses were low (10·7(1·0) versus 10·5(0·7) g per day for complete versus hypocaloric nutrition) and insulin resistance was insignificant (−20(7) versus − 27(11) per cent), with no difference between groups. Complete enteral feeding was given without hyperglycaemia (blood glucose concentration 5·8(0·4) versus 5·0(0·4) mmol/l) and resulted in nitrogen balance (+0·1(0·8) versus − 12·6(0·6) g nitrogen per day; P < 0·001). Conclusion: This enhanced-recovery protocol was associated with minimal postoperative insulin resistance and nitrogen losses after surgery. Immediate postoperative enteral nutrition was provided without hyperglycaemia and resulted in nitrogen balance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liu, D., Moberg, E., Kollind, M., Lins, P. E., Adamson, U., & Macdonald, I. A. (1992) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00400932 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Gustafsson, U. O., Scott, M. J., Hubner, M., Nygren, J., Demartines, N., Francis, N., Rockall, T. A., Young‐Fadok, T. M., Hill, A. G., Soop, M., et al. (2019) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y · Cited by 2,119
Self-citationAdamina, M., Kehlet, H., Tomlinson, G. A., Senagore, A. J., & Delaney, C. P. (2011) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003 · Cited by 555
Behrns, K. E. (2012) · Yearbook of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ysur.2011.11.001 · Cited by 426
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: Time to change practice?
Melnyk, M., Casey, R. G., Black, P., & Koupparis, A. J. (2011) · Canadian Urological Association Journal · doi:10.5489/cuaj.11002 · Cited by 384
Promoting perioperative metabolic and nutritional care
Gillis, C., & Carli, F. (2015) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000795 · Cited by 350
Metadata
- Authors
- Soop, M., Carlson, G. L., Hopkinson, J., Clarke, S., Thorell, A., Nygren, J., & Ljungqvist, O.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-08-09
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1138-1145
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2019244812
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.4642
- The paper
- Soop, M., Carlson, G. L., Hopkinson, J., Clarke, S., Thorell, A., Nygren, J., & Ljungqvist, O. (2004). Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
