The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse
Open accessAbstract
Background: Postoperative constipation is a common problem with most mesh suspension techniques used to correct rectal prolapse. Autonomic denervation of the rectum subsequent to its complete mobilization has been suggested as a contributory factor. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of patients who underwent a novel, autonomic nerve-sparing, laparoscopic technique for rectal prolapse. Methods: Between 1995 and 1999, 42 patients had laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. The long-term results after a median follow-up of 61 (range 29–98) months were analysed. Results: There were no major postoperative complications. Late recurrence occurred in two patients. In 28 of 31 patients with incontinence there was a significant improvement in continence. Symptoms of obstructed defaecation resolved in 16 of 19 patients. During follow-up, new onset of mild obstructed defaecation was noted in only two patients. Symptoms suggestive of slow-transit colonic obstipation were not induced. Conclusion: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is an effective technique for the correction of rectal prolapse and appears to avoid severe postoperative constipation. The ventral position of the prosthesis may explain the beneficial effect on symptoms of obstructed defaecation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Etiology and management of fecal incontinence
Jorge, M. J. N., & Wexner, S. D. (1993) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02050307 · Cited by 2,985
Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain
Thompson, W. G., Longstreth, G. F., Drossman, D. A., Heaton, K. W., Irvine, E. J., & Müller-Lissner, S. A. (1999) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.45.2008.ii43 · Cited by 2,440
Charbonneau, D. H. (2005) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 2,041
Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse.
Parks, A. G., Swash, M., & Urich, H. (1977) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.18.8.656 · Cited by 552
Speakman, C. T. M., Madden, M. V., Nicholls, R. J., & Kamm, M. A. (1991) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800781207 · Cited by 276
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse
Solomon, M. J., Young, C. J., Eyers, A. A., & Roberts, R. A. (2002) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01957.x · Cited by 261
Baxter, N. N., Rothenberger, D. A., & Lowry, A. C. (2003) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02660762 · Cited by 131
González-Argente, X. F., Jain, A., Nogueras, J. J., Davila, W. G., Weiss, E. G., & Wexner, S. D. (2001) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02235476 · Cited by 123
Mann, C. V., & Hoffman, C. D. (1988) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800750113 · Cited by 121
Novell, J. R., Osborne, M. J., Winslet, M. C., et al. (1994) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800810638 · Cited by 114
Cited by
PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse
Senapati, A., Gray, R. G., Middleton, L. J., Harding, J., Hills, R. K., Armitage, N. C. M., Buckley, L., Northover, J. M. A., & the PROSPER Collaborative Group (2013) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.12177 · Cited by 277
Singh, S., Bolckmans, R., Ratnatunga, K., Gorissen, K., Jones, O., Lindsey, I., & Cunningham, C. (2023) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.16321 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Hoore, A., Cadoni, R., & Penninckx, F.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-10-21
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1500-1505
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2166294089
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
