The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique
Open accessAbstract
Background: Bladder and sexual dysfunction are recognized complications of mesorectal resection. Their incidence following laparoscopic surgery is unknown. Methods: Bladder and sexual function were assessed in patients who had undergone laparoscopic rectal, open rectal or laparoscopic colonic resection as part of the UK Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer (CLASICC) trial, using the International Prostatic Symptom Score, the International Index of Erectile Function and the Female Sexual Function Index. Sexual and bladder function data from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-CR38 collected in the CLASICC trial were used for comparison. Results: Two hundred and forty-seven (71·2 per cent) of 347 patients completed questionnaires. Bladder function was similar after laparoscopic and open rectal operations for rectal cancer. Overall sexual function and erectile function tended to be worse in men after laparoscopic rectal surgery than after open rectal surgery (overall function: difference − 11·18 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) −22·99 to 0·63), P = 0·063; erectile function: difference −5·84 (95 per cent c.i. −10·94 to −0·74), P = 0·068). Total mesorectal excision (TME) was more commonly performed in the laparoscopic rectal group than in the open rectal group. TME (odds ratio (OR) 6·38, P = 0·054) and conversion to open operation (OR 2·86, P = 0·041) were independent predictors of postoperative male sexual dysfunction. No differences were detected in female sexual function. Conclusion: Laparoscopic rectal resection did not adversely affect bladder function, but there was a trend towards worse male sexual function. This may be explained by the higher rate of TME in the laparoscopic rectal resection group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
Rosen, C. B. (2000) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/009262300278597 · Cited by 6,593
Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0 · Cited by 5,849
The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Barry, M. J., Fowler, F. J., O’Leary, M. P., Bruskewitz, R. C., Holtgrewe, H. L., Mebust, W. K., Cockett, A. T. K., & The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association (1992) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36966-5 · Cited by 3,436
Guillou, P. J., Quirke, P., Thorpe, H., Walker, J., Jayne, D. G., Smith, A. M., Heath, R. M., & Brown, J. M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66545-2 · Cited by 3,064
Self-citationRectal Cancer: The Basingstoke Experience of Total Mesorectal Excision, 1978-1997
Heald, R. J., Moran, B. J., Ryall, R. D. H., Sexton, R., & MacFarlane, J. K. (1998) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.133.8.894 · Cited by 1,399
The ‘Holy Plane’ of Rectal Surgery
Heald, R. J. (1988) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107688808100904 · Cited by 804
Sprangers, M. A. G., te Velde, A., & Aaronson, N. K. (1999) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00357-8 · Cited by 506
Cited by
Kang, S.-B., Park, J. W., Jeong, S.-Y., Nam, B. H., Choi, H. S., Kim, D.-W., Lim, S.-B., Lee, T.-G., Kim, D. Y., Kim, J.-S., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70131-5 · Cited by 1,019
Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection
Kuhry, E., Schwenk, W., Gaupset, R., Romild, U., & Bonjer, H. J. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003432.pub2 · Cited by 522
Collinson, F. J., Jayne, D. G., Pigazzi, A., Tsang, C., Barrie, J. M., Edlin, R., Garbett, C., Guillou, P., Holloway, I., Howard, H., et al. (2012) · International Journal of Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1313-6 · Cited by 255
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jayne, D. G., Brown, J. M., Thorpe, H., Walker, J., Quirke, P., & Guillou, P. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-04
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1124-1132
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W1966418469
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bjs.4989
- The paper
- Jayne, D. G., Brown, J. M., Thorpe, H., Walker, J., Quirke, P., & Guillou, P. J. (2005). Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4989
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.